Summary
Membrane potential and resistance were recorded from parenchymal cells of oat (Avena) coleoptiles, using one and two intracellular electrodes. Membrane potential is largest (−100 mV) in impalements with low input resistance (2–4 MΩ), and is less negative (−50 mV) in penetrations with high input resistance (> 20 mΩ). The interpretation is that the electrode lodges in the vacuole which is positive to the cytoplasm (but still negative to the external solution), and that measurements of net membrane potential are compromised to varying degrees by leakage shunts introduced across the high resistance vacuolar membrane by the electrode. This conclusion is supported by several additional lines of evidence. (1) It is possible to convert large-R/small-V impalements into small-R/large-V penetrations by passing excess current through the electrode or by briefly ‘ringing’ the capacitance neutralization circuit in the amplifier. The cells usually recover their resistance in a few minutes, with a concomitant decrease in the negativity of the membrane potential. (2) Changes in external [K] affect the measuree potential by an amount that is independent of the input resistance of the impalement. This is consistent with an effect of [K] o on the potential of the plasma membrane and the occurrence of leakage shunts primarily at the tonoplast. (3) Quantitatively, the effects of a change in [K] o on resistance indicate that nearly 90 percent of the input resistance of unshunted cells resides in the tonoplast. (4) The effects of metabolic inhibitors (DNP, CN−) on potential are smaller in large-R than in small-R impalements. This observation suggests there are electrogenic pumps contributing to the membrane potential at both the plasmalemma and tonoplast. Finally, we conclude that with an electrode in the vacuole it is possible to record potentials that are dominated by the contribution of the plasma membrane, provided care is taken to select impalements combining both large, negative potential and low input resistance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, W.P., Hendrix, D.L., Higinbotham, N. 1974. The effect of cyanide and carbon monoxide on the electrical potential and resistances of cell membranes.Plant Physiol. 54:712–716
Anderson, W.P., Higinbotham, N. 1975. A cautionary note on plant root electrophysiology.J. Exp. Bot. 26:533–535
Cleland, R.E., Lomax, T. 1977. Hormonal control of H+-excretion from oat cells.In: Regulation of Cell Membrane Activities in Plants. E. Marre and O. Ciferri, editors, pp. 161–171. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam
Cleland, R.E., Prins, H.B.A., Harper, J.R., Higinbotham, N. 1977. Rapid hormone-induced hyperpolarization of the oat coleoptile transmembrane potential.Plant Physiol. 59:395–397
Coster, H.G.L., Zimmermann, U. 1975. The mechanism of electrical breakdown in the membranes ofValonia utricularis.J. Membrane Biol. 22:73–90
Drake, G. 1979. Electrical coupling, potentials, and resistances in oat coleoptiles: Effects of azide and cyanide.J. Exp. Bot. 30:719–725
Drake, G.A., Carr, D.J., Anderson, W.P. 1978. Plasmolysis, plasmodesmata, and the electrical coupling of oat coleoptile cells.J. Exp. Bot. 29:1205–1214
Dunlop, J. 1976. The elctrical potential difference across the tonoplast of root cells.J. Exp. Bot. 27:908–915
Etherton, B. 1970. Effect of indole-3-acetic acid on membrane potentials of oat coleoptile cells.Plant Physiol. 45:527–528
Etherton, B., Higinbotham, N. 1960. Transmembrane potential measurements of cells of higher plants as related to salt uptake.Science 131:409–410
Etherton, B., Keifer, D.W., Spanswick, R.M. 1977. Comparison of three methods for measuring electrical resistances of plant cell membranes.Plant Physiol. 60:684–688
Fischer, E., Lüttge, U., Higinbotham, N. 1976. Effect of cyanide on the plasmalemma potential ofMnium.Plant Physiol. 58:240–241
Ginsburg, H., Ginzburg, B.Z. 1974. Radial water and solute flows in roots ofZea mays. IV. Electrical potential profiles across the root.J. Exp. Bot. 25:28–35
Goldman, D.E. 1943. Potential, impedance, and rectification in membranes.J. Gen. Physiol. 27:37–60
Goldsmith, M.H.M., Cleland, R.E. 1978. The contribution of tonoplast and plasma membrane to the electrical properties of a higher-plant cell.Planta 143:261–265
Goldsmith, M.H.M., Fernández, H.R., Goldsmith, T.H. 1972. Electrical properties of parenchymal cell membranes in the oat coleoptile.Planta 102:302–323
Goldsmith, T.H., Goldsmith, M.H.M. 1978. The interpretation of intracellular measurements of membrane potential, resistance, and coupling in cells of higher plants.Planta 143:267–274
Greenham, C.G. 1966. The relative electrical resistances of the plasmalemma and tonoplast in higher plants.Planta 69:150–157
Higinbotham, N., Etherton, B., Foster, R.J. 1964. Effect of external K+, NH +4 , Na+, Ca++, Mg++, and H+ ions on the cell transmembrane electropotential ofAvena coleoptile.Plant Physiol. 39:196–203
Higinbotham, N., Graves, J.S., Davis, R.F. 1970. Evidence for an electrogenic ion transport pump in cells of higher plants.J. Membrane Biol. 3:210–222
Higinbotham, N., Hope, A.B., Findlay, G.P. 1964. Electrical resistance of cell membranes ofAvena coleoptiles.Science 143:1448–1449
Hodgkin, A.L., Katz, B. 1949. The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of the giant axon of the squid.J. Physiol. (London) 108:37–77
Hope, A.B., Walker, N.A. 1975. The Physiology of Giant Algal Cells, p. 91. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Keifer, D.W., Spanswick, R.M. 1978. Activity of the electrogenic pump inChara corallina as inferred from measurements of membrane potential, conductance, and potassium permeability.Plant Physiol. 62:653–661
Keifer, D.W., Spanswick, R.M. 1979. Correlation of adenosine triphosphate levels inChara corallina with the activity of the electrogenic pump.Plant Physiol. 64:165–168
Lüttge, U., Zirke, G. 1974. Attempts to measure plasmalemma and tonoplast electropotentials in small cells of the mossMnium using centrifugation techniques.J. Membrane Biol. 18:305–314
Marrè, E. 1979. Fusicoccin: A tool in plant physiology.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 30:273–288
Mertz, S.M., Higinbotham, N. 1976. Transmembrane electropotential in barley roots as related to cell type, cell location, and cutting and aging effects.Plant Physiol. 57:123–128
Poole, R.J. 1978. Energy coupling for membrane transport.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 29:437–460
Prins, H.B.A., Harper, J.R., Higinbotham, N. 1980. Membrane potentials ofVallisneria leaf cells and their relation to photosynthesis.Plant Physiol. 65:1–5
Rona, J.-P., Pitman, M.G., Lüttge, U., Ball, E. 1980. Electrochemical data on compartmentation into cell wall, cytoplasm, and vacuole of leaf cells in the CAM genusKalanchoë.J. Membrane Biol. 57:25–35
Spanswick, R.M. 1972. Electrical coupling between cells of higher plants: A direct demonstration of intercellular communication.Planta 102:215–227
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bates, G.W., Goldsmith, M.H.M. & Goldsmith, T.H. Separation of tonoplast and plasma membrane potential and resistance in cells of oat coleoptiles. J. Membrain Biol. 66, 15–23 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868478
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868478