Skip to main content
Log in

The lymphatic transport of lactate dehydrogenase. Effect of tissue anoxia and shock

  • Published:
Research in Experimental Medicine

Summary

In 11 dogs LDH activity and isoenzymes were determined in serum, cardiac, renal, hepatic, intestinal and leg lymph, in the myocardium, liver, kidney, intestinal wall, skeletal muscle and skin. Significantly higher activities than in serum were found in leg and cardiac lymph. Isoenzyme patterns in lymph differed significantly from the pattern in serum. The patterns in cardiac and intestinal lymph were not significantly different from that in the tissues of origin.

In another 11 dogs LDH activity and isoenzymes were studied in the leg and thoracic duct lymph and arterial and femoral vein serum before and after occlusion of blood flow in both hind limbs. Anoxia increased LDH activity in leg lymph and serum. In serum a significant arterio-venous difference was observed. Ischaemic shock did lead subsequently to an elevation of the enzyme level in thoracic duct lymph. The analysis of the isoenzyme patterns showed, that this enzyme is of visceral origin.

The results indicated that LDH is transported from the tissues by lymphatics as well as by blood capillaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyd, J. W.: J. Physiol. (Lond.)186, 67–68 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyer, S. H., Fainer, D. C., Watson-Williams, E. J.: Science141, 642–643 (1963).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cahn, R. D., Kaplan, N. O., Levine, L., Zwilling, E.: Science136, 962–969 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cain, J. C., Grindlay, J. H., Bollman, L. L., Flock, E. V., Mann, F. C.: Surg. Gynec. Obstet.85, 558–562 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Courtice, F. C.: Lymphology4, 9–17 (1971).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dawson, D. M., Alper, C. A., Seidman, J., Mendelsohn, J.: Ann. intern. Med.70, 799–805 (1969).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furlan, S., Morea, M., Taboga, E.: Boll. Soc. ital. Biol. sper.36, 941–942 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Furlan, S., Morea, M., Taboga, E.: Chir. Pat. sper.8, 1403–1415 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hopkins, E. W., Simone, A. F.: J. Amer. med. Ass.187, 122–125 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jepson, R. P., Simeone, F. A., Dobyns, B. M.: Amer. J. Physiol.175, 443–448 (1953).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis, G. P.: J. Physiol. (Lond.)191, 591–607 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis, G. P.: J. Physiol. (Lond.)205, 619–634 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loegering, D. J., Critz, J. B.: Amer. J. Physiol.220, 100–104 (1971).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Markert, C. L., Miller, F.: Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)45, 753–763 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mayerson, H. S.: The physiologic importance of lymph. In: Handbook of physiology, Sect. 2, Circulation, Vol. II, W. F. Hamilton (Ed.). Amer. Physiol. Soc., Washington 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Riley, V., Huerto, E., Bardell, D., Fitzmaurice, M. A., Loveless, J. D.: Fed. Proc.22, 242 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rusznyák, I., Földi, M., Szabó, G.: Lymphologie. Physiologie und Pathologie der Lymphgefäße und des Lymphkreislaufes. Stuttgart: Fischer 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt, E., Schmidt, W., Ottó, P.: Clin. chim. Acta15, 283–289 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Selmeci, L., Posch, E., Balogh, E.: Acta physiol. Acad. Sci. hung.38, 125–134 (1970).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Starkweather, W. H., Spencer, H. H., Schwartz, E. L., Schock, H. K.: J. Lab. clin. Med.67, 329–343 (1966).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Szabó, G., Magyar, Z.: Acta med. Acad. Sci. hung.8, 287–308 (1955).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Szabó, G., Magyar, Z.: Acta med. Acad. Sci. hung.25, 135–156 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Szabó, G., Magyar, Z., Molnár, G.: Proc. Int. Un. physiol. sci.9, 549 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thorling, E. B., Jensen, K.: Acta path. microbiol. scand.66, 426–436 (1966).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van der Helm, H. J.: Lancet1961 II, 108–109.

  26. Vesell, E. S., Bearn, A. G.: J. clin. Invest.40, 586–591 (1961).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vesell, E. S., Feldman, M. P., Frank, E. D.: Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.)101, 644–648 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vesell, E. S., Palmiero, C. F. P., Frank, E. D.: Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.)104, 403–405 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wieme, R. J.: Clin. chim. Acta4, 46–50 (1959).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson, A. C., Cahn, R. D., Kaplan, N. O.: Nature (Lond.)197, 331–334 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wright, E. J., Cawley, L. P., Eberhardt, L.: Amer. J. clin. Path.45, 737–745 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wroblevsky, F., LaDue, J. S.: Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.)90, 210–213 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wroblevsky, F., Ross, C., Gregory, K.: New Engl. J. Med.263, 531–535 (1960).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szabó, G., Vándor, E. & Anda, E. The lymphatic transport of lactate dehydrogenase. Effect of tissue anoxia and shock. Res. Exp. Med. 161, 39–48 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01851021

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01851021

Key words

Navigation