Abstract
This paper deals with the distribution of scientific knowledge through formal education in South Africa, and links it with the representation of the population in science-related occupations. Using a “pipeline-mainline metaphor” it traces how science education at the tertiary and secondary levels sifts out some students, and prepares others to form the pool of potential science-related workers. The conclusion is that these occupations are overwhelmingly dominated by white South Africans. The paper further analyses science classroom factors that may help us to understand why this is so.
Zusammenfassung
Dieser Artikel behandelt die Verbreitung wissenschaftlicher Kenntnisse durch formale Erziehung in Südafrika und stellt eine Verbindung her zur Repräsentanz der Bevölkerung auf wissenschaftlich-orientierten Arbeitsplätzen. Mittels einer “Pipeline-Mainline Metaphor” (gehobener Bildungsweg, mittlerer Bildungsweg) weist er nach, wie eine wissenschaftlich orientierte Ausbildung auf Tertiar- und Sekundarebene einige Studenten aussiebt und andere darauf vorbereitet, das Sammelbecken für künftige wiesenschaftsbezogene Arbeitskräfte zu bilden. Das Ergebnis ist, daß diese Stellen fast ausschließlich mit weißen Südafrikanern besetzt sind. Der Artikel analysiert außerdem die Gestaltung der wissenschaftlich genutzten Unterrichtsräume was uns helfen könnte, die Gründe für diese Situation zu verstehen.
Résumé
Le présent article traite de la distribution du savoir scientifique par l'éducation formelle en Afrique du Sud et établit un lien entre celle-ci et la représentation de la population dans les professions relatives à la science. En s'appuyant sur une “métaphore de canalisation principale”, il retrace la manière dont l'enseignement des sciences écarte certains élèves aux niveaux secondaire et tertiaire pour en préparer d'autres à former le pool des scientifiques potentiels. Cet article aboutit à la conclusion que les métiers en question sont, en grande majorité, exercés par des Blancs. On analyse ensuite les facteurs des classes de science qui peuvent nous aider à comprendre pourquoi il en est ainsi.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anya, A. O. 1982.Science Development and the Future: The Nigerian Case. Enugu: University of Nigeria Press.
Asian Programme of Educational Innovation for Development (APEID). 1983.Science for All. Bangkok: Unesco.
Central Statistical Service, Republic of South Africa. 1986.Population Census, Report #02-85-07. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Clegg, A. and Khan, M. 1980.Science Education in Botswana. University College of Botswana.
Coleclough, C. and Hallak, J. 1975.Some Issues in Rural Education: Equity, Efficiency and Employment. Paris: Unesco.
Dreijmanis, J. 1988.The Role of the South African Government in Tertiary Education. Johannesburg: South African Intitute of Race Relations.
Gilbert, P. and Lovegrove, M. 1968.Science Education in Africa. Nairobi: Heineman.
Gabru, J. 15 March 1990. A Changing South Africa: Implications for United Teacher Action. Speech delivered to the Worcester United Education Front.
Hirschmann, K. and Rose, B., eds. 1972.Education for Development in Southern Africa. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
Human Sciences Research Council. 1981.Provision of Education in the Republic of South Africa, Main Report. Pretoria: HSRC.
Kallaway, P. 1984. “An Introduction to the Study of Education for Blacks in South Africa”. In: Kallaway, P., ed.,Apartheid and Education. Braamfontein, South Africa: Raven Press.
Knapp, M. et al. 1987.Opportunities for Strategic Investment in K-12 Science Education: Opportunities for the National Science Foundation. Palo Alto: SRI International.
Lawrence, M., ed. 1981.South African Education Policy: Analysis and Critique. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
MacDonald, M., Gilmour, J. and Moodie, P. 1985. Teacher Reaction to Innovation: A Case Study in a South African Setting.Journal of Education for Teaching 11(3): October.
Murphy, J. G. 1987.Teacher Opportunity Programmes: TOPS. Johannesburg: Fransman Scott.
Odhiambo, D., ed. 1975.Improvement of University Science Education in Africa. Nairobi: Unesco.
Pillay, P. N. 1984. The Development and Underdevelopment of Education in South Africa. Paper Presented at the Second Carnegie Inquiry into Poverty and Development in South Africa. Cape Town.
Raitt, L. 1985. Aspects of Secondary School Biology as Viewed by Some First-year Life-science Students.South African Journal of Education 5(4).
Rapport, 11 March. 1990.
Sunday Times, 14 January 1990.
Wilkenson, F., Reuter, M. and Kriel, C. 1987. An Analysis of the Problems Experienced by Teachers of Physical Science in Some Developing States within the South African Context.South African Journal of Education 7(1).
Unesco, 1967.Apartheid, Its Effects on Education, Science, Culture and Information. Paris: Unesco.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
September, R.T. How does it work, and who benefits? The distribution of scientific knowledge in South Africa. Int Rev Educ 36, 469–484 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874754
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874754