Abstract
Diagnosis of acute appendicitis is established generally by the surgeon's clinical impression. Today, negative laparotomy rate because of clinical diagnosis is still 15 to 25 percent. PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to compare it with the surgeon's clinical diagnosis. METHODS: One hundred eight consecutive patients were studied prospectively. Depending on results of the examination by a surgeon, patients underwent surgery for acute appendicitis. Serum CRP measurements were performed before the operations but were not taken into account for the decision of laparotomy to compare it with the surgeon's clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: Histopathologic findings confirmed acute appendicitis in 90 patients. Normal appendixes were removed in the remaining 18 patients. Mean serum CRP value was 5 (range, 0–12.6) mg/l in patients with normal appendix, 33.8 (range, 5–85.1) mg/l in patients with nonperforated appendicitis, and 128.5 (range, 79.2–230) mg/l in patients with perforated appendixes. These differences were highly significant (P <10−6). Serum CRP levels were normal in three patients with acute appendicitis. Thus, the false-negative rate of CRP was 3 percent. Of 18 patients with normal appendectomy serum CRP levels were slightly elevated in two patients. We determined, therefore, a false-positive rate of CRP as 11 percent. CRP levels were false-negative in three patients and false-positive in two patients. Thus, CRP levels were true (positive or negative) in the remaining 103 patients. On the other hand, the diagnosis depending on surgeon's clinical impression was true in 90 patients and false in 18 patients. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0035). In the present study the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of serum CRP measurements were calculated as 93.5, 80, and 91 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found that elevated serum CRP levels support surgeon's clinical diagnosis. We recommend CRP measurement as a routine laboratory test in patients with suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Scherer LR. Acute appendicitis. In: Cameron JL, ed. Current surgical therapy. 4th ed. St. Louis: BC Decker, 1992:217–9.
Schwartz SI. Appendix. In: Schwartz SI, ed. Principles of surgery. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994:1307–18.
Sinanan MN. Acute abdomen and appendix. In: Greenfield LJ, ed. Surgery, scientific principles and practice. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1993:1120–4.
Abbas AK, Lichtman AH, Pober JS. Cellular and molecular immunology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:232.
Dinarello CA. The acute phase response. In: Wyngaarden JB, Smith LH, eds. Cecil textbook of medicine. 18th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1988:1527–9.
Blair NP, Bugis SP, Turner LJ, MacLeod MM. Review of the pathologic diagnosis of 2216 appendectomy specimens. Am J Surg 1993;165:618–20.
Dueholm S, Bagi P, Bud M. Laboratory aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a blinded, prospective trial concerning diagnostic value of leucocyte count, neutrophil differential count, and C-reactive protein. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:855–9.
Thimsen DA, Tong GK, Gruenberg JC. Prospective evaluation of C-reactive protein in patients suspected to have acute appendicitis. Am Surg 1989;55:466–8.
Albu E, Miller BM, Choi Y, Lakhanpel S, Murthy RN, Gerst PH. Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:49–51.
Davies AH, Bernau F, Salisbury A, Souter AG. C-reactive protein in right iliac fossa pain. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1991;36:242–4.
Oosterhuis WP, Zwinderman AH, Teeuwen M, Van Andel G, Olddenjiel H. C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur J Surg 1993;159:115–9.
Emery M, Jones J, Brown M. Clinical application on infrared thermography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 1994;12:48–50.
Biersack HJ, Overbeck B, Ott G,et al. Tc 99 m labeled monoclonal antibodies against granulocytes (BW 250/183) in the detection of appendicitis. Clin Nucl Med 1993;18:371–6.
Laitinen R, Tahtinen J, Lantto T, Vorne M. Tc 99 m labeled leucocyte in imaging of patients with suspected acute abdominal inflammation. Clin Nucl Med 1990;15:597–602.
John H, Neff U, Kellemen M. Appendicitis diagnosis today: clinical and ultrasonic deductions. World J Surg 1993;17:243–9.
Wade DS, Marrow SE, Balsara ZN, Burkhard TK, Goff WB. Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon's clinical impression. Arch Surg 1993;128:1039–44.
Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BR, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1994;190:31–5.
Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melline BF. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:763–6.
Nordback I, Harju E. Inflammation parameters in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Scand 1988;154:43–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Gurleyik, E., Gurleyik, G. & Unalmiser, S. Accuracy of serum c-reactive protein measurements in diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon's clinical impression. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 1270–1274 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049151
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049151