Abstract
Five enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and two Western blot (WB) commercial kits were compared for their ability to detect antibodies toBorrelia burgdorferi. The panel of 53 test sera consisted of 25 sera positive for antibodies toBorrelia burgdorferi, 15 sera negative for such antibodies, 5 sera reactive in serologic tests for syphilis, and 8 sera containing antinuclear antibodies and/or rheumatoid factor. The rate of agreement with reference results was 93 %, 90 %, 90 % and 88 % for EIA kits from Diamedix, Cambridge Biotech, Mardx and Sigma respectively. The sensitivity and specificity was 84 % and 100 % respectively for Cambridge Biotech, 76 % and 94 % for Diamedix, 68 % and 83 % for Mardx, and 68 % and 83 % for Sigma. The three confirmatory tests, Cambridge Biotech WB, General Biometrics P39 EIA and Mardx WB, demonstrated 75 %, 60 % and 63 % agreement respectively. The sensitivity and specificity was 52 % and 100 % respectively for Cambridge Biotech WB, 24 % and 100 % for General Biometrics P39 EIA, and 44 % and 100 % for Mardx WB. The results demonstrate the variable performance of commercial serologic kits for detection of antibodies toBorrelia burgdorferi. WB appears to be a better confirmatory test than the single protein EIA.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Steere AC Medical progress: Lyme disease. New England Journal of Medicine 1989, 321: 586–596.
Steere AC, Grodzicki RL, Kornblatt AN, Craft JE, Barbour AG, Burgdorfer W, Schmid GP, Johnson E, Malawista SE The spirochetal etiology of Lyme disease. New England Journal of Medicine 1983, 308: 733–740.
Benach JL, Bosler EM, Hanrahan JP, Coleman JL, Bast TE, Habicht GS, Cameron DJ, Ziegler JL, Burgdorfer W, Barbour AG, Edelman R, Kaslow RA Spirochetes isolated from the blood of two patients with Lyme disease. New England Journal of Medicine 1983, 308: 740–742.
Steere AC, Grodzicki RL, Craft JE, Shrestra M, Kornblatt AN, Malawista SE Recovery of Lyme disease spirochetes from patients. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1984, 57: 557–560.
Dorward DW, Schwan TG, Garon CF Immune capture and detection ofBorrelia burgdorferi antigens in urine, blood, or tissues from infected ticks, mice, dogs, and humans. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 1162–1170.
Hyde FW, Johnson RC, White TJ, Shelburne CE Detection of antigens in urine of mice and humans infected withBorrelia burgdorferi. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1989, 27: 58–61.
Debue M, Gautier P, Hackel C, Van Elsen A, Herzog A, Bigaignon A, Bollen A Detection ofBorrelia burgdorferi in biological samples using the polymerase chain reaction. Research in Microbiology 1991, 142: 565–572.
Goodman JL, Jurkovich P, Kramber JM, Johnson RC Molecular detection of persistentBorrelia burgdorferi in the urine of infected patients with active Lyme disease. Infection and Immunity 1991, 59: 269–278.
Melchers W, Meis J, Rosa P, Claas E, Nohlmans L, Koopman R, Horrevorts A, Galama J Amplification ofBorrelia burgdorferi DNA in skin biopsies from patients with Lyme disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 2401–2406.
Barbour AG Laboratory aspects of Lyme borreliosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1988, 1: 399–414.
Burgdorfer W, Barbour AG, Hayes SF, Benach JL, Grunwaldt E, Davis JP Lyme disease — a tick-borne spirochetosis? Science 1982, 216: 1317–1319.
Craft JE, Grodzicki RL, Shrestha M, Fischer DK, Garcia-Blanco M, Steere AC The antibody response in Lyme disease. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1984, 57: 561–565.
Craft JE, Grodzicki RL, Steere AC Antibody response in Lyme disease: evaluation of diagnostic tests. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1984, 149: 789–795.
Cutler SJ, Wright DJM Comparison of immunofluorescence and enzyme linked immunosorbent assays for diagnosing Lyme disease. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1989, 42: 869–871.
Magnarelli LA, Meegan JM, Anderson JF, Chappell WA Comparison of an indirect fluorescent-antibody test with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serological studies of Lyme disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1984, 20: 181–184.
Wilkinson H Immunodiagnostic tests for Lyme disease. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1984, 57: 567–572.
Berardi VP, Weeks KG, Steere AC Serodiagnosis of early Lyme disease: analysis of IgM and IgG antibody responses by using an antibody-capture enzyme immunoassay. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1988, 158: 754–760.
Coleman JL, Benach JL Isolation of antigenic components from the Lyme disease spirochete: their role in early diagnosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1987, 155: 756–765.
Hansen K, Hindersson P, Pedersen NS Measurement of antibodies to theBorrelia burgdorferi flagellum improves serodiagnosis of Lyme disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988, 26: 338–346.
Hansen K, Pii K, Lebech A Improved immunoglobulin M serodiagnosis in Lyme borreliosis by using a μ-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with biotinylatedBorrelia burgdorferi flagella. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 166–173.
Feder HM, Gerber MA, Luger SW, Ryan RW False positive serologic tests for Lyme disease after varicella infection. New England Journal of Medicine 1991, 325: 1886–1887.
Magnarelli LA, Anderson JF, Johnson RC Cross-reactivity in serological tests for Lyme disease and other spirochetal infections. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1987, 156: 183–188.
Craft JE, Fischer DK, Shimamoto GT, Steere AC Antigens ofBorrelia burgdorferi recognized during Lyme disease. Appearance of a new immunoglobulin M response and expansion of the immunoglobulin G response late in the illness. Journal of Clinical Investigation 1986, 78: 934–939.
Grodzicki RL, Steere AC Comparison of immunoblotting and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using different antigen preparations for diagnosing early Lyme disease. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1988, 157: 790–797.
Karlsson M, Mollegard I, Stiernstedt G, Wretlind B Comparison of Western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1989, 8: 871–877.
Simpson WJ, Schrumpf ME, Schwan TG Reactivity of human Lyme borreliosis sera with a 39-kilodalton antigen specific toBorrelia burgdorferi. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1329–1337.
Berger BW, Johnson RC, Kodner C, Coleman L Cultivation ofBorrelia burgdorferi from erythema migrans lesions and perilesional skin. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 359–361.
Christenson VD, White DH Evaluation of four commercially available EIA assays for the serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 1991, 5: 340–343.
Fister RD, Weymouth LA, McLaughlin JC, Ryan RW, Tilton RC Comparative evaluation of three products for the detection ofBorrelia burgdorferi antibody in human serum. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1989, 27: 2834–2837.
Ma B, Christen B, Leung D, Vigo-Pelfrey C Serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis by Western immunoblot: reactivity of various significant antibodies againstBorrelia burgdorferi. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 370–376.
Cluss RG, Boothby JT Thermoregulation of protein synthesis inBorrelia burgdorferi. Infection and Immunity 1990, 58: 1038–1042.
Gassmann GS, Duetzman R, Vogt A, Goebel UB N-terminal amino acid sequence of theBorrelia burgdorferi flagellum. FEMS Microbiology Letters 1989, 51: 101–105.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmitz, J.L., Powell, C.S. & Folds, J.D. Comparison of seven commercial kits for detection of antibodies toBorrelia burgdorferi . Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 12, 419–424 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01967435
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01967435