Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical experience with ciprofloxacin in the USA

  • Articles
  • Ciprofloxacin: Clinical Experience
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This interim analysis of the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin is based on case reports of 1241 adult patients treated primarily in the USA; 1026 were suitable for analysis of drug efficacy. The daily dose ranged from 500 to 1500 mg, the unit dose being given every 12 h. Duration of treatment ranged from 5 to 211 days (mean 12.6 days). In 1046 cases of infection the site was the urinary tract (514), skin structures (218), respiratory tract (215), blood (43), bone (27), abdomen (13), gastrointestinal tract (13) and pelvis (3). Organisms responsible for infection wereEscherichia coli (282),Pseudomonas aeruginosa (238),Staphylococcus spp. (149),Streptococcus spp. (107),Klebsiella spp. (105),Proteus spp. (97),Haemophilus spp. (71),Enterobacter spp. (58),Salmonella spp. (44),Gtrobacter spp. (27), andSerratia spp. (22). Signs and symptoms of infection resolved in 84% of all cases; 12.6% improved and 3.4% failed to improve. Pathogens were eradicated in 91% of urinary tract infections and in 87% of all other cases of infection combined; superinfections occurred in 5.3% of all patients. At the four-week follow-up 83% of patients with urinary tract infection still had sterile urine. Adverse reactions during therapy were considered probably or possibly drug-related in 166 patients. Nausea (37), diarrhea (25), vomiting (15), nervousness (28), and rash (9) were the most frequent; in only 2% of cases was it necessary to discontinue the drug. Results of ophthalmologic studies were generally unremarkable. Occasional elevations of SGOT and SGPT, and rare elevations of NPN related to ciprofloxacin therapy were seen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fass, R.: In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin (Bay 0 9867). Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1983, 24: 568–574.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauernfeind, A., Petermueller, C.: In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and nalidixic acid. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 2: 111–115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aronoff, G., Kenner, C., Sloan, R., Pottratz, S.: Multiple-dose ciprofloxacin kinetics in normal subjects. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1984, 36: 384–388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wise, R., Lockley, R., Webberly, M., Dent, J.:Pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered ciprofloxacin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1984, 26: 208–210.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eron, L., Harvey, L., Hixon, D., Poretz, D.: Ciprofloxacin therapy of infections caused byPseudomonas aeruginosa and other resistant bacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1985, 28: 308–310.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramirez, C., Bran, J., Mejia, C., Garcia, J.: Open, prospective study of the clinical efficacy of ciprofloxacin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1985, 28: 128–132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Follath, F., Bindschedler, M., Wenk, M., Frei, R., Stalder, H., Rebel, H.:Use of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986, 5: 236–240.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arcieri, G., August, R., Becker, N. et al. Clinical experience with ciprofloxacin in the USA. Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 5, 220–225 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013994

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013994

Keywords

Navigation