Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chronic fissure-in-ano: A randomized study comparing open and subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

A prospective study comparing open and subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure was conducted. One hundred twelve patients were randomized to open (n=54) or subcutaneous (n=58) sphincterotomy. There was no significant difference in acute complications between the subcutaneous (8.6 percent) and open (7.4 percent) groups. Postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter for the subcutaneous group (1.7±0.2 days) than for the open group (2.3±0.1 days;P <0.001). Although the response rate to a pain questionnaire was <50 percent, the data suggest a lower level of postoperative pain in the subcutaneous group. Fissure healing was similar between the subcutaneous (96.6 percent) and open (94.4 percent) groups. We conclude that subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic fissure-in-ano is effective and may result in significantly less postoperative discomfort, shorter postoperative lengths of stay, and a comparable rate of complications compared with the open technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nothman BJ, Schuster MM. Internal anal sphincter derangement with anal fissures. Gastroenterology 1974;67:216–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Notaras MJ. Anal fissure and stenosis. Surg Clin North Am 1988;68:1427–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg SM, Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S. Essentials of anorectal surgery. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Olsen J, Mortsen PE, Peterson K, Christiansen J. Anal sphincter function after treatment of fissure-in-ano by lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy versus anal dilatation, a randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987;165:46–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenhammer S. The surgical correction of chronic anal (sphincteric) contracture. S Afr Med J 1951;25:486–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenhammer S. The evaluation of internal anal sphincterotomy operation with special reference to anal fissure. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1959;109:583–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Parks AG. The management of fissure-in-ano. Hosp Med 1967;1:737–43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hawley PR. The treatment of chronic fissure-in-ano; a trial of methods. Br J Surg 1969;56:915–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffman DD, Goligher JC. Lateral subcutaneous internal sphincterotomy in treatment of anal fissure BMJ 1970;3:673–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Notaras MJ. The treatment of anal fissure by lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy; a technique and results. Br J Surg 1971;58:96–100.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Corman ML. Long term results of open and closed sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:368–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kortbeek, J.B., Langevin, J.M., Khoo, R.E.H. et al. Chronic fissure-in-ano: A randomized study comparing open and subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 35, 835–837 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047868

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047868

Key words

Navigation