Annals of Vascular Surgery

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 66–75 | Cite as

Angioscopy in vascular surgery: The state of the art

  • William C. Pevec
General Review


Although angioscopy is considered by many vascular surgeons to be a valuable clinical tool, others view it as expensive and unnecessary. To better define the appropriate role for angioscopy in vascular surgery, a critical review of the recent literature was undertaken. Angioscopy allows more complete valvulotomies with fewer endothelial injuries when preparing autogenous veins to be used as arterial conduits, and results in more complete thromboembolectomy of native arteries and grafts. Angioscopy can replace completion arteriography in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions with an equivalent clinical outcome. Angioscopy may be useful in the assessment of carotid endarterectomy, femoral vein valve repair, and pulmonary embolectomy. It has been useful in various research applications. The rate of complications is less than 1%. Angioscopy is of benefit in preparing veins to be used as arterial conduits and in performing thromboembolectomy. In some circumstances it can replace intraoperative arteriography. Other applications await further validation. The risks of angioscopy are acceptably low.


Research Application Recent Literature Critical Review Femoral Vein Carotid Endarterectomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cutler EC, Levine SA, Beck CS. The surgical treatment of mitral stenosis: Experimental and clinical studies. Arch Surg 1924;9:689–727.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen DS, Graham EA. Intracardiac surgery — a new method. JAMA 1922;79:1028–1030.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carlens E, Silander T. Method for direct inspection of the right atrium: Experimental investigation in the dog. Surgery 1961;49:622–624.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlens E, Silander T. Cardioscopy. J Cardiovasc Surg 1963;4:512–515.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vollmar JF, Storz LW. Vascular endoscopy: Possibilities and limits of its clinical application. Surg Clin North Am 1974;54:111–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Towne JB, Bernhard VM. Vascular endoscopy: Useful tool or interesting toy. Surgery 1977;82:415–419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grundfest WS, Litvack F, Hickey A, et al. The current status of angioscopy and laser angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:667–673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mladinich CRJ, Akins EW, Weingarten KE, et al. Carbon dioxide as an angioscopic medium: Comparison to venous methods of saline delivery. Invest Radiol 1991;26:874–878.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silverman SH, Mladinich CJ, Hawkins IF, et al. The use of carbon dioxide gas to displace flowing blood during angioscopy. J Vasc Surg 1989;10:313–317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baxter BT, Rizzo RJ, Flinn WR, et al. A comparative study of intraoperative angioscopy and completion arteriography following femorodistal bypass. Arch Surg 1990;125:997–1002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    White GH, White RA, Kopchok GE, et al. Intraoperative video angioscopy compared with arteriography during peripheral vascular operations. J Vasc Surg 1987;6:488–495.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Woelfle KD, Kugelmann U, Bruijnen H, et al. Intraoperative imaging techniques in infrainguinal arterial bypass grafting: Completion angiography versus vascular endoscopy. Eur J Vasc Surg 1994;8:556–561.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siegel RJ, Ariani M, Fishbein MC, et al. Histopathologic validation of angioscopy and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 1991;84:109–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller A, Marcaccio EJ, Tannenbaum GA, et al. Comparison of angioscopy and angiography for monitoring infrainguinal bypass vein grafts: Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:382–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grundfest WS, Litvack F, Sherman T, et al. Delineation of peripheral and coronary detail by intraoperative angioscopy. Ann Surg 1985;202:394–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sherman CT, Litvack F, Grundfest W, et al. Coronary angioscopy in patients with unstable angina pectoris. N Engl J Med 1986;315:913–919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Woefle KD, Bruijnen H, Zuegel N, et al. In situ saphenous vein grafts for femorodistal bypass: Evaluation of endoscopically monitored valvulotomy on graft patency. Cardiovasc Surg 1993;1:690–694.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stonebridge PA, Murie JA. Angioscopy: A new light on peripheral vascular disease. Eur J Vasc Surg 1992;6:346–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miller A, Campbell DR, Gibbons GW, et al. Routine intraoperative angioscopy in lower extremity revascularization. Arch Surg 1989;124:604–608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grundfest WS, Litvack F, Glick D, et al. Intraoperative decisions based on angioscopy in peripheral vascular surgery. Circulation 1988;78(Suppl I):I-13–I-17.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gilbertson JJ, Walsh DB, Zwolak RM, et al. A blinded comparison of angiography, angioscopy, and duplex scanning in the intraoperative evaluation of in situ saphenous vein bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:121–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miller A, Stonebridge PA, Jepsen SJ, et al. Continued experience with intraoperative angioscopy for monitoring infrainguinal bypass grafting. Surgery 1991;109:286–293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miller A, Stonebridge PA, Tsoukas AI, et al. Angioscopically directed valvulotomy: A new valvulotome and technique. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:813–821.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chin AK, Mayer DN, Goldman RK, et al. The effect of valvulotomy on the flow rate through the saphenous vein graft: Clinical implications. J Vasc Surg 1988;8:316–320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miller A, Jepsen SJ, Stonebridge PA, et al. New angioscopic findings in graft failure after infrainguinal bypass. Arch Surg 1990;125:749–755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schwartz ME, Harrington EB, Schanzer H. Wound complications after in situ bypass. J Vasc Surg 1988;7:802–807.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    LaMuraglia GM, Cambria RP, Brewster DC, et al. Angioscopy guided semiclosed technique for in situ bypass. J Vasc Surg 1990;12:601–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mehigan JT. Angioscopic control of in situ bypass: Technical considerations. Semin Vasc Surg 1993;6:176–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maini BS, Andrews L, Salimi T, et al. A modified, angioscopically assisted technique for in situ saphenous vein bypass: Impact on patency, complications, and length of stay. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:1041–1049.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pigott JP, Donovan DL, Fink JA, et al. Angioscope-assisted occlusion of venous tributaries with prolamine in in situ femoropopliteal bypass: Preliminary results of canine experiments. J Vasc Surg 1989;9:704–709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cikrit DF, Dalsing MC, Lalka SG, et al. Early results of endovascular-assisted in situ saphenous vein bypass grafting. J Vasc Surg 1994;19:778–787.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rosenthal D, Herring MB, O'Donovan TG, et al. Endovascular infrainguinal in situ saphenous vein bypass: A multicenter preliminary report. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:453–458.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chervu A, Ahn SS, McNamara TO, et al. Endovascular obliteration of in situ saphenous vein arteriovenous fistulas during tibial bypass. Ann Vasc Surg 1993;7:320–324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fleisher HL, Thompson BW, McCowan TC, et al. Angioscopically monitored saphenous vein valvulotomy. J Vasc Surg 1986;4:360–364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Matsumoto T, Hashizume M, Yang Y, et al. The use of angioscopy in vascular surgery. Contemp Surg 1986;29:31–35.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stonebridge PA, Miller A, Tsoukas A, et al. Angioscopy of arm vein infrainguinal bypass grafts. Ann Vasc Surg 1991;5:170–175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Marcaccio EJ, Miller A, Tannenbaum GA, et al. Angioscopically directed interventions improve arm vein bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:994–1004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hoelzenbein TJ, Pomposelli FB, Miller A, et al. The upper arm basilic-cephalic loop for distal bypass grafting: Technical considerations and follow-up. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:586–594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    White GH, White RA, Kopchok BS, et al. Angioscopic thromboembolectomy: Preliminary observations with a recent technique. J Vasc Surg 1988;7:318–325.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Segalowitz J, Grundfest WS, Treiman RL, et al. Angioscopy for intraoperative management of thromboembolectomy. Arch Surg 1990;125:1357–1362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hoelzenbein TJ, Miller A, Tannenbaum GA, et al. Role of angioscopy in reoperation for the failing or failed infrainguinal bypass graft. Ann Vasc Surg 1994;8:74–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    White JV, Haas KS, Comerota AJ. An alternative method of salvaging occluded suprainguinal bypass grafts with operative angioscopy and endovascular intervention. J Vasc Surg 1993;18:922–931.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    LaMuraglia GM, Brewster DC, Moncure AC, et al. Angioscopic evaluation of unilateral aortic graft limb thrombectomy: Is it helpful? J Vasc Surg 1993;17:1069–1076.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stept BL, Flinn WR, McCarthy WJ, et al. Technical defects as a cause of early graft failure after femorodistal bypass. Arch Surg 1987;122:599–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Trubel W, Magometschnigg H, Al-Hachich Y, et al. Intraoperative control following femorodistal revascularization: Angioscopy is superior to angiography. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;42:199–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Harward TRS, Govostis DM, Rosenthal GJ, et al. Impact of angioscopy on infrainguinal graft patency. Am J Surg 1994;168:107–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Raithel D, Kasprzak P. Angioscopy after carotid endarterectomy. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1992;81:192–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Raithel D. Intraoperative angioscopy after carotid endarterectomy. J Mal Vasc 1993;18:258–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Towne JB, Bernhard VM. Vascular endoscopy — an adjunct to carotid surgery. Stroke 1977;8:569–579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mehigan JT, Olcott C. Video angioscopy as an alternative to intraoperative arteriography. Am J Surg 1986;152:139–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kuroda S, Kamiyama H, Takahashi A, et al. Clinical application of angioscopy during carotid endarterectomy for patients with internal carotid artery stenosis. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1993;33:815–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gaunt ME, Naylor AR, Ratliff DA, et al. Role of completion angioscopy in detecting technical error after carotid endarterectomy. Br J Surg 1994;81:42–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gloviczki P, Merrell SW, Bower TC. Femoral vein valve repair under direct vision without venotomy: A modified technique with use of angioscopy. J Vasc Surg 1991;14:645–648.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Welch HJ, McLaughlin RL, O'Donnell TF. Femoral vein valvuloplasty: Intraoperative angioscopic evaluation and hemodynamic improvement. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:694–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shure D, Moser KM, Harrell JH, et al. Identification of pulmonary emboli in the dog: Comparison of angioscopy and perfusion scanning. Circulation 1981;64:618–621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Shure D, Moser KM, Konopka RG. Hemodynamics and gas exchange during angioscopy in the dog. Angiology 1984;35:97–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shure D, Gregoratos G, Moser KM. Fiberoptic angioscopy: Role in the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary arterial obstruction. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:844–850.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Beckman D, Solmos B, Herod G, et al. Intraoperative pulmonary angioscopy using the flexible fiberoptic choledochoscope. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;41:563–564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Morshuis WJ, Jansen EW, Vincent JG, et al. Intraoperative fiberoptic angioscopy to evaluate the completeness of pulmonary embolectomy. J Cardiovasc Surg 1989;30:630–634.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tomaru T, Uchida Y, Nakamura F, et al. Enhancement of arterial thrombolysis with native tissue type plasminogen activator by pretreatment with heparin or batroxobin: An angioscopic study. Am Heart J 1989;117:275–281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Neville RF, Yasuhara H, Watanabe BI, et al. Endovascular management of arterial intimal defects: An experimental comparison by arteriography, angioscopy, and intravascular ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:496–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hernandez-Maldonad JJ, Padberg FT, Teehan E, et al. Arterial intimal flaps: A comparison of primary repair, aspirin, and endovascular excision in an experimental model. J Trauma 1993;34:565–570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Parent FN, Gandhi RH, Wheeler JR, et al. Angioscopic evaluation of valvular disruption during in situ saphenous vein bypass. Ann Vasc Surg 1994;8:24–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Uchida Y, Tomaru T, Kato E, et al. Angioscopy of blood flow through stenotic arteries: Rheologic mechanism of thrombosis. Am Heart J 1987;114:1504–1506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Stonebridge PA, Brophy CM. Spiral laminar flow in arteries? Lancet 1991;338:1360–1361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Uchida Y, Nakamura F, Tomaru T, et al. Angiographic and angioscopic observations of the arterial luminal changes induced by vasospasm. Am Heart J 1987;114:1096–1101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lee G, Beerline D, Lee MH, et al. Hazards of angioscopic examination: Documentation of damage to the arterial intima. Am Heart J 1988;116:1530–1536.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hashizume M, Yang Y, Galt S, et al. Intimal response of saphenous vein to intraluminal trauma by simulated angioscopic insertion. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:862–868.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hsiang YN, Fragoso M, Lundkist A, et al. The natural history of intimal flaps caused by angioscopy. Ann Vasc Surg 1992;6:38–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kwolek CJ, Miller A, Stonebridge PA, et al. Safety of saline irrigation for angioscopy: Results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Vasc Surg 1992;6:62–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Van Stiegmann G, Pearce WH, Bartle EJ, et al. Flexible angioscopy seems faster and more specific than arteriography. Arch Surg 1987;122:279–282.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • William C. Pevec
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of CaliforniaSacramento

Personalised recommendations