Skip to main content
Log in

Immunochemical similarities among the hemolymph juvenile hormone binding proteins of moths

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hemolymph from various species of moths was analyzed for cross-reactivity with a panel of six monoclonal antibodies made against the hemolymph juvenile hormone binding protein ofManduca sexta. With the exception of one antibody, the immunoreactivity was limited to the sphingid family. One monoclonal antibody cross-reacted with a number of lepidopteran species; however, families such as Noctuidae and Pyralidae, known to have high affinity, low molecular weight juvenile hormone binding proteins, did not cross-react. Immunological cross-reactivity withManduca sexta juvenile hormone binding protein in several primitive moth families supports the current model of phylogenetic relationships in the order Lepidoptera.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goodman, W. G., in: Morphogenetic Hormones of Arthropods, pp. 83–124. Ed. A. P. Gupta. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goodman, W. G., and Chang, E. S., in: Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, vol. 7, pp. 491–510. Eds G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Koeppe, J. K., and Kovalick, G. E., in: Biochemical Actions of Hormones, vol. 13, pp. 266–304. Ed. G. Litwack. Academic Perss, Orlando 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hodges, R. W., Checklist of the Lepidoptera of America North of Mexico. E. W. Classey Ltd, London 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lammeli, U. K., Nature227 (1970) 680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hames, B. D., in: Introduction to Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis, pp. 1–91. Eds B. D. Hames and D. Rickwood. IRL Press, Oxford 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodman, W. G., Park, Y. C., and Johnson, J., Insect Biochem.20 (1990) 611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hancock, K., and Tsang, V. C. W., Analyt. Biochem.133 (1983) 157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schooley, D. A., Baker, F. C., Tsai, L. W., Miller, C. A., and Jamieson, G. C., in: Biosynthesis, Metabolism and Mode of Action of Invertebrate Hormones, pp. 373–383. Eds J. Hoffmann and M. Porchet. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1984.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryan, R. O., Smidt, J. O., and Law, J. H., Arch. Insect Biochem.1 (1984) 375.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Laver, W. G., Gillian, M. A., Webster, R. G., and Smith-Gill, S. J., Cell61 (1990) 553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brock, J. P., J. nat. Hist.5 (1971) 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Common, I. F. B., A. Rev. Ent.20 (1975) 183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Prestwich, G. D., Science (Wash. D. C.)237 (1987) 999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Covell, C. V., A Field Guide to the Moths of Eastern North America. Houghton Mifflin, Boston 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodman, W.G., Maxfield, B. & Park, Y.C. Immunochemical similarities among the hemolymph juvenile hormone binding proteins of moths. Experientia 47, 945–948 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01929888

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01929888

Key words

Navigation