Abstract
The response ofT. lineatum to ethanol and α-pinene, when used with the pheromone lineatin, was tested for two trap types. Funnel traps, which are passive barrier traps, caught significantly more beetles than drainpipe traps, which require an active response by the beetle to enter the trap. However, the response ofT. lineatum to the semiochemical treatments did not significantly differ for the two trap types. Treatments that included α-pinene with the pheromone, either with or without ethanol, caught significantly moreT. lineatin than those with the pheromone alone. When ethanol and or α-pinene were added to the pheromone significantly more female beetles were trapped than with pheromone alone. Male-female ratios were significantly lower for both types of traps when ethanol was included in the bait than for lineatin alone or with α-pinene. A higher percentage of male beetles entered the drainpipe traps than was captured with funnel traps.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andryszak, N. A., Lindgren, B. S., andPayne, T. L. 1987. Electrophysiological responses byTrypodendron lineatum (Ol.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) from western Canada and Germany to lineatin and isomers of α-pinene.J. Appl. Entomol. 103:23–28.
Bakke, A. 1983. Dosage response of the ambrosia beetleTrypodendron lineatum (Olivier) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) to semiochemicals.Z. Angew. Entomol. 95:158–161.
Bauer, J., andVité, J. P. 1975. Host selection byTrypodendron lineatum.Naturwissenschaften 62:539.
Birch, M. C. 1978. Chemical communication in pine bark beetles.Am. Sci. 66:409–419.
Borden, J. H., Oehlschlager, A. C., Slessor, K. N., Chong, L., andPierce, H. D., Jr. 1980. Field tests of isomers of lineatin, the aggregation pheromone ofTrypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 112:107–109.
Borden, J. H., King, C. J., Lindgren, S., Chong, L., Gray, D. R., Oehlschlager, A. C., Slessor, K. N., andPierce, H. D., Jr. 1982. Variation in response ofTrypodendron lineatum from two continents to semiochemicals and trap form.Environ. Entomol. 11:403–408.
Graham, K. 1968. Anaerobic induction of primary chemical attractancy for ambrosia beetles.Can. J. Zool. 46:905–908.
King, C. J., Oehlschlager, A. C., andBorden, J. H. 1983. Response ofTrypodendron lineatum (Olivier) to isomers of its aggregation pheromone, lineatin, in England.Z. Angew. Entomol. 95:531–533.
Klimetzek, D., Vité, J. P., andMori, K. 1980. Zur workung und formulierung des populationslockstoffes des nutzholzborkenkäfersTrypodendron (=Xyloterus)lineatum.Z. Angew. Entomol. 89:57–63.
Klimetzek, D., Kiesel, K., andMöhring, C. 1981.Trypodendron lineatum: Reduction of pheromone response by male beetles.Naturwissenschaften 68:149–150.
Klimetzek, D., Köhler, J., Vité, J. P., andKohnle, U. 1986. Dosage response to ethanol mediates host selection by “secondary” bark beetles.Naturwissenschaften 73:270–272.
Kvamme, T. 1986.Trypodendron piceum Strand (Col., Scolytidae): Flight period and response to synthetic pheromones.Fauna Norv. Ser. B. 33:65–70.
Lindgren, B. S. 1983. A multiple funnel trap for scolytid beetles (Coleoptera).Can. Entomol. 115:299–302.
Lindgren, B. S. 1986.Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) breeding in bigleaf maple,Acer macrophyllum. J. Entomol. Soc. B.C.
Lindgren, B. S., Borden, J. H., Chong, L. Friskie, L. M., andOrr, D. B. 1983. Factors influencing the efficiency of pheromone-baited traps for three species of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 115:303–313.
MacConnell, J. G., Borden, J. H., Silverstein, R. M., andStokkink, E. 1977. Isolation and tentative identification of lineatin, a pheromone from the frass ofTrypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 3:549–561.
McClean, J. A. 1985. Ambrosia beetles: A multimillion dollar degrade problem of sawlogs in coastal British Columbia.For. Chron. 61:295–298.
McLean, J. A., Bakke, A., andNiemeyer, H. 1987. An evaluation of three traps and two lures for the ambrosia beetleTrypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Canada, Norway, and West Germany.Can. Entomol. 119:273–280.
Moeck, H. A. 1970. Ethanol as the primary attractant for the ambrosia beetleTrypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 102:985–995.
Moeck, H. A. 1971. Field test of ethanol as a scolytid attractant. Can. Dep. Fisheries and Forestry.Bi-mon. Res. Notes 27:11–12.
Nijholt, W. W., andSchönherr, J. 1976. Chemical response behavior of scolytids in West Germany and Western Canada. Environment Canada.Bi-mon. Res. Notes 32:31–32.
Paiva, M. R., andKiesel, K. 1985. Field responses ofTrypodendron spp. (Col. Scolytidae) to different concentrations of lineatin and α-pinene.Z. Angew. Entomol. 99:442–448.
Payne, T. L., Klimetzek, D., Kohnle, U., andMori, K. 1983. Electrophysiological and field responses ofTrypodendron spp. to enantiomers of lineatin.Z. Ang. Entomol. 95:272–276.
Perry, J. N., Wall, C., andGreen, A. R. 1980. Latin square designs in field experiments involving insect sex attractants.Ecol. Entomol. 5:385–396.
Ramisch, H., andBombosch, S. 1986. Ein beitrag zur brutbaumerkennung vonTrypodendron lineatum (Ol.) undTrypodendron domesticum (L.).J. Appl. Entomol. 102:422–431.
Salom, S. M., andMcLean, J. A. 1988. Semiochemicals for capturing the ambrosia beetleTrypodendron lineatum in multiple-funnel traps in British Columbia.J. Entomol. Soc. B.C. 85:34–39.
Salom, S. M., andMcLean, J. A. 1990. Flight and landing behavior ofTrypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in response to different semiochemicals.J. Chem. Ecol. 16:2589–2604.
Schroeder, L. M. 1988. Attraction of the bark beetleTomicus piniperda and some other bark- and wood-living beetles to the host volatiles α-pinene and ethanol.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 46:203–210.
Schroeder, L. M., andLindelöw, Å. 1989. Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of α-pinene and ethanol.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:807–817.
Schurig, V., Weber, R., Klimetzek, D., Kohne, U., andMori, K. 1982. Enantiomeric composition of “lineatin” in three sympatric ambrosia beetles.Naturwissenschaften 69:602–603.
Shore, T. L., andMcLean, J. A. 1983. A further evaluation of the interactions between the pheromones and two host kairomones of the ambrosia beetlesTrypodendron lineatum andGnathotrichus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 115:1–5.
Shore, T. L., McLean, J. A., andZanuncio, J. C. 1987. Reproduction and survival of the ambrosia beetleTrypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Douglas-fir and western hemlock logs.Can. Entomol. 119:131–139.
Tømerås, B. A. 1989. Host selection by odorous compounds from host and non-host trees in bark beetles.Fauna Norv. Ser. B. 36:75–79.
Vité, J. P. andBakke, A. 1979. Synergism between chemical and physical stimuli in host colonization by an ambrosia beetle.Naturwissenschaften 66:528–529.
Wood, S. L. 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)., a taxonomic monograph.Great Basin Nat. Mem. 6:1359 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shore, T.L., Lindgren, B.S. Effect of ethanol and α-pinene on response of ambrosia beetle,Trypodendron lineatum, to lineatin-baited funnel and drainpipe traps. J Chem Ecol 22, 2187–2196 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029539
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029539