Skip to main content
Log in

A cognitive style perspective on ethical questions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has shown that cognitive style impacts several areas of human behavior of interest to marketers. This article reports the results of an exploratory study testing the proposition that cognitive style can influence one's perceptions of what is and is not a matter of ethics. The findings indicate that cognitive style can play a role in one's perceptions of ethics, and may help further our understanding of the factors that bear on ethical points of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beltramini, R. F., R. A. Peterson, and George Kozmetsky: 1984, ‘Concerns of College Students Regarding Business Ethics’,Journal of Business Ethics 3, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. and N. Levy: 1973, ‘Studies of Jungian Typology: I. Memory, Social Perception, and Social Action’,Journal of Personality 41, 559–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., E. N. Berkowitz, and W. Rudelius: 1980, ‘Ethical Problems of Field Sales Personnel’,MSU Business Topics 28, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J. and T. N. Ingram: 1984, ‘Correlates of Salespeople's Ethical Conflict: An Exploratory Investigation’,Journal of Business Ethics 3, 343–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. E.: 1985, ‘A Suggested Approach to Linking Decision Styles with Business Ethics’,Journal of Business Ethics 4, 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisbie, G. R: 1988, ‘Cognitive Styles: An Alternative to Keirsey's Temperaments’,Journal of Psychological Type 16, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E. W., Jr. and L. S. Broom: 1988, ‘Attitudes Toward Ethics: A View of the College Student’,Journal of Business Ethics 7, 617–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig, I.: 1984, ‘Basic Motivation and Decision Style in Organization Management’,Omega 12(1), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellriegel, D. and J. W. Slocum, Jr.: 1975, ‘Managerial Problem-solving Styles’,Business Horizons (December), 29–37.

  • Holt, D. A.: 1975, ‘Use of MBTI in Management Training’, paper presented at the First National Conference on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Gainesville, Florida, October.

  • Jung, C. G.: 1971,Psychological Types (H. G. Baynes, trans., rev. R. F. C. Hull.), (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, P. G. W. and G. S. Bronsema: 1981, ‘Cognitive Style Research: A Perspective for Integration’, inProceedings of the Second International Conference on Information Systems (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmann, R. H. and K. W. Thomas: 1975, ‘Interpersonal Conflict-Handling Behavior as Reflections of Jungian Personality Dimensions’,Psychological Reports 37, 971–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmann, R. H. and I. I. Mitroff: 1976, ‘Qualitative Versus Quantitative Analysis for Management Science: Different Forms for Different Psychological Types’,Interfaces 6(2) (February), 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L. S.: 1978, ‘Jungian Personality Variables of Psychotherapists of Five Different Theoretical Orientations’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University,Dissertation Abstracts International 39, 4042B-4043B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M. and A. J. Dubinsky: 1983, ‘Identifying and Addressing Retail Salespeople's Ethical Problems: A Method and Application’,Journal of Retaililng 59(1) (Spring), 46–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowen, W.: 1982,Dichotomies of the Mind: A Systems Science Model of the Mind and Personality (John Wiley and Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaulley, M. H. and F. L. Natter: 1974, ‘Psychological (Myers-Briggs) Type Differences in Education’, inThe Governor's Task Force on Disruptive Youth: Phase II Report (Office of the Governor, Tallahassee, FL).

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, R. P.: 1991, ‘The Impact of Jungian Cognitive Style on Marketing Interactions’, unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.

  • Mitroff, I. I. and R. H. Kilmann: 1975a, ‘On Evaluating Scientific Research: The Contribution of the Psychology of Science’,Technical Forecasting and Social Change 8, 163–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., V. P. Barabba, and R. H. Kilmann: 1977, ‘The Application of Behavioral and Philosophical Technologies to Strategic Planning: A Case Study of a Large Federal Agency’,Management Science,24(1) (September), 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I.: 1981, ‘Is a Periodic Table of the Elements for Organization Behavior Possible?’,Human Systems Management 2(3), 168–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. C.: 1983,Looking at Type (Center for Applications of Psychological Type, Gainesville, FL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. W. and T. F. Urban: 1978, ‘Myers-Briggs Personality Orientations and Information Processing Styles: Implications for Management Education and Development’, paper presented at the National Academy of Management, MED Session, San Francisco, August 10.

  • Thompson, L. L.: 1984, ‘An Investigation of the Relationship of the Personality Theory of C. G. Jung and Teachers' Self-Reported Perceptions and Decisions’, unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

  • White, K. B.: 1984, ‘A Preliminary Investigation of Information Systems Team Structures’,Information and Management 7(6) (December), 331–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., D. Armstrong, and C. Malcolm: 1985,The Negotiable Environment; People, White-Collar Work, and the Office (Facility Management Institute, Ann Arbor, MI).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Roger P. McIntyre is Assistant Professor of Marketing at East Carolina University. He has published in theJournal of Macromarketing, theJournal of Travel Research, theInternational Marketing Review, theJournal of Euromarketing, and numerous proceedings. His research interests center on the influence of cognitive style on marketing relationships.

Margaret M. Capen is an Associate Professor of Decision Sciences at East Carolina University, with a Ph.D. in Economics. She has published in such journals asApplied Economics, Journal of Industrial Relations, andThe Real Estate Appraiser. Her primary research interest is in applied linear models.

The authors thank Michael P. Mokwa for his guidance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McIntyre, R.P., Capen, M.M. A cognitive style perspective on ethical questions. J Bus Ethics 12, 629–634 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01845901

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01845901

Keywords

Navigation