Summary
The vast improvements in ultrasound technology have proved to be an important starting point for invasive investigative procedures in obstetrics. These methods not only allow a more precise diagnosis to be made but also offer considerable scope forin utero therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Callen, D. F., Korban, G., Dawson, G., Gugasyan, L., Krumins, E. J. M., Eichenbaum, S., Petrass, J., Purvis-Smith, S., Smith, A., Den Dulk, G. and Martin, N. Extra embryonic/fetal karyotypic discordance during CVS.Prenat. Diagn. 8 (1988) 453–460
Daffos, F., Capella-Pavlosky, M. and Forestier, F. Fetal blood sampling during pregnancy with the use of a needle guided by ultrasound: a study of 606 consecutive cases.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 153 (1986) 655–660
Ferguson-Smith, M. A. The reduction of anencephalic and spina bifida births by MSAFP screening.Br. Med. Bull. 39 (1983) 365–372
Gilmore, D. H. and McNay, M. B. Spontaneous fetal loss rate in early pregnancy.Lancet 1 (1985) 107
MRC. The assessment of the hazards of amniocentesis.Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 85 Suppl. 2 (1978)
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Report of the RCOG working party on routine ultrasound examination in pregnancy, 1984
Tabor, A., Madsen, M., Obel, E. B., Philip, J., Bang, J. and Norgaard-Pedersen, B. Randomized controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low risk women.Lancet 1 (1986) 1287–1293
Zador, I. E., Buttons, S. F., Tse, G. M., Brindley, B. A. and Sokol, R. J. Normograms for ultrasound visualization of fetal organs.J. Ultrasound Med. 7 (1988) 197–201
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whittle, M.J., Gilmore, D.H. & McNay, M.B. Obstetric aspects of prenatal diagnostic methods. J Inherit Metab Dis 12 (Suppl 1), 97–104 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01799289
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01799289