Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on the nutrition of the genus pestalotiopsis

I. The influence of carbon sources on the growth of some pathogenic species of Pestalotiopsis

  • Published:
Mycopathologia et mycologia applicata Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four isolates ofPestalotiopsis, viz.P. gracilis, P. paeoniae isolates I and II, andP. royenae were isolated from the leaf spots ofAchras sapota, Anona squamosa, Syzygium cumini andCarissa congesta respectively. Studies on the nutrition of the isolates were carried out in liquid basal meduim in stationary cultures. Preliminary experiments had shown that a pH of 5.5 and a temperature of 25° C± 1° C were the most suitable for the growth of the present organisms. The growth response of the various species, as judged by their mycelial dry weight on 26 different carbon sources was studied.

Among the pentoses, D-xylose supported poor growth of all the four isolates whereas L-arabinose and L-rhamnose were as good as glucose in efficiency, or occasionally better. Among the hexoses, D-fructose and D-mannose were superior to glucose (except forP. royenae). Galactose and L-sorbose were poor sources, the latter being poorest among all the carbohydrates used in this study. The disaccharides were generally superior to glucose except lactose which was poor. AlsoP. royenae had slighthly inferior growth on trehalose than on glucose. Maximum growth, among disaccharides, was attained on cellobiose. The nutritional value of trisaccharide, raffinose, was maximum for all butP. royenae which too grew better on it than on glucose. The three polysaccharides, viz. soluble starch, dextrin and inulin were much superior than glucose except forP. royenae. Generally sugar alcohols were equal to or better than glucose in efficiency. Glycerol, however, was a very poor source. The acids supported very poor growth of all the isolates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwala, R. K. (1955) D. Phil. Thesis, University of Allahabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, J. S. D. &D. J. Bell (1953)Jr. Chem. Soc. (London): 2508–2530.

  • Bhargava, S. N. (1962) D. Phil. Thesis, University of Allahabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, S. N. &Tandon, R. N. (1964)Mycopath. et Mycol. appl. 24:156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgrami, K. S. &Tandon, R. N. (1957)Proc. Nat. Acad, Sci. India, 27B:196–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgrami, K. S. (1962). D. Sc. Thesis, University of Allahabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgrami, K. S. (1963)Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (India), B.33 IV:547–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgrami, K. S. (1964)Flora Bd. 154, S.81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, S. (1961) D. Phil. Thesis, University of Allahabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, V. W. (1958) Physiology of fungi. John Wiley and Sons. Inc. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrensvard, G. (1955)Exp. Cell. Res. Suppl. 3:102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergus, C. L. (1952)Mycologia, 44:183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A. K. (1964) D. Phil. Thesis, University of Allahabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. H. (1954)Mycologia, 46:702–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, J. S. (1954) D. Phil. Thesis, University of Allahabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. M. (1959)Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 33:132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, B. &Tandon, R. N. (1964)Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (India) 34(B):463–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaphart, C. D. (1956)Mycologia 48:25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilly, V. G. &Barnett, H. L. (1951) Physiology of fungi. Mc Graw Hill Book Co. Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilly, V. G. &Barnett, H. L. (1953)Bull. W. Virginia Agric. Expt. Sta. 362 T.

  • Lilly, V. G. &Barnett, H. L. (1956)Amer. J. Bot. 43:709–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, D. H. (1954)Mycologia 46:161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, R. S., Barnett, H. L. &Lilly, V. G. (1950)Phytopath. 40:104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, A. P. &Mukherjee, A. K. (1962)Indian. Phytopath. 15:211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, A. P. &Mahmood, M. (1960)Indian. Phytopath. 13:12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S. K. &Tandon, R. N. (1966)Phytopath. Z. 55:15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, D. (1948)Amer. J. Bot., 35:36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, M. A. &Plucker, A. F. (1958)Mycologia, 50:223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, S. S. (1963) D. Phil. Thesis, Bihar University, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan, T. S. (1941)Proc. Indian. Acad. Sci. B, 14:395–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai, R. (1959)Nat. Agric. Expt. Sta. Res. Bull. No. 47.

  • Schade, A. L. (1940)Amer. J. Bot. 27:376–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade, A. L. &Thimann, K. V. (1940)Amer. J. Bot. 42:379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirakawa, H. S. (1955)Amer. J. Bot. 42:379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, H. P. (1965) D. Phil. Thesis, University of Allahabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. A. (1935)Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 63:81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. A. (1939)J. Agr. Res. 59:749–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, S. (1961)Proc. Indian. Acad. Sci., 54:295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, W. A. &Vining, L. C. (1959)Canad. J. Microbiol. 5:513–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamia, H. (1932)Acta Phytochim. (Japan) 6:1–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, H. (1956)Pflanzenkrankheiten, 5:165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, M. P. (1950), D. Phil. Thesis, University of Allahabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, R. N. &Agarwala, R. K. (1956)Proc. Indian. Acad. Sci., 43: B.1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, R. N. &Bilgrami, K. S. (1957)Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 27 B:96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, R. N. &Bilgrami, K. S. (1957a) Ibid. 27 B:196–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, R. N. &Bilgrami, K. S. (1957b)Proc. Indian. Acad. Sci. 46:274–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, R. N. &Bilgrami, K. S. (1958)Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. (India) 24:118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, R. N. &Bilgrami, K. S. (1959) Ibid.Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. (India) 25:138–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, R. N. &Bhargava, S. N. (1960)Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (India) B. 30:257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, R. N. &Bhargava, S. N. (1962)Lloydia, 25:167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon R. N. &Mitra, S. K. (1963)Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (India) B, 33 IV:583–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, E. L., Baratt, R. W. &Cutter, V. M. (1949)Science 19:509–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thind, K. S. &Randhawa, H. S. (1957)Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (India) 27:47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tochinai, Y. (1926)J. Coll. Agric. Sappora, 14:171–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trechow, C. (1944)Dansk Bot. Arkiv 11(6):1–180.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dube, H.C. Studies on the nutrition of the genus pestalotiopsis. Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 44, 183–191 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051887

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051887

Keywords

Navigation