Abstract
Urethral Chlamydia trachomatis infection was diagnosed in 204 of 1,011 (20.2 %) male patients by cell culture, in 219 (21.7 %) by an antigen detection test consisting of a solid phase immunoassay, and in 247 (24.4 %) patients by both methods combined. The positive results of the two methods agreed for 176 patients, and both positive and negative results of the tests agreed for 940 patients (93 %). With cell culture as the reference method, the antigen detection test had a sensitivity of 86.3 %, a specificity of 94.7 %, a positive predictive value of 80.4 % and a negative predictive value of 96.5 %. It gave false negative results in 28 patients. In 43 patients the antigen detection test gave a positive result, whereas culture was negative. Thirty-nine of these males were treated with antibiotics (tetracycline or erythromycin), 19 because their consorts had a proven Chlamydia trachomatis infection, and 20 for obvious clinical and/or microscopic findings of urethritis requiring treatment. According to this analysis there were 19 probable misses by cell culture test and four true false-positives by the antigen detection test, i.e. less than 0.4 % of all patients examined. Since one-third of males with a final diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection were clinically asymptomatic efforts to control genital chlamydial infections must identify this reservoir. The antigen detection test provides an alternative diagnostic method to the more laborious and time-consuming cell culture procedure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Holmes, K. K., Handsfield, H. H., Wang, S. P., Went-worth, B. B., Turck, M., Anderson, J. B., Alexander, E. R.: Etiology of nongonococcal urethritis. New England Journal of Medicine 1975, 292: 1199–1205.
Gordon, F. B., Harper, I. A., Quan, A. L., Treharne, J. D., Dwyer, R. St. C., Garland, J. A.: Detection ofChlamydia (Bedsonia) in certain infections of man: I. Laboratory procedures: comparison of yolk-sac and cell culture for detection and isolation. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1969, 120: 451–462.
Mårdh, P.-A.: Laboratory diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases; bacteria, chlamydiae, and mycoplasmas. In: Holmes, K. K., Mardh, P.-A., Sparling, P. F., Wiesner, P. J. (ed.): Sexually transmitted diseases. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1984, p. 829–856.
Oriel, J. D., Ridgway, R. L.: Genital infection byChlamydia trachomatis. In: Phillips, I. (ed.): Current topics in infection series, 2. Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd., London, 1982.
Tam, M. R., Stamm, W. E., Handsfield, H. H., Stephens, R., Kuo, C. C., Holmes, K. K., Ditzenberger, K., Krieger, M., Nowinski, R. C.: Culture-independent diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis using monoclonal antibodies. New England Journal of Medicine 1984, 310: 1146–1150.
Jones, M. F., Smith, T. F., Houghlum, A. J., Herrmann, J. E.: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens by the Chlamydiazyme test. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1984, 20: 465–467.
Van Ulsen, J., Van Zuuren-van der Horst, A., Tjiam, K. H., van der Heijst, Y., Michel, M. F., van Fijk, R. V. W., van Joost, T., Stoltz, E.: Solid-phase enzyme immuno-assay for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 4: 397–399.
Mumtaz, G., Mellars, B. J., Ridgway, G. L., Oriel, J. D.: Enzyme immunoassay for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis antigen in urethral and endocervical swabs. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1985, 38: 740–742.
Ripa, T.: Biological principles of the culture ofChlamydia trachomatis in cell monolayers. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1982, Supplement 32: 25–29.
Ripa, T., Mårdh, P.-A.: Cultivation ofChlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1977, 6: 328–331.
Galen, R. S., Gambino, R. S.: The predictive value and efficiency of medical diagnoses. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1975.
Danielsson, D., Sandström, E., Kjellander, J., Moi, H., Wallmark, G.: Culture diagnosis of gonorrhoea — A comparison between two standard laboratory methods and a commercial gonococcal culture kit. Acta Dermatovenereologica 1978, 587: 69–73.
Mårdh, P.-A., Zeeberg, B.: Toxic effect of sampling swabs and transportation test tubes on the formation of intracytoplasmic inclusions ofChlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cell cultures. British Journal of Venereal Diseases 1981, 57: 268–272.
Schachter, J.:Chlamydia trachomatis infections: epidemiology and disease spectrum. In: Oriel, J. D., Harris, J. R. W. (ed.): Recent advances in sexually transmitted diseases. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1986, p. 39–58.
Hansson, H., Danielsson, D.: Epidemiology of sexually transmitted diseases in Scandinavian countries. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1982, Supplement 32: 149–156.
Agder, H., Shafer, M.-A., Sweet, R. L., Schachter, J.: Screening forChlamydia trachomatis andNeisseria gonorrhoeae in adolescent males: value of first-catch urine. Lancet 1984, ii: 944–945.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moi, H., Danielsson, D. Diagnosis of genitalChlamydia trachomatis infection in males by cell culture and antigen detection test. Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 5, 563–568 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017706
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017706