Skip to main content
Log in

Basic information for the use of primary trisomics in genetic and breeding research

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An attempt is made to arrange the basic information needed for using primary trisomics in localizing single and complementary dominant and recessive genes, accounting for random complete chromatid and random chromosome association, for heterozygosity of the trisomics and for female and male transmission rates. The expected ratios are given separately for the di-, tri- and tetrasomic group in each population. Also the ratios in the total populations have been calculated for different rates of female and male transmission of the extra chromosome. Both the backcross procedure and that of selfing trisomic F1 plants are considered. Finally the use of trisomics for studying quantitative characters is discussed in connection with the breeding and incompatibility system of the crops and in relation to the frequent morphological differences among trisomics as well as between trisomics and their disomic counterpart.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arora, O. P. &Khoshoo, T. N., 1969. Primary trisomics in moss verbena. Euphytica 18: 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, A. F., 1922. Variations inDatura due to changes in chromosome number. Am. Natur. 56: 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, A. F. &Belling, J., 1924. Chromosomal mutations in the Jimson Weed,Datura stramonium. J. Hered. 15: 194–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, A. F. &Avery, A. G., 1938. Fifteen-year breeding records of 2n + 1 types inDatura stramonium. Cooperation in Research, Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 501: 315–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Chi-Chang &Grant, W. F., 1968. Trisomic transmission inLotus pedunculatus. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 10: 648–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D., Hair, J. B. &Hurcombe, R., 1951. The history of the garden hyacinths. Heredity 5: 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einset, J., 1943. Chromosome length in relation to transmission frequency of maize trisomes. Genetics 28: 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodspeed, T. H. &Avery, P., 1939. Trisomic and other types inNicotiana sylvestris. J. Genet. 38: 381–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Chao-Hwa, 1968. Establishment of a complete set of trisomics in rice. Proceed. 12th Int. Congr. Genet. Tokyo 1: 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janick, J., Mahoney, D. L. &Pfahler, P. L., 1959. The trisomics ofSpinacia oleracea. J. Hered. 50: 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamanoi, M. &Jenkins, B. C., 1962. Trisomics in common rye,Secale cereale L. Seiken Zihô 13: 118–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasha, K. J. &McLennan, H. A., 1967. Trisomics in diploid alfalfa. I. Production, fertility and transmission. Chromosoma 21: 232–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesley, J. W., 1932. Trisomic types of the tomato and their relations to the genes. Genetics 17: 545–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K., 1957. The measurement of linkage in heredity. Methuen London, 3rd edition, 149 pp.

  • McClintock, B., 1929. A cytological and genetical study of triploid maize. Genetics 14: 180–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Person, C., 1956. Some aspects of monosomic wheat breeding. Can. J. Bot. 34: 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pochard, E., 1968. Isolation of ten primary trisomics in the progeny of a haploid pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Proceed. 12th Int. Congr. Genet. Tokyo 1: 266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, M. M., 1955. The cytogenetics of maize. In: Corn and corn improvement. Agronomy 5: 123–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C. M. &Barton, D. W., 1954. Cytological and genetical identification of the primary trisomics of the tomato. Genetics 39: 640–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudorf-Lauritzen, M., 1958. The trisomics ofAntirrhinum majus L. Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Genet. Montreal 2.: 243–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, D. R., Hunter, A. W. S. &Bradley, E. C., 1961. Triploid × diploid progenies and the primary trisomics ofAntirrhinum majus. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 3: 184–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schertz, K. F., 1966. Morphological and cytological characteristics of five trisomics ofSorghum vulgare Pers. Crop Science 6: 519–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe, H., 1934. Studien über heteroploide Formen vonAntirrhinum majus L. I. Mitteilung: zur Morphologie und Genetik der TrisomenAnaemica, Fusca, Purpurea, Rotunda. Planta 22: 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabushi, J., 1958. Trisomics of spinach. Seiken Zihô 9: 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchya, T., 1958. Studies on the trisomics in barley. I. Origin and the characteristics of primary simple trisomics inHordeum spontaneum C.Koch, Seiken Zihô 9: 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchya, T., 1960. Cytogenetic studies of trisomics in barley. Japan. J. Bot. 17: 177–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchya, T., 1967. The establishment of a trisomic series in a two-rowed cultivated variety of barley. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 9: 667–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsunewaki, K., 1964. Transmission of monosomes and trisomes in an emmer wheat,T. dicoccum var. Khapli. Wheat Information Service nos. 17/18: 34–35.

  • Vasek, F. C., 1956. Induced aneuploidy inClarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae). Am. J. Bot. 43: 366–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, G. E. &Rowe, P. R., 1968. Aneuploids from triploid-diploid crosses in the SeriesTuberosa of the genusSolanum. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 10: 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hermsen, J.G.T. Basic information for the use of primary trisomics in genetic and breeding research. Euphytica 19, 125–140 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01902936

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01902936

Keywords

Navigation