Abstract
In 10 patients with emptying disturbances, the anal sphincter reaction was investigated clinically and by electromyography with needle and wire electrodes to elucidate whether pain during the investigation could provoke the paradoxical sphincter reaction. In eight of the patients, the paradoxical reaction was easily felt at digital examination. Two patients complained of pain during the needle electrode recording; none complained during the wire electrode investigation. Nevertheless, all 10 patients had paradoxical sphincter reaction independent of the electrode used at electromyography. With careful clinical investigation, most cases of paradoxical sphincter reaction can be diagnosed. When this is inconclusive, the diagnosis should be confirmed by electromyography, preferably by the wire technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wasserman IF. Puborectalis syndrome (rectal stenosis due to anorectal spasm). Dis Colon Rectum 1964;7:87–98.
Rutter KR, Riddell RH. The solitary ulcer syndrome of the rectum. Clin Gastroenterol 1975;4:505–30.
Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE, Thomas BM. The balloon proctogram. Br J Surg 1984;71:29–32.
Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE. Anismus in chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci 1985;30:413–8.
Kuijpers HC, Bleijenberg G. The spastic pelvic floor syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:669–72.
Johansson C, Ihre T, Holmström B, Nordström E, Dolk A, Brodén G. A combined electromyographic and cineradiologic investigation in patients with defecation disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:1009–13.
Neill ME, Parks AG, Swash M. Physiological studies of the anal sphincter musculature in faecal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1981;68:531–6.
Bartolo DCC, Jarratt JA, Read MG, Donnelly TC, Read NW. The role of partial denervation of the puborectalis in idiopathic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1983;70:664–7.
Keighley MRB, Shouler P. Outlet syndrome: is there a surgical option? J R Soc Med 1984;77:559–63.
Inman VT, Ralston HJ, Saunders JB de CM, Feinstein B, Wright EW Jr. Relation of human electromyogram to muscular tension. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1952;4:187–94.
Basmajian JV, Spring WB. Electromyography of the male sphincter urethrae. Anat Rec 1955;121:388.
Basmajian JV. Electrodes and electrode connectors. In: Desmedt JE, ed. New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology. Vol. 1. Basel: Karger, 1973:502–10.
Taverner D, Smiddy FG. An electromyographic study of the normal function of the external anal sphincter and pelvic diaphragm. Dis Colon Rectum 1959;2:153–60.
Jones PN, Lubowski DZ, Swash M, Henry MM. Is paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscle of functional importance? Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:667–70.
Womack NR, Williams NS, Holmfield IHM, Morrison IFB, Simpkins KC. New method for the dynamic assessment of anorectal function in constipation. Br J Surg 1985;72:994–8.
Keighley MRB, Henry MM, Bartolo DCC, Mortensen NJMC. Anorectal physiology measurement: report of a working party. Br J Surg 1989;76:356–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Johansson, C., Nilsson, B.Y., Holmström, B. et al. Is paradoxical sphincter reaction provoked by needle electrode electromyography?. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 1109–1112 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050072
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050072