Conclusions
This paper has extended the EMH to encompass multiple contracts with different expectational horizons. A time series model was estimated for agricultural commodities using a methodology which explicitly accounts for the presence of overlapping data in the samples. The empirical evidence points to the conclusion that the relationships between spot and futures prices over different contracts that are traded simultaneously do not conform to the predictions of the EMH. Past forecast errors of contracts of different maturities can then be exploited by market participants to make trading decisions about these contracts. This finding is of importance, given the emergence of recent literature on the decline of sources of information in the agricultural sector (Just 1983; Gardner 1983) and does not confirm Working's (1942) and Just's (1983) theoretical supposition that futures prices can provide market participants with the necessary information when making forecasts about spot prices for agricultural commodities. The results, moreover, suggest that future research on hedging strategies needs to incorporate the informational content of the multi-contract relationships that exist in these markets.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson RW, Danthine JP (1981) Cross-hedging. Journal of Political Economy 89:1182–1196
Bigman D, Goldfarb D, Schectman E (1983) Futures market efficiency and the time content of the information sets. The Journal of Futures Markets 3:321–334
Bilson JFO (1981) The “speculative efficiency” hypothesis. Journal of Business 54:435–451
Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1970) Time series analysis, forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco
Canarella G, Pollard SK (1985) Efficiency of commodity futures: a vector autoregression analysis. The Journal of Futures Markets 5:67–76
Canarella G, Pollard SK (1986) The efficiency of the London metal exchange: a test with overlapping and non-overlapping data. Journal of Banking and Finance 10:573–593
Frenkel JA (1980) Tests of rational expectations in the forward exchange market. Southern Economic Journal 46:1093–1101
Galbraith RF, Galbraith JI (1974) On the inverses of some patterned matricies arising in the theory of stationary time series. Journal of Applied Probability 11:63–71
Gardner B (1983) Fact and fiction in the public data budget crunch. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65:882–888
Hansen LP, Hodrick RJ (1980) Forward exchange rates as optimal predictors of future spot rates: an econometric analysis. Journal of Political Economy 88
Hsieh DA, Kulatilaka N (1982) Rational expectations and risk premia in forward markets: primary metals at the London metal exchange. Journal of Finance 37:1199–1207
Just RE (1983) The impact of less data on the agricultural economy and society. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65:872–881
Just RE, Rausser GC (1981) Commodity price forecasting with large scale econometric models and the futures market. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63:197–208
Kofi TA (1973) A framework for comparing the efficiency of futures markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 55:584–594
Leuthold RM (1974) The price performance of the futures markets of a nonstorable commodity: live beef cattle. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56:271–279
Martin L, Garcia P (1981) The price performance of futures markets for live cattle and hogs: a disaggregated analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63:209–215
Pesaran MH, Slater LJ (1980) Dynamic regression: theory and algorithms. Ellis Horwood Limited, West Sussex, England
Working J (1942) Quotations on commodity futures as price forecasts. Econometrica 10:39–52
Zarnowitz V (1985) Rational expectations and macroeconomic forecasts. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3:293–311
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Canarella, G., Pollard, S.K. Test of the efficiency of commodity futures in a multi-contract framework. Empirical Economics 12, 67–78 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01972330
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01972330