Skip to main content
Log in

Phosphorylation of cockroach antennal polypeptides: effects of second messengers and pheromonal blend

  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In insect antennal extracts, Schleicher et al.1 showed that protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors abolish the transience of pheromone-induced rapid inositol trisphosphate responses, which suggests that pheromonal signals act on phosphorylation of specific proteins. To confirm this hypothesis, we studied the effects of second messengers and a pheromonal blend on phosphorylation of antennal proteins in the cockroachPeriplaneta americana. Proteins from adult male antennae were phosphorylated in vitro in the presence of [γ32P] triphosphate, then separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Numerous phosphopolypeptides were visualized. The presence of Ca++/calmodulin in the incubation medium resulted in increased phosphorylation of polypeptides with molecular weights of 38, 48, 51, 54 and 58 kDa. Stimulation of PKC by addition of Ca++ phosphatidylserine (PS)/phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) resulted in the appearance of three phosphopolypeptides of 36, 70 and 120 kDa. In the presence of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, two new major polypeptides of 46 and 42 kDa appeared; the latter polypeptide also appeared in the presence of cyclic guanosine monophosphate. Comparison with polypeptide composition of tissue from the cerci, leg, brain and fat body showed that the 36 and 48 kDa polypeptides were specific to antennae, whereas the 120 kDa polypeptide was also present in the adult brain. When antennae are subjected to pheromonal stimulation for 16 seconds prior to homogenization, in vitro phosphorylation of the 120, 70, 64 and 38 kDa polypeptides was inhibited, whereas phosphorylation of the 58, 54, 51 and 48 kDa polypeptides was strongly stimulated. It is noteworthy that a 107 kDa polypeptide was observed only after pheromonal stimulation by Ca++/PS/PMA. Our findings suggest that Ca++-and PKC-dependent protein phosphorylation systems play an important role in the transduction of pheromonal signals in antennae of male cockroachP. americana. We speculate that specific phosphoproteins may modulate sensitivity and signal amplification during the olfactory transduction process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schleicher, S., Boekhoff, I., Konietzko, U., and Breer, H., J. Comp. Physiol. B164 (1994) 76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ache, B. W., Seminars in “Cell Biology”5 (1994) 55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Breer, H., Cell Biology5 (1994) 25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boekhoff, I., Michel, W. C., Breer, H., and Ache, B. W., J. Neurosci.14 (1994) 3304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hatt, H., and Ache, B. W., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA91 (1994) 6264.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Breer, H., Boekhoff, I., Strotmann, J., Raming, K., and Tareilus, E., in: Information Processing of Chemical Sensory Stimuli in Biological and Artificial Systems, p. 77. Ed. D. Schild, Springer, Berlin 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boekhoff, I., Strotmann, J., Raming, K., Tareilus, E., and Breer, H., Cell. Signal.2 (1990) 49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boekhoff, I., Seifert, E., Göggerle, S., Lindemann, M., Krüger, B.-W., and Breer, H., Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol.23 (1993) 757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Breer, H., Raming, K., and Boekhoff, I., Naturwissenschaften75 (1988) 627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boekhoff, I., Raming, K., and Breer, H., J. Comp. Physiol. B160 (1990) 99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ziegelberger, G., van der Berg, M. J., Kaissling, K. E., Klumpp, S., and Schultz, J. E., J. Neurosc.10 (1990) 1217.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zufall, F., and Hatt, H., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA88 (1991) 8520.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zufall, F., Firestein, S., and Shepherd, G. M., Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.23 (1994) 577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shirsat, N., and Siddiqi, O., Current Opinion in Neurobiology3 (1993) 553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Breer, H., and Shepherd, G. M., TINS16 (1993) 5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Walaas, S. I., and Greengard, P., Pharmacol. Rev.43 (1991). 299.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hawkins, W. A., and Rust, M. K., J. Chem. Ecol.3 (1977) 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saas, H., J. Comp. Physiol.152 (1983) 309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bradford, H. M., Anal. Biochem.65 (1976) 248.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Laemmli, U. K., Nature227 (1970) 680.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Parmentier, M., Vanderhaeghen, P., Schurmans, S., Libert, F., and Vassart, G., M/S10 (1994) 1083.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Breer, H., J. Steroid Biochem. Molec. Biol.29 (1991) 621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaissling, K.-E., and Boekhoff, I., in: Sensory Systems of Arthropods, p. 489. Eds K. Wieser, F. G. Gribakin, A. V. Popov and G. Renninger. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Michel, W. C., and Ache, B. W., J. Neurosc.12 (1992) 3979.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krieger, J., Gänble, H., Raming, K., and Breer, H., Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol.23 (1993) 449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vogt, R. G., Riddiford, L. M., and Prestwich, G. D., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA82 (1985) 8827.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Degrelle, F., Tirard, A., Strambi C., Renucci, M., and Strambi, A., J. Insect Physiol.40 (1994) 293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hesse, J., and Marmé, D., Insect Biochem.15 (1985) 835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelly, L. E., Comp. Biochem. Physiol.69B (1981) 61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Tirard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Renucci, M., Tirard, A., Sreng, L. et al. Phosphorylation of cockroach antennal polypeptides: effects of second messengers and pheromonal blend. Experientia 52, 762–768 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01923986

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01923986

Key words

Navigation