Skip to main content
Log in

Cultural influence on management aspects: The experience of the Chinese in Singapore

  • Articles
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A random sample of 306 Singaporean Chinese were interviewed using a structured interview schedule which contained twenty true-to-life situations. The situations were associated with four predetermined value areas: Relational, Temporal, Mannature and Activity. The general value structure of the Chinese in Singapore appears to be as follows: In the Relational area, the values are in the order of collaterality above individualism which in turn is above lineality. In the Temporal area, it is present and/or future above past. Mastery over nature, and harmony with nature subjugation to nature is shown to be the hierarchy in the area of Man-nature. In the Activity area, the value is for doing rather than being. The implications of these value orientations of the Chinese are discussed in relation to organizational behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, N. J., “Cross-Cultural Management: Issues to be Faced”,International Studies of Management and Organizations, Vol. xiii, No. 1–2, 1983, pp. 7–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Analects, vi. 6

  • Bhagat, R.S. and S. J. MaQuid, “Role of Subjective Culture in Organizations: A Review and Directions for Future Research”,Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67. No. 5, 1982, pp. 653–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, P. K.Modern Cultural Anthropology, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodde, D. “Harmony and Conflict in Chinese Philosophy”, in A. F. Wright (ed.)Studies in Chinese Thought, Chicago: American Philosophical Association, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhathal, R., “Science, Culture and Education”, in R. E. Vente, et al., (eds.)Cultural Heritage Versus Technological Development, Singapore: Maruzen Asia Pte. Ltd., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. S., “Individualism in the Japanese Management System” in S. M. Lee and G. Schwendiman,Japanese Management: Cultural and Environmental Considerations, New York: Praeger Publishers, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. D., “Cultural, Contingency and Capitalism in the Cross-national Study of Organizations”, in L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds.)Research in Organizational Behaviour. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Publishers, Vol. iii, 1981, pp. 303–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Barry, Wm. T.,Sources of Chinese Tradition New York: Columbia University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, G. W., “The Manager and His Values: An International Perspective”, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, G. W. and R. Koike, “Personal Value Systems of Japanese Managers”,Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 1, 1970, pp. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W. M., “Measuring the Impact of Culture on Organizations”,International Studies of Management and Organizations, Spring, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1975, pp. 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbank, J. K., E. O. Reischauer and M. Craig,East Asia: Tradition and Transformation, Boston: Houghton Miffli Co., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, H.,General and Industrial Management, London: Sir Issac Pitman and Sons, 1965, pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C.,The Interpretation of Culture, New York: Basic Books, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, P. D., “Value Theory: Towards Conceptual Clarification”,British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 23, 1974, pp. 172–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., “Cultural Dimensions in Management and Planning”,Asia Pacific Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1984, pp. 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.,Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values”, Beverly Hills: Sage Publishers, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, R., “Japanese-Style Management: Its Foundations and Prospects”, Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C., “Values and Value Orientation in the Theory of Action” in T. Parsons and E. Shis (eds.),Toward a General Theory of Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, F. and F. Strodtbeck,Variations in Value Orientations, Westpoint, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. and c. Kluckhohn,Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions, Cambridge, Mass: Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology, Harvard Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, R., “Participative Management as a Reflection of Culture Contingencies: A Need to Re-evaluate Our Ethic”, in S. M. Lee and G. Schwendiman,Japanese Management: Cultural and Environmental Considerations, New York: Praeger Publishers, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, R. H., “Social Time and Social Change”, Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Washington University, St. Luis, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, A., “The Cultural Diversity of Western Conceptions of Management”,International Studies of Management and Organizations, Vol. xiii, No. 1–2, 1983, pp. 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, F., “Parsons' Action Theory and the Common Culture Thesis”,Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 2, 1984, pp. 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M. J. Jr., “Contrasting Factors in the Modernization of China and Japan, in S. Kuznets, et al. (eds.),Economic Growth: Brazil, India and Japan, Durham: Duke University Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, R. T. and P. R. Harris,Managing Cultural Synergy, Vol. 2, Houston: Gulf Publishing Co., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, H., “Time in Indian and Chinese Thought”,History of Scientific Thought, Vol. 2, Cambridge: England, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negandhi, A. R. and S. B. Prasad,Comparative Management, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W.,Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.,The Social System. Glencoe: Free Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, K. L.,Language in Relation to a United Theory of the Structure of Human Behaviour, The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston, D. L. and J. Singlemann, “Socioeconomic Status, Value Orientations and Fertility Behaviour in India”.Demography, Vol. 12, 1975, pp. 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S. G., “Cognition as an Aspect of Culture and its Relation to Management Process: An Exploratory View of the Chinese Case”,Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1980, pp. 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryterband, E. C. and G. V. Barrett, “Managers, Values and Their Relationship to the Management of Tasks: A Cross-cultural Comparison”, in B. M. Bass, R. Cooper and J. A. Hass (eds.)Managing for Accomplishment, Boston: Heath, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H.,Organizational Culture and Leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— “Coming to new awareness of Organizational Culture”,Sloan Management Review, Vol. 25, 1984, pp. 371–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. and V. Vassiliou, “Interpersonal Relations and Employee Selection in Two Cultures”,Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 56, 1982, pp. 140–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, W., “A Cross-National Test of England's Model of Managers's Value Systems and Their Relationship to Behaviour”, in G. W. England, A R. Negandhi and B. Wilpert (eds.),Organizational Functioning in a Cross-cultural Perspective, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, W. and G. England, “Managerial Values as a Reflection of Culture and the Process of Industralization”,Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 20, 1977, pp. 439–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimalasiri, J. S.,Value Orientations of the Chinese in Singapore: Structure, Content and Implications, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, England, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— “Correlates of Work Values of Singapore Employees”,Singapore Management Review, Vol. 6, 1984, pp. 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. Y., “Education of Confusian Values”, in R. E. Vente, et al.,Cultural Heritage versus Technological Development, Singapore: Maruzen Asia Pte Ltd., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported here is a part of a broader study into the core value system of the Chinese in Singapore, and the presentation should be seen in that context. The main research was supported by a grant from the National University of Singapore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wimalasiri, J. Cultural influence on management aspects: The experience of the Chinese in Singapore. Asia Pacific J Manage 5, 180–196 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733153

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733153

Keywords

Navigation