Skip to main content
Log in

Response ofNitella internodal cell to chemical stimulation

A model for olfactory receptor system

  • Published:
The Journal of Membrane Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Electrical response of excitable internodal cell ofNitella was studied by applying various kinds of odorants to the cell. Changes in membrane potential and resistance during responses induced by odorants were measured intracellularly under a variety of ionic environments in the media. Results were: 1) Some odorants (coumarin, isoamylacetate, methylacetate, 1-octanol, 1-butanol, 1-propanol) produced an all-or-nothing type action potential when the concentration of odorant exceeded a certain threshold. The action depended on the odorant concentration,C. Other odorants (heptanoic acid, β-ionon) induced gradual depolarization of the membrane potential without evoking an action potential. 2) Membrane resistanceR m changed in various ways during depolarization: some odorants led to a temporal or gradual decrease inR m, and others caused an increase inR m when the membrane potential was depolarized by the application of odorants. 3) Magnitude of response to odorantsOR was found to be represented by the following equation:

$$OR = (\alpha + \beta \sqrt 1 )\log (C/C_{th} ) for C \geqq C_{th} $$

where α and β are constants for a given odorant,I the ionic strength in the medium, andC th the threshold concentration of the odorant. 4) Plots of olfactory threshold of human and of internodal cell ofNitella gave a straight line having slope unity. 5) Local application of odorants on the internodal cell induced impulses which transmitted from the part treated by odorants to the other portion. Physico-chemical and physiological implications of the results obtained were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arvanitaki, A., Takeuchi, H., Chalazonitis, N. 1967. Specific unitary osmereceptor potentials and spiking patterns from giant nerve cells.In: Olfaction and Taste. T. Hayashi, editor. Vol. 2, p. 573. Pergamon Press. Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beidler, L.M. 1954. A theory of taste stimulation.J. Gen. Physiol. 38:133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beidler, L.M. 1965. Comparison of gustatory receptors, olfactory receptors, and free nerve endings.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 30:191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dowson, W.W. 1962. Chemical stimulation of the peripheral trigeminal nerve.Nature 196:341

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dethier, V.G. 1972. Sensitivity of contact chemoreceptors of blowfly to vapors.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA.69:2189

    Google Scholar 

  6. Inoue, I., Ishida, N., Kobatake, Y. 1973. Studies of excitable membrane formed on the surface of protoplasmic droplets isolated fromNitella. 4. Excitability of drop membrane in various compositions of the external salt solution.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 330:27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kamo, N., Miyake, M., Kurihara, K., Kobatake, Y. 1974. Physicochemical studies of taste reception. Parts 1 and 2.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 367:1, 11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kishimoto, U. 1966. Repetitive action potentials inNitella internodes.Plant Cell Physiol. 7:547

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koyama, N., Kurihara, K. 1972. Effect of odorants on lipid monolayer from bovine olfactory epithelium.Nature 236:402

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Osterhout, W.J.V., Hill, S.E. 1930. Negative variations inNitella produced by chloroform and by potassium chloride.J. Gen. Physiol. 13:459

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tazawa, M. 1964. Studies onNitella having artificial cell sap. 1. Replacement of the cell sap with artificial solutions.Plant Cell Physiol. 3:33

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tazawa, M. 1972. Membrane characteristics as revealed by water and ionic relations of Alogal cells.Protoplasma 75:427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tucker, D. 1971. Nonolfactory responses from the nasal cavity: Jacobson's organ and the trigeminal system.Handbook of Sensory Physiol. L.M. Beidler, editor. Vol. 4-1, pp. 151–181. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ueda, T., Muratsugu, M., Kurihara, K., Kobatake, Y. 1975. Olfactory response in excitable protoplasmic droplet and internodal cell ofNitella.Nature 253:629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ueda, T., Terayama, K., Kurihara, K., Kobatake, Y. 1975. Threshold phenomena in chemoreception and taxis by slime moldPhysarum polycephalum.J. Gen. Physiol. 65:223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ueda, T., Kurihara, K. & Kobatake, Y. Response ofNitella internodal cell to chemical stimulation. J. Membrain Biol. 25, 271–284 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868579

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868579

Keywords

Navigation