Summary
-
1.
A spontaneous haploid (2n=24) was found in an F3 family of the crossNicotiana Tabacum (Amersfoorter)×N.Tabacum atropurpurea.
-
2.
The plant was a typical dwarf and appeared to be completely sterile.
-
3.
At diakinesis and first metaphase 0,1 or 2 bivalents occurred, the average number per cell being 0,63 at diakinesis and 0,43 at metaphase.
-
4.
First metaphase shows the univalent chromosomes scattered all over the spindle.
-
5.
During first anaphase most chromosomes pass to the poles without division; in many cells, however, a few chromosomes between the polar groups divide equationally.
-
6.
Out of 436 interphase cells 6 (1,38%) showed a restitution nucleus. The very few normal pollen grains probably arise from such restitution nuclei.
-
7.
The literature on haploidNicotiana Tabacum is discussed with respect to homologous and non-homologous pairing, bivalent formation, and the occurrence of first metaphase plates consisting of bivalents or univalents.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Bleier, H., 1933. Die Meiosis von Haplodiplonten. Genetica 15, p. 129–176.
Chipman, R. H. andT. H. Goodspeed, 1927. Inheritance inNicotiana Tabacum, VIII. Cytological features ofPurpurea haploid. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 11, p. 141–158.
Clausen, R. E., 1932. Interspecific hybridization inNicotiana, XIII. Further data as to the origin and constitution ofNicotiana Tabacum. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 26, p. 123–136.
Clausen, R. E. andW. E. Lammerts, 1929. Interspecific hybridization inNicotiana, X. Haploid and diplid merogony. Amer. Nat. 63, p. 279–282.
Clausen, R. E. andMargaret C. Mann, 1924. Inheritance inNicotiana Tabacum, V. The occurrence of haploid plants in interspecific progenies. Proc. of the Nat. Ac. of Sc., 10, p. 121–124.
Ernst, H., 1940. Zytogenetische Untersuchungen und haploiden Pflanzen vonAntirrhinum majus L., I. Die Meiosis. Zeitschr. f. Bot. 35, p. 161–190.
Hachaturov, S. P., 1937. ANicotiana Tabacum haploid with bivalents at meiosis. Bull. of appl. Bot., Gen. and Plant br., Ser. II no. 7, p. 191–196. (Russ. with Engl. summary).
Ivanov, M. A., 1938. Experimental production of haploids inNicotiana rustica L. Genetica 20, p. 295–397.
Khristov, M., 1930. A haploid tobacco plant. Ann. Univ. Sofia, V. Facult. Agron. 8, p. 285–296 (Bulg. with engl. summary).
Kisch, R., 1941. Morphologie und Zytologie haploider Pflanzen vonEpilobium hirsutum. Zeitschr. f. Bot. 36, p. 513–537.
Kostoff, D., The problem of haploidy (Cytogenetic studies onNicotiana haploids and their bearings to some other cytogenetic problems). Bibliographia genetica XIII, 1941, p. 1–148
Lammerts, W. E., 1934. On the nature of chromosome associations inNicotiana Tabacum haploids. Cytologia 6, p. 38–50.
Levan, A., 1942. Studies on the meiotic mechanism of haploid rye. Hereditas 28, p. 177–211.
McClintock, B., 1933. The association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the mid-prophase of meiosis inZea mays. Ztschr. f. Zellf. u. mikr. Anat.,19, p. 191–237.
McCray, F. A., 1932. Another haploidNicotiana Tabacum plant. The Bot. Gaz. 93, p. 227–230.
Müntzing, A., 1936. The evolutionary significance of autopolyploidy. Hereditas 21, p. 263–378.
Povolochko, P. A., 1937. Experimental production of haploid plants in the genusNicotiana. Bull. of appl. Bot. Gen. and Plant br., Ser. II no 7, p. 175–190 (Russ. with Engl. summary).
Ruttle, Mabel Louise, 1928. Chromosome number and morphology inNicotiana, II. Diploidy and partial diploidy in root tips ofTabacum haploids. Univ. of Calif. Publ. Bot. 11, p. 213–231.
Ternovsky, M. F., 1936. Interspecific hybrdization inNicotiana. Occurrence of polyploid and haploid plants. Bull. of appl. Bot., Gen. and Plant br., Ser. II, No. 9, p. 125–130 (Russ. with Engl. summary).
Tometorp, G., 1939. Cytological studies on haploidHordeum distichum. Hereditas 25, p. 241–154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prakken, R. A spontaneous haploid of Nicotiana Tabacum. Genetica 23, 63–76 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01763803
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01763803