Abstract
Associations with ants, termed myrmecophily, are widespread in the butterfly family Lycaenidae and range from mere co-existence to more or less specific mutualistic or even parasitic interactions. Secretions of specialized epidermal glands are crucial for mediating the interactions. Transfer of nutrients (carbohydrates, amino acids) from butterfly larvae to ants plays a major role, but manipulative communication with the help of odour signals is also involved. By means of myrmecophily, lycaenid butterflies largely escape ant predation, and certain species gain protection through attendant ants or achieve developmental benefits from ant-attendance. Benefits to the ants range from minimal to substantial food rewards. While most lycaenid species maintain facultative relationships with a variety of ant genera, highly specific and obligatory associations have convergently evolved in a number of butterfly lineages. As a corollary, communication systems are largely unspecific in the former, but may be highly specialized in the latter. The sophisticated communication between obligate myrmecophiles and their host ants is tightly connected with the evolutionary rise of specialized life-cycles and thus is a source of augmenting diversity within the butterflies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Ackery, P. R., Biocontrol potential of African lycaenid butterflies entomophagous on Homoptera. J. Afr. Zool.104 (1990) 581–591.
Agosti, D., Revision of the Oriental ant genusCladomyrma, with an outline of the higher classification of the Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst. Ent.16 (1991) 293–310.
Atsatt, P. R., Lycaenid butterflies and ants: selection for enemy-free space. Am. Nat.118 (1981) 638–654.
Atsatt, P. R., Ant-dependent food plant selection of the mistletoe butterflyOgyris amaryllis (Lycaenidae). Oecologia48 (1981) 60–63.
Ballmer, G. R., and Pratt G. F., Quantification of ant attendance (myrmecophily) of lycaenid larvae. J. Res. Lepid.30 (1992) 95–112.
Baylis, M., and Pierce, N. E., The effects of ant mutualism on the foraging and diet of lycaenid caterpillars, in: Caterpillars — ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging, pp. 404–421. Eds. N. E. Stamp and T. M. Casey. Chapman and Hall, New York/London 1993.
Burghardt, F., Untersuchungen zum Einfluß der Futterqualität auf die Myrmekophilie von Bläulingsraupen. Diplom thesis, University of Würzburg, 1994.
Callaghan, C. J., Notes on the biology of a myrmecophilous African lycaenid,Aphnaeus adamsi Stempffer (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Bull. Soc. ent. Fr.97 (1993) 339–342.
Cammaerts, R., Stimuli inducing the regurgitation of the workers ofLasius flavus (Formicidae) upon the myrmecophilous beetleClaviger testaceus (Pselaphidae). Behav. Proc.28 (1992) 81–96.
Cammaerts, R., and Cammaerts, M.-C., Response of the myrmecophilous beetleEdaphopaussus favieri (Carabidae, Paussinae) to 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethylpyrazine, the only known component of its host trail pheromone, in: Biology and evolution of social insects, pp. 211–216. Ed. J. Billen Leuven University Press, Leuven 1992.
Cammaerts, R., Detrain, C., and Cammaerts, M.-C., Host trail following by the myrmecophilous beetleEdaphopaussus favieri (Fairmaire) (Carabidae Paussinae). Insect Soc.37 (1990) 200–211.
Claassens, A. J. M., and Dickson, C. G. C., A study of the myrmecophilous behaviour of the immature stages ofAloeides thyra (L.) (Lep: Lycaenidae) with special reference to the function of the retractile tubercles and with additional notes on the general biology of the species. Ent. Rec. J. Var.89 (1977) 225–231.
Cottrell, C. B., Aphytophagy in butterflies: its relationship to myrmecophily. Zool. J. Linn. Soc.79 (1984) 1–57.
Cottrell, C. B., The extraordinaryLiphyra butterfly. Transv. Mus. Bull.22 (1987) 5–12.
Cushman, J. H., Rashbrook V. K., and Beattie, A. J., Assessing benefits to both participants in a lycaenid-ant association. Ecology75 (1994) 1031–1041.
Dejean, A., Nkongmeneck, B., Corbara, B., and Djieto-Lordon, C., Impact des fourmis arboricoles sur une pullulation d'Achaea catocaloides (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) dans des plantations de cacaoyers du Cameroun, et étude de leurs Homoptères associés. Act. Oecol.12 (1991) 471–488.
DeVries, P. J., The larval ant-organs ofThisbe irenea (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae) and their effects upon attending ants. Zool. J. Linn. Soc.94 (1988) 379–393.
DeVries, P. J., Enhancement of symbioses between butterfly caterpillars and ants by vibrational communication. Science248 (1990) 1104–1106.
DeVries, P. J., Call production by myrmecophilous riodinid and lycaenid butterfly caterpillars (Lepidoptera): morphological, acoustical, functional, and evolutionary patterns. Am. Mus. Novit3025 (1991) 1–23.
DeVries, P. J., Evolutionary and ecological patterns in myrmecophilous riodinid butterflies, in: Ant-plant interactions, pp. 143–156. Eds. C. R. Huxley and D. F. Cutler, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991.
DeVries, P. J., Mutualism betweenThisbe irenea butterflies and ants, and the role of ant ecology in the evolution of larval-ant associations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc.43 (1991) 179–195.
DeVries, P. J., Thomas, J. A., and Cocroft, R., A comparison of acoustical signals betweenMaculinea butterfly caterpillars and their obligate host ant species. Biol. J. Linn. Soc.49 (1993) 229–238.
Downey, J. C., Thrips utilize exudations of Lycaenidae. Ent. News76 (1965) 25–27.
Downey, J. C., and Allyn, A. C., Butterfly ultrastructure. 1. Sound production and associated abdominal structures in pupae of Lycaenidae and Riodinidae. Bull. Allyn Mus.14 (1973) 1–47.
Downey, J. C., and Allyn, A. C., Sounds produced in pupae of Lycaenidae. Bull. Allyn Mus.48 (1978) 1–14.
Ehrhardt, R., Über die Biologie und Histologie der myrmekophilen Organe vonLycaena orion. Ber. naturf. Ges. Freiburg20 (1914) 90–98.
Elfferich, N. W., Enige opmerkingen over de biologie vanPlebejus argus L. (Lep., Lycaenidae). Entomol. Ber. Amsterdam25 (1965) 26–31.
Elmes, G. W., Thomas, J. A., Hammarsted, O., Munguira, M. L., Martin, J., and van der Made, J. G., Differences in host-ant specificity between Spanish, Dutch and Swedish populations of the endangered butterfly,Maculinea alcon (Denis et Schiff.) (Lepidoptera). Memorabilia Zool.48 (1994 55–68.
Elmes, G. W., Thomas, J. A., and Wardlaw, J. C., Larvae ofMaculinea rebeli, a large-blue butterfly and theirMyrmica host ants: wild adoption and behaviour in ant-nests. J. Zool. Lond.223 (1991) 447–460.
Elmes, G. W., Wardlaw, J. C., and Thomas, J. A., Larvae ofMaculinea rebeli, a large-blue butterfly and theirMyrmica host ants: patterns of caterpillar growth and survival. J. Zool. Lond.224 (1991) 79–92.
Farquharson, C. O., Five years' observations (1914–1918) on the bionomics of Southern Nigerian insects, chiefly directed to the investigation of lycaenid life-histories and to the relation of Lycaenidae, Diptera, and other insects to ants (ed. E. B. Poulton). Trans. ent. Soc. Lond.1921 (1922) 319–448.
Fiedler, K., Die Beziehungen von Bläulingspuppen (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) zu Ameisen (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Nachr. ent. Ver. Apollo Frankfurt, N. F.9 (1988) 33–58.
Fiedler, K., New information on the biology ofMaculinea nausithous andM. teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Nota lepid.12 (1990) 246–256.
Fiedler, K., Effects of larval diet on the myrmecophilous qualities ofPolyommatus icarus caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Oecologia83 (1990) 284–287.
Fiedler, K., Systematic, evolutionary, and ecological implications of myrmecophily within the Lycaenidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Bonner zool. Monogr.31 (1991) 1–210.
Fiedler, K., Lycaenid butterflies and plants: is myrmecophily associated with amplified hostplant diversity? Ecol. Ent.19 (1994) 79–82.
Fiedler, K., Lycaenid butterflies and plants: is myrmecophily associated with particular hostplant prefenreces. Ethol. Ecol. Evol.7 (1995) 107–132.
Fiedler, K., Life-history patterns of myrmecophilous butterflies and other insects: their implications on tropical species diversity, in: Proceedings of the international symposium on biodiversity and systematics in tropical ecosystems, in press Ed. H. Ulrich, Museum A. Koenig, Bonn 1995.
Fiedler, K., and Hagemann, D. The influence of larval age and ant number on myrmecophilous interactions of the African Grass Blue butterfly,Zizeeria knysna (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J. Res. Lepid.31 (1995) in press.
Fiedler, K., and Hölldobler, B., Ants andPolyommatus icarus immatures (Lycaenidae) — sex-related developmental benefits and costs of ant attendance. Oecologia91 (1992) 468–473.
Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., Functional analysis of the myrmecophilous relationships between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). II. Lycaenid larvae as trophobiotic partners of ants — a quantitative approach. Oecologia75 (1988) 204–206.
Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., Functional analysis of the myrmecophilous relationships between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). III. New aspects of the function of the retractile tentacular organs of lycaenid larvae. Zool. Beitr. Berlin, N. F.31 (1988) 409–416.
Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., Functional analysis of the myrmecophilous relationships between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). I. Release of food recruitment in ants by lycaenid larvae and pupae. Ethology80 (1989) 71–80.
Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., The symbiosis between the weaver ant,Oecophylla smaragdina, andAnthene emolus, an obligate myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly. J. nat. Hist.23 (1989) 833–846.
Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., Adult myrmecophily in butterflies: the role of the antAnoplolepis longipes in the feeding and oviposition behaviour ofAllotinus unicolor. Tyô to Ga40 (1989) 241–251.
Fiedler, K., and Saam, C., Does ant-attendance influence development in 5 European Lycaenidae butterfly species? (Lepidoptera). Nota lepid.17 (1994) 5–24.
Fiedler, K., Schurian, K. G., and Hahn, M., The life-history and myrmecophily ofPolyommatus candalus (Herrich-Schäffer) from Turkey (Lep., Lycaenidae). Linneana Belg.14 (1994) 315–332.
Fiedler, K., Seufert, P., Pierce, N. E., Pearson, J. G., and Baumgarten, H.-T., Exploitation of lycaenid-ant mutualisms by braconid parasitoids. J. Res. Lepid. (in press).
Gilbert, L. E., Adult resources in butterflies: African lycaenidMegalopalpus feeds on larval nectary. Biotropica8 (1976) 282–283.
Henning, S. F., Biological groups within the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). J. Entomol. Soc. Sth. Afr.46 (1983) 65–85.
Henning, S. F., Chemical communication between lycaenid larvae (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. entomol. Soc. sth. Afr.46 (1983) 341–366.
Heppner, J. B., Faunal regions and the diversity of Lepidoptera. Trop. Lepid.2 Suppl.1 (1991) 1–85.
Hill, C. J., The myrmecophilous organs ofArhopala madytus Fruhstorfer (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J. Aust. entomol. Soc.32 (1993) 283–288.
Hinton, H. E., Myrmecophilous Lycaenidae and other Lepidoptera — a summary. Proc. Trans. sth. Lond., entomol. nat. Hist. Soc.1949–50 (1951) 111–175.
Hochberg, M. E., Clarke, R. T., Elmes, G. W., and Thomas, J. A., Population dynamic consequences of direct and indirect interactions involving a large blue butterfly and its plant and red ant hosts. J. Anim. Ecol.63 (1994) 375–391.
Hochberg, M., Thomas, J. A., and Elmes, G. W., A modelling study of the population dynamics of a large blue butterfly,Maculinea rebeli, a parasite of red ant ant nests. J. Anim. Ecol.61 (1992) 397–409.
Hölldobler, B., Zur Physiologie der Gast-Wirt-Beziehungen (Myrmecophilie) bei Ameisen. I. Das. Gastverhältnis derAtemeles-undLomechusa-Larven (Col. Staphylinidae) zuFormica (Hym. Formicidae). Z. vergl. Physiol.56 (1967) 1–21.
Hölldobler, B., Orientierungsmechanismen des AmeisengastesAtemeles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) bei der Wirtssuche. Zool. Anz. Suppl.33 (1969) 580–585.
Hölldobler, B., Host finding by oder in the myrmecophilic beetleAtemeles publicollis Bris. (Staphylinidae). Science166 (1969) 757–758.
Hölldobler, B., Zur Physiologie der Gast-Wirt-Beziehungen (Myrmecophilie) bei Ameisen. II. Das Gastverhältnis des imaginalenAtemeles pubicollis Bris. (Col. Staphylinidae) zuMyrmica andFormica (Hym. Formicidae). Z. vergl. Physiol.66 (1970) 215–250.
Hölldobler, B., Communication between ants and their guests. Scient. Am.1971 (March) (1971) 86–93.
Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O., The ants. Harvard University Press 1990.
Howard, R. W., Akre, R. D., and Garnett, W. B., Chemical mimicry in an obligate predator of carpenter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am.83 (1990) 607–616.
Howard, R. W., Stanley-Samuelson, D. W., and Akre, R. D., Biosynthesis and chemical mimicry of cuticular hydrocarbons from the obligate predator,Microdon albicomatus Novak (Diptera: Syrphidae) and its ant prey,Myrmica incompleta Provancher (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Kansas ent. Soc.63 (1990) 437–443.
Hummel, V., Untersuchungen zum Einfluß des Dauer einer Ameisenassoziation auf die Sekretabgabe und andere Myrmekophilieparameter der Raupen des BläulingsAricia agestis (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Diplom thesis, University of Würzburg, 1994.
Ito, F., and Higashi, S., Variance of ant effects on the different life forms of moth caterpillars. J. Anim. Ecol.60 (1991) 327–334.
Jackson, T. H. E., The early stages of some African Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera), with an account of their larval habits. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond.86 (1937) 201–238.
Jones, R. E., Ants, parasitoids, and the cabbage butterflyPieris rapae. J. Anim. Ecol.56 (1987) 739–749.
Jordano, D., and Thomas, C. D., Specificity of an ant-lycaenid interaction. Oecologia91 (1992) 431–438.
Jutzeler, D., Weibchen der BläulingsartLycaeides idas L. riechen ihre Wirtsameisen (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Mitt. ent. Ges. Basel. N. F.39 (1989): 95–118.
Jutzeler, D., Kann das Weibchen vonPlebejus argus (Linnaeus, 1761) Ameisen riechen? (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Mitt. ent. Ges. Basel, N. F.39 (1989) 150–159.
Kistner, D. H., The social insects' bestiary, in: Social insects, vol. 3, pp. 1–244. Ed. H. R. Hermann. Academic Press, New York 1982.
Kitching, R. L., and Luke, B., The myrmecophilous organs of the larvae of some Brithis Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a comparative study. J. nat. Hist.19 (1985) 259–276.
Laine, K., and Niemelä, P., The influence of ants on the survival of mountain birches during anOporinia autumnata (Lep., Geometridae) outbreak. Oecologia47 (1980) 39–42.
Lamborn, W. A., On the relationship between certain West African insects, especially ants, Lycaenidae and Homoptera. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond.1913 (1914) 436–524.
Larsen, T. B., and Pittaway, A. R., Notes on the ecology, biology and taxonomy ofApharitis acamas (Klug) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Ent. Gaz.33 (1982) 163–168.
Leimar, O., and Axén, A., Strategic behaviour in an interspecific mutualism: interactions between lycaenid larvae and ants. Anim. Behav.46 (1993) 1177–1182.
Mahdi, T., and Whittaker, J. B., Do birch trees (Betula pendula) grow better if foraged by wood ants?. J. Anim. Ecol.62 (1993) 101–116.
Malicky, H., Versuch einer Analyse der ökologischen Beziehungen zwischen Lycaeniden (Lepidoptera) und Formiciden (Hymenoptera). Tijdschr. Ent.112 (1969) 213–298.
Malicky, H., Unterschiede im Angriffsverhalten vonFormica-Arten (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) gegenüber Lycaenidenraupen (Lepidoptera). Insect Soc.17 (1970) 121–124.
Maschwitz, U., Fiala, B., Moog, J., and Saw, L. G., Two new myrmecophytic associations from the Malay Peninsula: ants of the genusCladomyrma (Formicidae, Camponotinae) as partners ofSaraca thaipingensis (Caesalpiniaceae) andCrypteronia griffithii (Crypteroniaceae). 1. Colony foundation and acquisition of trophobionts. Insect Soc.38 (1991) 27–35.
Maschwitz, U., Nässig, W. A., Dumpert, K., and Fiedler, K., Larval carnivory and myrmecoxeny, and imaginal myrmecophily in miletine lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) on the Malay Peninsula. Tyô to Ga39 (1988) 167–181.
Maschwitz, U., Schroth, M., Hänel, H., and Tho, Y. P., Aspects of the larval biology of myrmecophilous lycaenids from West Malaysia. Nachr. ent. Ver. Apollo Frankfurt. N. F.6 (1985) 181–200.
Maschwitz, U., Wüst, M., and Schurian, K., Bläulingsraupen als Zuckerlieferanten für Ameisen. Oecologia18 (1975) 17–21.
Mathews, J. N. A., Aggregation and mutualism in insect herbivores. Dissertation, University of Oxford, 1993.
Nash, D. R., Cost-benefit analysis of a mutualism between lycaenid butterflies and ants. Dissertation, University of Oxford, 1989.
Peterson, M. A., The nature of ant attendance and the survival of larvalIcaricia acmon (Lycaenidae). J. Lepid. Soc.47 (1993) 8–16.
Pierce, N. E., The ecology and evolution of symbioses between lycaenid butterflies and ants. Dissertation. Harvard University, Cambridge/Massachusetts, 1983.
Pierce, N. E., Amplified species diversity: a case study of an Australian lycaenid butterfly and its attendant ants, in: The biology of butterflies, pp. 197–200. Eds. R. I. Vane-Wright and P. R. Ackery, Academic Press, London 1984.
Pierce, N. E., Lycaenid butterflies and ants: selection for nitrogen-fixing and other protein-rich food plants. Am. Nat.125 (1985) 888–895.
Pierce, N. E., The evolution and biogeography of associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol.4 (1987) 89–116.
Pierce, N. E., Butterfly-ant mutualisms, in: Towards a more exact ecology, pp. 299–324. Eds. P. J. Grubb and J. Whittaker. Blackwell Science Publishers, Oxford 1989.
Pierce, N. E., and Easteal, S., The selective advantage of attendant ants for the larvae of a lycaenid butterfly,Glaucopsyche lygdamus. J. Anim. Ecol.55 (1986) 451–462.
Pierce, N. E., and Elgar, M. A., The influence of ants on host plant selection byJalmenus evagoras, a myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.16 (1985) 209–222.
Pierce, N. E., and Mead, P. S., Parasitoids as selective agents in the symbiosis between lycaenid butterfly larvae and ants. Science112 (1981) 1185–1187.
Pierce, N. E., and Young, W. R., Lycaenid butterflies and ants: two-species stable equilibria in mutualistic, commensal, and parasitic interactions. Am. Nat.128 (1986) 216–227.
Pierce, N. E., Kitching, R. L., Buckley, R. C., Taylor, M. F. J., and Benbow, K. F., The costs and benefits of cooperation between the Australian lycaenid butterfly,Jalmenus evagoras, and its attendant ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.21 (1987) 237–248.
Pierce, N. E., Nash, D. R., Baylis, M., and Carper, E. R. Variation in the attractiveness of lycaenid butterfly larvae to ants, in: Ant-plant interactions, pp. 131–142. Eds. C. R. Huxley and D. F. Cutler. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991.
Pollard, E., and Yates, T. J., Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman and Hall, London 1993.
Quinet, Y., and Pasteels, J. M., Trail following and stowaway behaviour of the myrmecophilous staphylinid beetle,Homoeusa acuminata, during foraging trips of its hostLasius fuliginosus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Soc.42 (1995) 31–44.
Risch, S. J., and Carroll, C. R., Effect of a keystone predaceous ant,Solenopsis geminata, on arthropods in a tropical agroecosystem. Ecology63 (1982) 1979–1983.
Rojo de la Paz, A., Two new cases of myrmecophily in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): biology ofCigaritis zohra (Donzel, 1847) andCigaritis allardi (Oberthür, 1909) in Morocco. Nota lepid, Suppl.4 (1992) 14–17.
Samson, P. R., and O'Brien, C. F., Predation onOgyris genoveva (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) by meat ants. Aust. ent. Mag.8 (1981) 21.
Sanders, C. J., and Pang, A., Carpenter ants as predators of spruce budworm in the boreal forest of northwestern Ontario. Can. Ent.124 (1992) 1093–1100.
Scheper, M., van der Made, J., and Wynhoff, I.,Maculinea alcon: interactions between a myrmecophilous butterfly, its larval foodplant and its host ants. Proc. expl appl. Ent.5 (1995) in press.
Schroth, M., and Maschwitz, U., Zur Larvalbiologie und Wirtsfundung vonMaculinea teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), einem Parasiten vonMyrmica laevinodis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ent. Gener.9 (1984) 225–230.
Schurian, K. G., Fiedler, K., and Maschwitz, U., Parasitoids exploit secretions of myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly caterphillars (Lycaenidae). J. Lepid. Soc.47 (1993) 150–154.
Seufert, P., and Fiedler, K.,Drupadia ravindra andD. theda (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): contrasting systems of myrmecophily among two closely related butterfly species, in: Les insectes sociaux, p. 275. Eds. A. Lenoir, G. Arnold and M. Lepage, Université Paris Nord, Paris 1994.
Shields, O., World numbers of butterflies. J. Lepid. Soc.43 (1989) 178–183.
Smiley, J. T., Atsatt, P. R., and Pierce, N. E., Local distribution of the lycaenid butterfly,Jalmenus evagoras, in response to host ants and plants. Oecologia76 (1988) 416–422.
Tautz, J., and Fiedler, K., Mechanoreceptive properties of caterpillar hairs involved in mediation of butterfly-ant symbioses. Naturwissenschaften79 (1992) 561–563.
Thomas, J. A., The behaviour and habitat requirements ofMaculinea nausithous (the Dusky Large Blue Butterfly) andM. teleius (the Scarce Large Blue) in France. Biol. Conserv.28 (1984) 325–347.
Thomas, J. A., Elmes, G. W., and Wardlaw, J. C., Contest competition amongMaculinea rebeli butterfly larvae in ant nests. Ecol. Ent.18 (1993) 73–76.
Thomas, J. A., Elmes, G. W., Wardlaw, J. C., and Woyciechowski, M., Host specificity amongMaculinea butterflies inMyrmica ant nests. Oecologia79 (1989) 452–457.
Thomas, J. A., and Wardlaw, J. C., The effect of queen ants on the survival ofMaculinea arion larvae inMyrmica ant nests. Oecologia85 (1990) 87–91.
Thomas, J. A., and Wardlaw, J. C., The capacity of aMyrmica ant nest to support a predacious species ofMaculinea butterfly. Oecologia91 (1992) 101–109.
Vander Meer, R. K., and Wojcik, D. P., Chemical mimicry in the myrmecophilous beetleMyrmecaphodius excavaticollis. Science218 (1982) 806–808.
Vane-Wright, R. I., Ecological and behavioural orgins of diversity in butterflies, in: The diversity of insect faunas: pp. 56–70. Eds. L. A. Mound and N. Waloff. Academic Press. London 1978.
Viehmeyer, H., A myrmecophilous lycaenid chrysalis from the Philippines. Phillipp. J. Sci. D5 (1910) 73–77.
Wagner, D., Species-specific effects of tending ants on the development of lycaenid butterfly larvae. Oecologia96 (1993) 276–281.
Wagner, D., Species-sepcific effects of tending ants on the life history ofHemiargus isola, a North American lycaenid butterfly. Dissertation, Princeton University, 1994.
Warnecke, G., Übersicht über die bisher als myrmekophil bekannt gewordenen paläarktischen Schmetterlingsraupen der Familie Lycaenidae. Int. ent. Z. Guben26 (1932) 165–171, 215–219, 238–242, 285–291, 375–378, 431–433, 460–462, 479–480, 514–516;27 (1933) 44–46, 121–127, 178–180, 305–309.
Warrington, S., and Whittaker, J. B., An experimental field study of different levels of insect herbivory induced byFormica rufa predation on sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) I. Lepidoptera larvae. J. Anim. Ecol.22 (1985) 775–785.
Watkins, J. F., Gehlbach, F. R., and Baldridge, R. S., Ability of the blind snake,Leptotyphlops dulcis, to follow pheromone trails of army ants,Neivamyrmex nigrescens andN. opacithorax. Sthwest. Nat.12 (1967) 455–462.
Wilson, E. O., The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge/ Massachusetts 1971.
Woodman, R. L., and Price, P. W., Differential larval predation by ants can influence willow sawfly community structure. Ecology73 (1992) 1028–1037.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fiedler, K., Hölldobler, B. & Seufert, P. Butterflies and ants: The communicative domain. Experientia 52, 14–24 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01922410
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01922410