Abstract
For land outside the sea-dikes of the northern part of the province of Friesland five alternative land-reclamation plans have been made. Agricultural organizations and the Province are in favour of the larger plans because of their expected economic benefits, which mainly accrue to arable farming — wholesale and processing. Environmental organizations are against these plans because of the expected damage to the valuable natural environment of the Dutch Shallows. The plans proposed primarily serve regional interests, have large indirect economic effects, and are finally decided upon by central government. It is argued that for an economic evaluation of such projects an integrated interregional cost-benefit and input-output analysis is most adequate. Under the present Dutch administrative and financial lack of decentralization, it appears to make a great difference whether the cost-benefit analyses are made from a regional point of veiw or made from the more usual national standpoint.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dasgupta, A. K. and Pearce, D. W. 1972.Cost-benefit analysis: theory and practice. London: Macmillan.
Eerste deelrapport van de Werkgroep. 1974. Normen en waarden voor kostenbaten analyses: kosten-baten analyse 1.Beleidsanalyse 1: 2–44.
Federation of Northern Economic Institutes. 1977.Economische structuurschets noorden des lands. Assen.
Klaassen, L. H. and Botterweg, T. H. 1976. Project evaluation and intangible effects: a shadow approach. InEnvironmental Economics 1, Theories, ed. P. Nijkamp. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 33–49.
National Association for Conservation of the Shallows. 1975.Noord-Friesland Buitendijks. Harlingen.
National Association for the Conservation of the Shallows. 1978.Noord-Friesland Buitendijks: Antwoordnota. Harlingen.
National Department for the Maintenances of Dikes etc. 1979.Analyse plan indijking Zwarte Haan-Holwerd. The Hague.
Nijkamp, P. and van Delft, A. 1977.Multi-criteria analysis and regional decision making. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Oosterhaven, J. 1979.Construction of an interregional input-output table for the North, the Rijnmond area and the rest of the Netherlands for 1970. University of Groningen, Institute of Economic Research, Memorandum No. 54.
Oosterhaven, J. 1981a.Interregional input-output analysis and Dutch regional policy problems. Aldershot: Gower.
Oosterhaven, J. 1981b.Some comments on the regional attraction model. University of Groningen, Institute of Economic Reserch, Memorandum No. 88.
Oosterhaven, J., Vos, E., Dijkhuizen, R. and Tamminga, M. 1981.Interregionale kosten-baten en input-output analyse: een toepassing op indijkingsplannen voor Nord-Friesland. University of Groningen, Institute of Economic Research, Memorandum No. 79.
Rapport van de Werkgroep Onderzoek Dijkverhoging Zwarte Haan-Ternaarder Polder met een Drietal Varianttrace's. 1975. Brought out to the Gedeputeerde Staten of the Province of Friesland, Leeuwarden.
Rapport van de Werkgroep onderzoek dijkaanleg Zwarte Haan-Holwerd: fase 2. 1980. Brought out to the Gedeputeerde Staten of the Province of Friesland, Leeuwarden.
Tweede deelrapport van de werkgroep. 1975. Normen en waarden voor kosten-baten analyses: Meten en Waarderen.Beleidsanalyse 4: 9–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oosterhaven, J. Evaluating land reclamation plans for Northern Friesland: An interregional cost-benefit and input-output analysis. Papers of the Regional Science Association 52, 125–137 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01944098
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01944098