Skip to main content
Log in

Differential meiotic behaviour of diploid and tetraploid cells in a partially asynaptic mutant

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

A partially asynaptic individual of the grasshopperEuchorthippus pulvinatus (2n ♂ = 16 + X) was analysed at meiosis, using a Giemsa C-banding technique. Long chromosomes formed univalents less frequently than did medium and short ones. Homologues which succeeded in forming bivalents showed reduced chiasma frequency, the long chromosomes being affected by most. Changes in chiasma distribution were also observed. The presence of univalents at metaphase I seems to affect the function of the spindle, since most cells at the second division were unreduced. Cytokinesis was also subsequently suppressed in a great number of these products of restitution, resulting in the formation of diploid and tetraploid spermatids. Fifteen tetraploid metaphase I cells were also found in which pairing level and chiasma frequency were almost twice the average value in normal diploid individuals. The nature of this mutant is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arana P, Santos JL, Giráldez R (1980) Chiasma interference and centromere co-orientation in a spontaneous translocation heterozygote of Euchorthippus pulvinatus gallicus (Acrididae; Orthoptera). Chromosoma 78:327–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker BS, Carpenter AT, Esposito MS, Sandler L (1976) The genetic control of meiosis. Annu Rev Genet 10:53–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez M, Puertas MJ (1981) Chiasma distribution in asynaptic Locusta migratoria. Chromosoma 84:431–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll CJ, Darvey NL, Barber HN (1967) Effect of colchicine on meiosis of hexaploid wheat. Nature 216:687–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Giráldez R, Santos JL (1981) Cytological evidence for preferences of identical over homologous but not-identical meiotic pairing. Chromosoma 82:447–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubovskaya IN (1979) Genetic control of meiosis. Int Rev Cytol 58:247–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk W, Kaul MLH (1980a) Asynapsis and desynapsis in flowering plants. I. Asynapsis. Nucleus 23:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk W, Kaul MLH (1980b) Asynapsis and desynapsis in flowering plants. II. Desynapsis. Nucleus 23:97–120

    Google Scholar 

  • John B, Henderson SA (1962) Asynapsis and polyploidy in Schistocerca paranensis. Chromosoma 13:114–147

    Google Scholar 

  • John B, Lewis KR (1965) Protoplasmatologia. I. The meiotic system. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, p 335

    Google Scholar 

  • John B, Naylor B (1961) Anomalous chromosome behaviour in the germ line of Schistocerca gregaria. Heredity 16:187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones GH, Croft JA (1986) Surface spreading of synaptonemal complexes in locusts. II. Zygotene pairing behaviour. Chromosoma 93:489–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Koduru PKR, Rao MK (1981) Cytogenetics of synaptic mutants in higher plants. Theor Appl Genet 59:197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller PC (1938) Asynapsis in Pisum sativum. J Genet 36:275–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HW, Pao WK, Li Ch (1945) Desynapsis in common wheat. Am J Bot 32:92–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Omara MK, Hayward MD (1978) Asynapsis in Lolium perenne. Chromosoma 67:87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Pi PH, Chao CY (1974) Microsporogenesis in Paspalum longifolium and P. commersonii on two different ploidy levels. Cytologia 39:453–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken R (1943) Studies of asynapsis in rye. Hereditas 29:475–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees H (1957) Distribution of chiasmata in an “asynaptic” locust. Nature 180:559

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson MM (1935) Meiosis in Crepis. II. Failure of pairing in Crepis capillaris (L.) WALLR. J Genet 31:119–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Rufas JS, Iturra P, de Souza W, Esponda P (1982) Simple silver staining procedure for the localization of nucleolus and nucleolar organizer under light and electron microscopy. Arch Biol 93:267–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos JL, Giráldez R (1978) The effect of C-heterochromatin in chiasma terminalization in Chorthippus biguttulus L. (Acrididae, Orthoptera). Chromosoma 70:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos JL, Giráldez R (1982) C-heterochromatin polymorphism and variation in chiasma localization in Euchorthippus pulvinatus gallicus (Acrididae, Orthoptera). Chromosoma 85:507–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjödin J (1970) Induced asynaptic mutants in Vicia faba L. Hereditas 66:215–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Soost RK (1951) Comparative cytology and genetics of asynaptic mutants in Lycopersicum esculentum MILL. Genetics 36:412–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas H, Rajhathy T (1966) A gene for desynapsis and aneuploidy in tetraploid Avena. Can J Genet Cytol 8:506–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Zickler D, de Lares L, Moreau PJF, Leblon G (1985) Defective pairing and synaptonemal complex formation in a Sordaria mutant (spo44) with a translocated segment of the nucleolar organizer. Chromosoma 92:37–47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santos, J.L. Differential meiotic behaviour of diploid and tetraploid cells in a partially asynaptic mutant. Chromosoma 99, 231–236 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731134

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731134

Keywords

Navigation