Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anal sphincter repair improves anorectal function and endosonographic image

A prospective clinical study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of anal sphincter repair on fecal continence in relation to anal endosonography and anal manometry. METHODS: Eighteen patients (7 male, 11 female) with anal sphincter defects and complaints of fecal incontinence (5), soiling (= liquid discharge; 3), or both (10) were studied before and after sphincter repair with endosonography and anal manometry. Complaints were the result of obstetric trauma (7), surgical trauma (7), both (3), and other trauma (1). Five patients had previous surgery. Preoperative endosonography showed a defect of both sphincters in nine patients, a defect of the external anal sphincter in five patients, and a defect of the internal anal sphincter in four patients. An overlapping sphincter repair was performed. RESULTS: Postoperatively and subjectively (S; patient's view), 13 (72 percent) patients became continent or improved; in 5 (28 percent) patients the complaints were unaltered. Objectively (O) (incontinence or soiling frequency), these figures were 12 (67 percent) and 6 (33 percent). Postoperative endosonographic images improved in 14 (78 percent) patients; defects of the sphincters (almost) disappeared (4) or were smaller (10). In the other four patients, images were unchanged. In two patients, overlapping of the muscle was clearly visible with anal endosonography. Clinical result (subjective (S) and objective (O)) of sphincter repair correlated with changes in anal endosonography (S,r=0.64,P <0.004; O,r=0.51,P=0.03) and anal manometry (S,r=0.54,P=0.038; O,r=0.44,P=0.09 (not significant)) and not with pudendal nerve latency. CONCLUSION: In 78 percent of our patients, endosonographic sphincter defect had diminished or disappeared after sphincter repair. There was a good correlation between clinical effect of sphincter repair and changes with anal endosonography and anal manometry. Postoperative persistent incontinence is attributable to remaining sphincter defects. Anal endosonography should be performed as a routine procedure in patients with fecal incontinence or soiling, also after failed surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1991;78:312–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M,et al. Anal endosonography: relationship with anal manometry and neurophysiologic tests. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:944–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Endosonographic evaluation of patients with anal incontinence: findings and influence on surgical management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:771–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 1994;81:463–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burnett SJ, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping. Br J Surg 1991;78:448–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Schroeder T, Fazio VW. Endoluminal ultrasound is preferable to electromyography in mapping anal sphincteric defects. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:689–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley MR. Anal sphincter defect: correlation between endoanal ultrasound and surgery. Ann Surg 1993;218:201–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burnett SJ, Spence-Jones C, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Unsuspected sphincter damage following childbirth revealed by anal endosonography. Br J Radiol 1991;64:225–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Anal endosonographic findings in the follow-up of primarily sutured sphincteric ruptures. Br J Surg 1992;79:104–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Felt-Bersma RJ, van Baren R, Koorevaar M, Strijers RL, Cuesta MA. Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:249–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Felt-Bersma RJ, Strijers RL, Janssen JJ, Visser SL, Meuwissen SG. The external anal sphincter. relationship between anal manometry and anal electromyography and its clinical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:112–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Keighley MR, Fielding JW. Management of faecal incontinence and results of surgical treatment. Br J Surg 1983;70:463–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hawley PR. Anal sphincter reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1985;366:269–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Motson RW. Sphincter injuries: indications for, and results of sphincter repair. Br J Surg 1985;72:S19–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pezim ME, Spencer RJ, Stanhope CR, Beart RW Jr, Ready RL, Ilstrup DM. Sphincter repair for fecal incontinence after obstetrical or iatrogenic injury. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:521–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ctercteko GC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL, Melia M. Anal sphincter repair: a report of 60 cases and review of the literature. Aust N Z J Surg 1988;58:703–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Laurberg S, Swash M, Henry MM. Delayed external sphincter repair for obstetric tear. Br J Surg 1988;75:786–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fleshman JW, Dreznik Z, Fry RD, Kodner IJ. Anal sphincter repair for obstetric injury: manometric evaluation of functional results. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:1061–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelman DG. The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:22–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang DT, Nivatvongs S, Vermeulen FD, Herman FN, Goldberg SM, Rothenberger DA. Overlapping sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:720–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Londono-Schimmer EE, Garcia-Duperly R, Nicholls RJ, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR, Thomson JP. Overlapping anal sphincter repair for faecal incontinence due to sphincter trauma: five year follow-up functional results. Int J Colorectal Dis 1994;9:110–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Sultan AH, Bartram CI, Nichols RJ. Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma. Br J Surg 1994;81:1231–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Simmang C, Birnhaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Fleshman JW. Anal sphincter reconstruction in the elderly: does advancing age affect outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1065–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A. New grading and scoring for anal incontinence: evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:482–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fleshman JW, Peters WR, Shemesh EI, Fry RD, Kodner IJ. Anal sphincter reconstruction: anterior overlapping muscle repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:739–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Browning GG, Motson RW. Results of Parks operation for faecal incontinence after sphincter injuries. BMJ 1983;286:1873–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lestar B, Penninckx F, Kerremans R. The composition of anal basal pressure: anin vivo andin vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:118–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gibbons CP, Banister JJ, Trowbridge EA, Read NW. Role of anal cushions in maintaining incontinence. Lancet 1986;2:886–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Felt-Bersma RJ, Janssen JJ, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Hoitsma HW, Meuwissen SG. Soiling: anorectal function and results of treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:37–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mc Hugh SM, Diamant NE. Effect of age, gender and parity on anal canal pressures. Dig Dis Sci 1987;37:726–36.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Felt-Bersma RJ, Gort G, Meuwissen SG. Normal values in anal manometry and rectal sensation: a problem of range. Hepatogastroenterology 1991;38:444–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nielsen MB, Dammegaard L, Pedersen JF. Endosonographic assessment of the anal sphincter after surgical reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:434–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery of the Vrije Universiteit, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Richelle J. F. Felt-Bersma M.D., Ph.D. & Miguel A. Cuesta M.D., Ph.D.

  2. Department of Gastroenterology of the Vrije Universiteit, University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Martine Koorevaar M.D.

  3. Department of Gastroenterology/Surgery, Free University Hospital, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Richelle J. F. Felt-Bersma M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Richelle J. F. Felt-Bersma M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel A. Cuesta M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martine Koorevaar M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Felt-Bersma, R.J.F., Cuesta, M.A. & Koorevaar, M. Anal sphincter repair improves anorectal function and endosonographic image. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 878–885 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053986

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053986

Key words

Search

Navigation