Skip to main content
Log in

Left ventricular regression equations from single plane cine and digital X-ray ventriculograms revisited

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the assessment of left ventricular volume from X-ray ventriculograms, widely known regression equations are used to correct for the irregular shape of the left ventricular lumen and the presence of the papillary muscles and trabeculations. These regression equations were derived in the late nineteen sixties and seventies. With all the changes in X-ray technology that have taken place over the past 20–30 years, the question was raised whether these regression equations were still valid. Therefore, 23 left ventricular casts of known volume were imaged in RAO20, RAO30 and RAO40 angiographic views and recorded on 35 mm cinefilm as well as in digital format. All the frames were traced manually by two observers and the volumes calculated by the Area Length and Simpson Rule approaches. The following conclusions could be drawn:

Dash

  • inter- and intra-observer variations were small (systematic differences < 1.5 ml; random differences < 2.9 ml) and statistically not significant;

  • the regression equations are virtually the same for the RAO20, RAO30 and RAO40 views under the different circumstances;

  • the Area Length method was associated with slightly smaller values for the standard-error-of-the-estimate (SEE) suggesting a slight preference for this approach versus the Simpson Rule;

  • significant differences were found between the cinefilm and digital regression equations; and

  • the following new regression equations are proposed, which indeed differ significantly from the earliest proposals and less from the monoplane formulas proposed by Kennedy & Lange in the 1970s:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheehan FH. Cardiac angiography. In: Marcus ML, Skorton DJ, Schelbert HR, Wolf GL (eds). Cardiac imaging. A comparison to Braunwald's Heart Disease. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1991: 109–148.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang SS, Bentivoglio LG, Maranhao V, Goldberg H (eds). From cardiac catheterization data to hemodynamic parameters. Philadelphia: F.A. David Company, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sandler H. Dimensional analysis of the heart — a review. Am J Med Sci 1970; 260: 56–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sandler H, Meier GD, Alderman EL. Ballistic motion of the heart. In: Sigwart U, Heintzen PH (eds). Ventricular wall motion. Stuttgart/New York: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1984: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sandler H, Dodge HT. The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J 1968; 75: 325–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lange P, Onnasch D, Farr FL, Straume B, Heintzen PH. Factors affecting the accuracy of angiocardiographic volume determination: left ventricle. In: Heintzen PH, Bürsch JH (eds). Roentgen-video-techniques for dynamic studies of structure and function of the heart and circulation. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Publishers, 1978: 184–90.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dodge HT, Sandler H, Ballew DW, Lord JD Jr. The use of biplane angiocardiography for the measurement of left ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J 1960; 60: 762–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sandler H, Hawley RR, Dodge HT, Baxley WA. Calculation of left ventricular volume from single-plane (A-P) angiocardiograms [abstract]. J Clin Invest 1965; 44: 1094–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kennedy JW, Trenholme SE, Kasser IS. Left ventricular volume and mass from single-plane cineangiocardiogram. A comparison of anteroposterior and right anterior oblique methods. Am Heart J 1970; 80: 343–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman CB, Baker O, Reynolds J, Bonte FJ. Use of biplane cinefluorography for measurement of ventricular volume. Circulation 1958; 18: 1105–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lange PE, Onnasch D, Farr FL, Malerczyk V, Heintzen PH. Analysis of left and right ventricular size and shape, as determined from human casts. Description of the method and its validation. Eur J Cardiol 1978; 8 (4/5): 431–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lange PE, Onnasch D, Farr FL, Heintzen PH. Angiocardiographic left ventricular volume determination. Accuracy as determined from human casts, and clinical application. Eur J Cardiol 1978; 8 (4/5): 449–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wynne J, Green LH, Mann T, Levin D, Grossman W. Estimation of left ventricular volumes in man from biplane cineangiograms filmed in oblique projections. Am J Cardiol 1978; 41: 726–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, Slager CJ. Quantitative coronary and left ventricular cineangiography. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1986: 224–30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koning G, Van den Brand M, Zorn I, Loois G, Reiber JHC. Usefulness of digital angiography in the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction. Cath Cardiovasc Diagn 1990; 21: 185–94.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van der Zwet PMJ, Meyer D, Reiber JHC. Automated and accurate assessment of the distribution, magnitude and direction of pincushion distortion in angiographic images. Invest Radiol 1995; 30: 204–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reiber, J.H.C., Viddeleer, A.R., Koning, G. et al. Left ventricular regression equations from single plane cine and digital X-ray ventriculograms revisited. Int J Cardiac Imag 12, 69–78 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01880736

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01880736

Key words

Navigation