Skip to main content
Log in

Intracoronary Imaging for Bypass Graft Assessment and Intervention

  • Intravascular Imaging (A.G. Truesdell, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Reveiw

To compile knowledge of expected intravascular imaging findings in coronary venous and arterial bypass grafts, both at baseline and in diseased states in order to improve understanding of the pathology demonstrated in failing grafts. Also, to learn how intravascular imaging could be used to guide necessary graft interventions and to consider whether imaging practices in grafts could become formalized or potentially influence outcomes of graft interventions, which are notoriously poor.

Recent Findings

Disease in saphenous vein grafts has features overlapping with pathology in native vessels, but can also involve unique findings which have been described in studies and can be delineated well with intravascular imaging. The latter has also been used successfully to examine findings in internal mammary as well as radial artery grafts, particularly in the peri-operative period. Previously reported cases, as well as a case example here, show the feasibility and potential utility of these imaging modalities within grafts to guide coronary intervention.

Summary

Intravascular imaging within bypass grafts is feasible and expected findings can be recognized and understood with review of existing data and with clinical experience gained in individual operator practice. Future directions could explore guidelines for imaging-guided intervention within bypass grafts and could examine whether outcomes could be improved with intravascular imaging guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Reproduced with permission from Adlam et al.

Fig. 2

Reproduced with permission from Adlam et al.

Fig. 3

Reproduced with permission from Davlouros et al.

Fig. 4

Reproduced with permission from Davlouros et al.

Fig. 5

Reproduced with permission from Brown et al. [10]

Fig. 6

Reproduced with permission from Brown et al. [10]

Fig. 7

Reproduced with permission from Porto et al. [13]

Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Willard JE, Netto D, Demian SE, Haagen DR, Brickner ME, Eichhorn EJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of saphenous vein grafts in vitro: comparison with histologic and quantitative angiographic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19(4):759–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kobayashi T, Makuuchi H, Naruse Y, Sato T, Fujiki T, Ninomiya M, et al. Assessment of saphenous vein graft wall characteristics with intravascular ultrasound imaging. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;46(8):701–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. • Adlam D, Antoniades C, Lee R, Diesch J, Shirodaria C, Taggart D, et al. OCT characteristics of saphenous vein graft atherosclerosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(7):807–9. Excellent imaging examples included and includes comparison images between the modalities of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography inside saphenous nein grafts in an asymptomatic post-bypass conhort.

  4. Pregowski J, Tyczynski P, Mintz GS, Kim SW, Witkowski A, Waksman R, et al. Incidence and clinical correlates of ruptured plaques in saphenous vein grafts: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(12):1974–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Canos DA, Mintz GS, Berzingi CO, Apple S, Kotani J, Pichard AD, et al. Clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound characteristics of early saphenous vein graft failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(1):53–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Collins MJ, Li X, Lv W, Yang C, Protack CD, Muto A, et al. Therapeutic strategies to combat neointimal hyperplasia in vascular grafts. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2012;10(5):635–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzalo N, Serruys PW, Piazza N, Regar E. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) in secondary revascularisation: stent and graft assessment. EuroIntervention. 2009;5(Suppl D):D93–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy GJ, Angelini GD. Insights into the pathogenesis of vein graft disease: lessons from intravascular ultrasound. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2004;2:8

  9. Wallitt EJ, Jevon M, Hornick PI. Therapeutics of vein graft intimal hyperplasia: 100 years on. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(1):317–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown EN, Burris NS, Gu J, Kon ZN, Laird P, Kallam S, et al. Thinking inside the graft: applications of optical coherence tomography in coronary artery bypass grafting. J Biomed Opt. 2007;12(5):051704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. •• Davlouros P, Damelou A, Karantalis V, Xanthopoulou I, Mavronasiou E, Tsigkas G, et al. Evaluation of culprit saphenous vein graft lesions with optical coherence tomography in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(6):683–93. Among the larger and more detailed series describing intravascular imaging findings in failed saphenous vein grafts in the context of acute coronary syndromes. Includes excellent actual imaging examples cross-referenced with angiography and also highlights pathologic findings differing from those in native coronaries.

  12. Brazio PS, Laird PC, Xu C, Gu J, Burris NS, Brown EN, et al. Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery for harvest of radial artery conduits: reduced risk of spasm and intimal injury on optical coherence tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(5):1302–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Porto I, Gaudino M, De Maria GL, Di Vito L, Vergallo R, Bruno P, et al. Long-term morphofunctional remodeling of internal thoracic artery grafts: a frequency-domain optical coherence tomography study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(3):269–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Citarella A, Sheik, A.S., Chowdhary, S., Nwaejike, N. Evaluation of conduit in total arterial revascularization using optical coherence tomography (OCT) - a case report and literature review. Authorea. 2020.

  15. • Wolny R, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Ishida M, Fan Y, Fall KN, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of in-stent restenosis in saphenous vein grafts. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(7):1052–9. Highlights imaging-based findings/culprit pathology specifically in the context of in-stent restenosis within saphenous vein grafts.

  16. Xenogiannis I, Lin D, Lesser JR, Hall AB, Cavalcante JL, Brilakis ES, et al. Finding the culprit: combining cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with optical coherence tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(20):2106–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allison B. Hall.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Allison Hall reports personal fees from Medtronic and personal fees from OpSens Medical, outside the submitted work.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Intravascular Imaging

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hall, A.B. Intracoronary Imaging for Bypass Graft Assessment and Intervention. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 14, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-021-09559-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-021-09559-1

Keywords

Navigation