Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mixed inocula of mouse mammary tumour cell subpopulations result in changes of organ-specific metastasis

  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tumour and metastatic phenotypes, the pattern of mouse mammary tumour virus (MMTV) integration and expression, and the expression of a metastasis associated gene, nm23, were examined in three mammary tumour cell subpopulations, 66, 168 and 4526. Tumour growth, host survival, metastatic aggressiveness, and the distribution of different cell types in metastasis resulting from mixed cell inocula were also analysed. The results of these studies indicated that the cell lines were distinguishable from each other both phenotypically and genotypically. However, a rearrangement of the mammary tumour specific protooncogene,int-1, caused by MMTV was found to be a unique characteristic of the cell line 4526. Therefore,int-1 was used as a stable marker to examine the genotype of the metastatic colonies that developed in mice bearing tumours of mixed cell inocula. Highly metastatic 4526 cells influenced the metastatic range of poorly metastatic 66 cells. Line 66 cells that normally colonize only to lungs were also found to colonize liver when inoculated together with the liver-metastasizing 4526 cells. This acquired metastatic phenotype of 66 cells was transient. On the contrary, mixed cell inocula of 4526 and non-metastatic 168 cells did not produce any colony of 168 cells. The metastatic aggressiveness of 4526 cells was inhibited by both 66 and 168 cells. Furthermore, the metastatic behaviour of mixed inocula differed depending on the relative abundance of the component populations in the mixtures. These findings suggest that interaction between cells of different metastatic phenotypes may result in changes of their metastatic behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caignard, A., Martin, M. S., Michel, M. F., andMartin, F., 1985, Interaction between cellular subpopulations of a rat colonic carcinoma when inoculated to the syngeneic host.International Journal of Cancer,36, 273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cleveland, D. W., Lopata, M. A., MacDonald, R. J., Cowan, N. J., Rutter, W. J., andKirschner, M. W., 1980, Number and evolutionary conservation ofα- andβ-tubulin and cytoplasmicβ- andγ-actin genes using specific cloned cDNA probes.Cell,20, 95–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dear, T. N., andKefford, R. F., 1990, Molecular oncogenetics of metastasis.Molecular Aspects of Medicine,11, 243–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Giovanni, C.,Lollini, P.,Del Re, B.,Nicoletti, G.,Prodi, G.,Scotlandi, K., andNanni, P., 1989, Heterogeneity and clonal interactions in the TS/A murine mammary adenocarcinoma.Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, edited by G. Prodi and L. A. Liotta pp. 1–9.

  5. Dexter, D. L., Kowalski, H. M., Blazar, B. A., Fligiel, Z., Vogel, R., andHeppner, G. H., 1978, Heterogeneity of tumor cell from a single mouse mammary tumor.Cancer Research,38, 3174–3181.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fidler, I. J., 1978, Tumor heterogeneity and the biology of cancer invasion and metastasis.Cancer Research,38, 2651–2660.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallahan, D.,Kozak, C. andCallahan, R., 1987, Mammary tumorigenesis in feral mice: identification of a newint locus in mouse mammary tumor virus-induced mammary tumors.Journal of Virology, 66–74.

  8. Gunthert, U., Hofmann, M., Zoller, M., Wenzel, A., Ponta, H., andHerriich, P., 1991, A new variant of glycoprotein CD44 confers metastatic potential to rat carcinoma cells.Cell,65, 13–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heppner, G. H., Miller, B. E., andMiller, F. R., 1983, Tumor subpopulation interactions in neoplasms.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta,695, 215–226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hubbard, N. E., andErickson, K. L., 1987, Enhancement of metastasis from a transplantable tumor by dietary linoleic acid.Cancer Research,47, 6171–6175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Korczak, B., Robson, I. B., andLamarache, C., 1988, Genetic tagging of tumor cells with retrovirus vectors: Clonal analysis of tumor growth and metastasisin vivo.Molecular and Cellular Biology,8, 3143–3149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, W. T., Prakash, O., Klein, D., andSarkar, N. H., 1987, Structural alterations in the long terminal repeat of an acquired mouse mammary tumor virus provirus in a T-cell leukemia of DBA/2 mice.Virology,159, 39–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leith, J. T., Michelsion, S., Faulkner, L. E., andBliven, S. F., 1987, Growth properties of heterogeneous human colon tumors.Cancer Research,47, 1045–1051.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller, F. R., 1983, Tumor subpopulation interactions in metastasis.Invasion and Metastasis,3, 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, B. E., Miller, F. R., andHeppner, G. H., 1989, Therapeutic perturbation of the tumor ecosystem in reconstructed heterogenous mouse mammary tumors.Cancer Research,49, 3747–3753.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, F. R., Miller, B. E., andHeppner, G. H., 1983, Characterization of metastatic heterogeneity among subpopulations of a single mouse mammary tumor: heterogeneity in phenotypic stability.Invasion and Metastasis,3, 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, B. E., Miller, F. R., Wilburn, D., andHeppner, G. H., 1988, Dominance of a mammary tumor subpopulation line in mixed, heterogeneous tumors.Cancer Research,48, 5747–5753.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, B. E., Miller, F. R., Wilburn, D., andHeppner, G. H., 1987, Analysis of tumor cell composition of tumors composed of paired mixtures of mammary tumor lines.British Journal of Cancer,56, 561–569.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, B. E., Miller, F. R., Leith, J., andHeppner, G. H., 1980, Growth interactionin vivo between tumor subpopulations derived from a single mouse mammary tumor.Cancer Research,40, 3977–3981.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicolson, G. I., 1988, Organ specificity of tumor metastasis: role of adhesion, invasion and growth of malignant cells at specific secondary sites.Cancer and Metastasis Reviews,7, 143–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nusse, R., andVarmus, H., 1982, Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome.Cell,31, 99–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Poste, G., andNicholson, G. L., 1980, Arrest and metastasis of blood-borne tumor cells are modified by fusion of plasma membrane vescicles from highly metastatic cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA,77, 399–403.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poste, G., Doll, J., andFidler, I. J., 1981, Interactions among clonal subpopulations affect stability of the metastatic phenotype in polyclonal population of B16 melanoma cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA,78, 6226–6230.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Poste, G., Tzena, J., Greig, R., andZeidman, I., 1982, Evolution of tumor cell heterogeneity during progressive growth of individual lung metastases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA,79, 6574–6578.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roos, E., 1984, Cellular adhesion, invasion and metastasis.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta,738, 263–284.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., andManiatis, T., 1989,Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edition (New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Steeg, P. S., Bevilacqua, G., Kopper, L., Thorgeirsson, U. P., Talmadge, J. E., Liotta, L. A., andSobel, M. E., 1988, Evidence for a novel gene associated with low tumor metastatic potential.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,80, 200–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Talmadge, J. E., andZbar, B., 1987, Clonality of pulmonary metastasis from the bladder 6 subline of the B16 melanoma studied by Southern hybridization.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,178, 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tarin, D., andPrice, J. E., 1981, Influence of microenvironment and vascular anatomy on metastatic colonization potential of mammary tumors.Cancer Research,41, 3604–3609.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tofilon, P. J., andBuckley, N., 1984, Effect of cell-cell interactions on drug sensitivity and growth of drug-sensitive and -resistant tumor cell in spheroids.Science,226, 862–864.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Waghorne, C., Thomas, M., Lagarde, A., Kerbel, R. S., andBrietnam, M. S., 1988, Genetic evidence for progressive selection and overgrowth of primary tumors by metastatic cell subpopulations.Cancer Research,48, 6109–6114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Welch, D. R., Schissel, D. J., Howrey, R. P., andPaul, A., 1989, Tumor-elicited polymorphonuclear cells stimulate invasive and metastatic potentials of rat mammary adenocarcinoma cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA,86, 5859–5863.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hossain, A., Sarkar, A. & Sarkar, N.H. Mixed inocula of mouse mammary tumour cell subpopulations result in changes of organ-specific metastasis. Clin Exp Metast 9, 501–515 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01768579

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01768579

Keywords

Navigation