Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structural trends in agriculture and preservation of family farms

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characteristics and role of the family farm have profoundly influenced the quality of human ecology. Considerable debate exists about the role of the family farm in the United States. This article attempts to clarify aspects of this debate by: (a) examining various definitions of the family farm and the conclusions that flow from these definitions, (b) presenting results of a structural analysis of American agriculture to better understand the origins of the debate and the relationship between people and agriculture, and (c) discussing the relevancy of some data and concepts used in evaluating the consequences of the structure of the agricultural sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Baker, G. L. 1980. Rural life. Page 16in Farm structure. US Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry, April 1980.

  • Ballis, G., and M. Sortor. 1972. Water, land and power.Congressional Record 118, no. 80, 92nd Congress, 2nd session, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batie, S. S., and R. G. Healy. 1983. The future of American agriculture.Scientific American 248:45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. 1978. The unsettling of America: culture and agriculture. Avon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnen, J. T. 1968. The distribution of benefits from selected U.S. farm programs. Pages 483–486in Rural poverty in the United States. Report by the President's National Advisory Commission on Rural Poverty. Washington, DC.

  • Breimyer. H. F. 1974. How federal income tax rules affect ownership and control of farming. Page 3in Who will control U.S. agriculture? North Central Regional Extension publication 37. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, D. E. 1980. Changes in the family farm concept. Pages 18–23in Farm structure. US Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry, April 1980.

  • Britton, D. K., and B. Hill. 1975. Size and efficiency in farming. Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. G., and H. Shue (eds.). 1977. Food policy. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, B. A. 1980. A profile of the commercial agriculture sector. Page 29in Farm structure. US Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry, April 1980.

  • Carter, H., W. Cochrane, L. Day, R. Powers, and L. Tweeten. 1981. Research and the family farm. Agricultural Experiment Station Committee on Organization and Policy, Cornell University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughenour, M., and J. Christenson. 1980. Is Life on the small farm beautiful? Paper presented at the 5th World Congress for Rural Sociology, Mexico City, August 1980.

  • Cox, G. W., and M. D. Atkins. 1977. Agricultural ecology. Pages 9–13in W. R. Burch, Jr. (ed.), Readings in ecology, energy, and human society: contemporary perspectives. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosson, P. R., and K. D. Frederick. 1977. The world food situation. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

  • Dorner, P. 1980. Agriculture within the U.S. economy: integration and interdependence. Pages 51–61in Farm structure. US Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry, April 1980.

  • Flora, J. L., I. Brown, and J. L. Conboy. 1977. Impact of type of agriculture on class structure, social well-being and inequalities. Research paper, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, B. C. 1977. The analysis of productive efficiency in agriculture marketing: models, methods, and progress. Pages 131–132in L. R. Martin (ed.), A survey of agricultural economics literature. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuguitt, G., and C. Beale. 1976. Agricultural economics report number 323. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, I. 1978. The communities of the San Joaquin Valley. Pages 1374–1396in U.S. Congress, Senate, Priorities in agricultural research of the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Appendix. Subcommittee on Administrative Practice and Procedure of the Committee on the Judiciary, 95th Congress, 2nd session, part 2.

  • Groth, E. 1977. Increasing the harvest. Pages 77–88in W. R. Burch, Jr. (ed.), Readings in ecology, energy, and human society: contemporary perspectives. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussow, J. 1981. Agriculture, food, and nutrition. Pages 123–137in Hugh Nash (ed.), Progress as if survival mattered. Friends of the Earth, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, W., and L. Tweeten. 1977.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59:1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, B., and J. Timmons. 1958. Research bulletin 460. Agricultural Experiment Station, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hightower, J. 1973. Hard tomatoes, hard times. Schenkman, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D. 1980. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Agricultural Economics Association, Pullman, Washington, August 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. 1980.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62:1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveen, E. P. 1979. Natural resource development and state policy: origins and significance of the crisis in reclamation.Antipode 11:62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, J. P., and E. J. Partenheimer. 1972. Evidence of economies and diseconomies of farm size. Pages 91–107in A. G. Ball and E. O. Heady (eds.), Size, structure, and future of farms. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marable, M. 1978. Black agriculture in the seventies.In These Times, 25–31 January, p. 6.

  • Margolis, P. 1977. Land reclamation laws: an overview.Rural America 2:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, P. 1978. Foreign land: investors underline problems of absentee ownership.Rural America 3:6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. V., and G. W. Dean. 1972. Industrialized farming. Pages 216–218in A. G. Ball and E. O. Heady (eds.), Size, structure, and future of farms. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolitch, R. 1969. Family-operated farms: their compatibility with technological advance.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 51:531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolitch, R. 1972. Family-size farms in U.S. agriculture. USDA Economic Research Service report 499. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, E. (ed.). 1980. Responsibilities for future generations. Prometheus, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, S. 1977. The family farm project. Pages 2–13in Small farm viability project, Technology Task Force report, California Department of Housing and Community Development.

  • Peterson, M. D. (ed.). 1975. The portable Thomas Jefferson. Viking, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., and M. Pimentel. 1979. Food, energy, and society. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rassmussen, W. D. 1982. Toward a third agricultural revolution.In Food policy and farm programs. Academy of Political Science, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup, P. M. 1969. Economies and diseconomies of large-scale agriculture.American Journal of Agricultural Economies 51:1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodefeld, R. D. 1978. Trends in U.S. farm organizational structure and type. Pages 374–375in Priorities in agricultural research of the US Department of Agriculture. Subcommittee on Administrative Practice and Procedure of the Committee on the Judiciary.

  • Schaefer, E. 1978. Changing character and structure of American agriculture: an overview. US Government Accounting Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F., and D. Clavelle. 1977. Issues on agricultural research.Rural America.

  • Soth, L. 1972. Tides of national development. Page 2902in U.S. Congress Senate, Farmworkers in rural America, 1971–1972. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Migratory Labor of the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, 92nd Congress, 2nd session, part 4B.

  • Spitze, R., D. Ray, A. Walter, and J. West. 1980. Public agricultural-food policies and small farms. Paper I of NRC Small Farms Project, National Rural Center, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, M. 1984. Weighing the social costs of innovation.Science 223:1368–1369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E. R. 1980. Technology and the structure of US agriculture. Page 71in Farm structure. US Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry, April 1980.

  • Tweeten, L. 1969. Theories explaining the persistence of low resource returns in a growing farm economy.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 51:809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweeten, L. 1983. The economics of small farms.Science 219:1037–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweeten, L., and G. Brinkman. 1976. Micropolitan development. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweeten, L., C. Cilley, and I. Popoola. 1980.Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 12:77.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Chamber of Commerce. 1974. The changing structure of U.S. agribusiness and its contribution to the national economy. Washington DC.

  • USBC. 1980. Census of agriculture. US Bureau of the Census, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • USBC. 1982. 1978 Census of agriculture, report (AC 78-SR-6). Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 1976. Returns to equity capital by economic class of farms. Economic Research Service report 347. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 1979a. Who owns the land? A preliminary report of a U.S. landownership survey. United States Department of Agriculture Economics, Statistics and Cooperative Service, September 1979, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 1979b. Farm income statistics. United States Department of Agriculture Economics, Statistics and Cooperative Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 1981. A time to choose: a summary report on the structure of agriculture. Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogeler, I. 1981. The myth of the family farm. Westview, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, F., B. Eddleman, and J. Purcell. 1980. IR-6 information report. Office of Technology Assessment, Work Group II, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Studies, Sweet Briar College, 24595, Sweet Briar, Virginia, USA

    John Lemons

Authors
  1. John Lemons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lemons, J. Structural trends in agriculture and preservation of family farms. Environmental Management 10, 75–88 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866419

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866419

Key words

Search

Navigation