Skip to main content
Log in

A study of mixed continuous cultures of sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecological relationships between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria in mud of Lake Vechten have been studied by continuous culture studies using the chemostat technique. The maximum specific growth rate (μ max) and saturation constant (K s) were, respectively, 0.36 hr−1 and 0.047 mM for lactate-limited growth ofDesulfovibrio desulfuricans and 0,011 hr−1 and 0.17 mM for acetate-limited growth ofMethanobacterium sp. Calculated values for the true molar growth yieldsY G) and maintenance coefficients (m) were 30.6 g bacterial mass/mole of lactate and 0.53 g substrate/g dry wt hr forD. desulfuricans and 37.8 g bacterial mass/mole of acetate and 0.54 g substrate/g dry wt hr forMethanobacterium.

No growth ofMethanobacterium was observed at apS2− value (the hydrogen sulfide potential) of more than 11 and there was no effect on the growth atpS2− values above 13. In mixed continuous culture experiments the concentration of acetate decreased in the secondstage growth vessel, whereas that of methane increased stoichiometrically. If the substrate concentration in the reservoirs (S r) was increased from 0.1 to 0.5 mg/ml, the population ofDesulfovibrio increased and that ofMethanobacterium was washed out of the culture vessel, since the concentration of hydrogen sulfide reached apS2− value of 10.5. From the mixed continuous culture experiments a commensalism between the two species can be described, i.e., the acetate-fermentingMethanobacterium benefits from the acetate released byDesulfovibrio which is, in turn, not affected in the presence of the former.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker, K. 1968. Low cost continuous culture apparatus.Lab. Pract. 17: 817–824.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barker, H.A. 1936. Studies upon the methane-producing bacteria.Arch. Mikrobiol. 7: 420–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cappenberg, Th. E. 1972. Ecological observations on heterotrophic, methane oxidizing and sulfate reducing bacteria in a pond.Hydrobiologia 40: 471–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cappenberg, Th. E. 1974. Interrelations between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a fresh-water lake. I. Field observations.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 40: 285–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cappenberg, Th. E. 1974. Interrelations between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a fresh-water lake. II. Inhibition experiments.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 40: 297–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cappenberg, Th. E. and Prins, R.A. 1974. Interrelations between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a fresh-water lake. III. Experiments with14C-labeled subslrates.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 40: 457–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gemerden van, H. 1967. On the bacterial sulphur cycle of inland waters. Thesis, Leiden.

  8. Hungate, R.E. 1969. A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes.In: Methods in Microbiology. J.R. Noris and D.W. Ribbons, editors. Vol. 3B, pp. 117–132. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mylroie, R.L. and Hungate, R.E. 1954. Experiments on the methane bacteria in sludge.Can. J. Microbiol. 1: 55–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pirt, S.J. 1965. The maintenance energy of bacteria in growing cultures.Proc. Royal Soc. B 163: 224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Postgate, J. 1965. Enrichment and isolation of sulfate-reducing bacteria.Zbl. Bakt. l. Abtl., Supplementheft 1: 190–197.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Postgate, J. and Campbell, L.L. 1966. Classification ofDesulfovibrio species, the nonsporulating sulphate-reducing bacteria.Bact. Rev. 30: 732–738.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pretorius, W.A. 1972. The effect of formate on the growth of acetate utilizing methanogenic bacteria.Water Res. 6: 1213–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Senez, J.C. 1962. Some considerations on the energetics of bacterial growth.Bact. Rev. 26: 95–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stouthamer, A.M. 1973. A theoretical study on the amount of ATP required for synthesis of microbial cell material.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 39: 545–565.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stouthamer, A.H. and Bettenhaussen, C. 1973. Utilization of energy for growth and maintenance in continuous and batch cultures of microorganisms. A reevaluation of the method for the determination of ATP production by measuring molar growth yields.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 301: 53–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tempest, D.W. 1970. The cultivation of micro-organisms. I. Theory of the chemostat.In: Methods in Microbiology. J.R. Noris and D.W. Ribbons, editors. Vol. 2, pp. 259–276. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Veldkamp, H. and Jannasch, H.W. 1972. Mixed culture studies with the chemostat.J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 22: 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wolfe, R.S. 1971. Microbial formation of methane.Advan. Microbial Physiol. 6: 107–146.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zeikus, J.G. and Wolfe, R.S. 1972.Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicus sp. n., an anaerobic, autotrophic, extreme thermophile.J. Bacteriol. 109: 707–713.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cappenberg, T.E. A study of mixed continuous cultures of sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria. Microb Ecol 2, 60–72 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010381

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010381

Keywords

Navigation