Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The reasoning of a great methodologist: Mark Blaug on the nature of Paretian welfare economics

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In various publications Blaug has upheld the view that Paretian welfare economics is normative, sharply criticising the opposite ‘Archibald-Hennipman argument.’ He has failed to refute this and to defend his position, with the allegation that positive welfare economics cannot exist, convincingly. His reasoning is marred by misunderstandings, inconsistencies, circularities and traces of essentialism. The normative conception is an ambiguous hybrid that cannot fulfil the pretension to offer definite prescriptions. It is advisable to regard allocation theory as belonging to positive economics; its normative application must drop its claim to represent welfare economics as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archibald, G.C. (1959), ‘Welfare Economics, Ethics, and Essentialism,’Economica, 39, pp. 316–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslanbeigui, N. (1990), ‘On the Demise of Pigovian Economics,’Southern Economic Journal, 56, pp. 616–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates (dy1975),The Theory of Environmental Policy, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

  • Collison Black, R.D. (1986), ‘Dentists and Preachers,’ in: R.D.C. Black (ed.),Ideas in Economics, Basingstoke-London, pp. 1–15.

  • Blaug, M. (1962),Economic Theory in Retrospect, Homewood (Ill.).

  • — (1968),Economic Theory in Retrospect, 2nd ed., Homewood (Ill.).

  • — (1978),Economics Theory in Retrospect, 3rd ed., Cambridge.

  • — (1985a),Economic Theory in Retrospect, 4th ed., Cambridge.

  • — (1980a),The Methodology of Economics or How Economists Explain, Cambridge.

  • — (1980b),A Methodological Appraisal of Marxian Economics, Amsterdam.

  • — (1985b), ‘Marginal Cost Pricing: No Empty Box,’ in: D. Greenway and G.K. Shaw (eds.),Public Choice, Public Finance and Public Policy. Essays in Honour of Alan Peacock, Oxford, pp. 15–30. Reprinted in Blaug (1990), pp. 170–185.

  • — (1990),Economic Theories: True or False? Essays in the History and Methodology of Economics, Aldershot.

  • — (1991), ‘Afterword,’ in: N. de Marchi and M. Blaug (eds.),Appraising Economic Theories. Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs, Aldershot, pp. 499–512.

  • Boadway, R.W. and N. Bruce (1984),Welfare Economics, Oxford.

  • Bohnen, A. (1964),Die utilitaristische Ethik als Grundlage der modernen Wohlfahrtsökonomik, Göttingen.

  • Buchanan, A. (1985),Ethics, Efficiency, and the Market, Oxford.

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1968),The Demand and Supply of Public Goods, Chicago.

  • Chipman, J.S. (1987), ‘Compensation Principle,’ in: Eatwellet al., vol. 1, pp. 524–531.

  • Cirillo, R. (1979),The Economics of Vilfredo Pareto, London.

  • Coleman, J.L. (1985), ‘Market Contractarianism and the Unanimity Rule,’ in: E.F. Paulet al. (eds.),Ethics and Economics, Oxford, pp. 69–114.

  • Cooter, R.D. (1987), ‘Coase Theorem,’ in: Eatwellet al., vol. 1, pp. 457–459.

  • Dehem, R. (1969),L'utopie de l'économiste ou la rationalité économique collective, Paris.

  • De Marchi, N. (1987), ‘Paradoxes and Anomalies,’ in: Eatwellet al., vol. 3, pp. 796–799.

  • Dick, E. (1973),Untersuchungen einiger Grundprobleme der Wohlfahrtsökonomik, Tübingen.

  • Doel, H. van den (1979),Democracy and Welfare Economics, Cambridge.

  • Doel, J. van den and B.C.J. van Velthoven (1990),Democratie en welvaartstheorie, 3rd ed., Alphen aan den Rijn.

  • Eatwell, J., M. Murray and P. Newman (eds.) (1987),The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, vol. 1–4, London-Basingstoke.

  • Feldman, A. (1980),Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory, Boston.

  • Feldman, A.M. (dy1987), ‘Welfare Economics,’ in: Eatwellet al., vol. 4, pp. 889–895.

  • Ferguson, C.E. (1972),Microeconomic Theory, 3rd ed., Homewood, Ill.

  • Gijsel, P. de (1989), ‘On the Role of General Equilibrium in Walras's Theory of a Just Society,’ in: D.A. Walker (ed.),Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, vol. 1, Aldershot, pp. 133–144.

  • Graaff, J. de V. (1989), ‘Kaldor on Welfare,’ in: T. Lawson, J.G. Palma and J. Sender (eds.)Kaldor's Political Economy, London, pp. 19–23.

  • Groenewegen, P. (1987), “‘Political Economy” and “Economics”,’ in: Eatwell,et al., vol. 3, pp. 904–907.

  • Hamlin, A.P. (1986),Ethics, Economics and the State, Brighton.

  • Hammond, P. (1985), ‘Welfare Economics,’ in: G.R. Feiwel (ed.),Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare, Basingstoke, pp. 405–434.

  • Hands, D. W. (1984), ‘Blaug's Economic Methodology,’Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 14, pp. 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, F. (1973),Toegepaste welvaartseconomie, 2nd ed., Leiden.

  • Head, J.G. (1974),Public Goods and Public Welfare, Durham, N.C.

  • Hébert, R.F. and R.B. Ekelund (1984), ‘Welfare Economics,’ in: J. Creedy and D.P. O'Brien (eds.),Economic Analysis in Historical Perspective, London, pp. 46–83.

  • Heertje, A. (1989), ‘Introduction,’ in: J.E. Stiglitzet al.,The Economic Role of the State, Oxford, pp. 1–8.

  • Hennipman, P. (1976), ‘Pareto Optimality: Value Judgment or Analytical Tool?,’ in: J.S. Cramer, A. Heertje and P. Venekamp (eds.),Relevance and Precision. Essays in Honour of Pieter de Wolff, Alphen aan den Rijn-Amsterdam, pp. 39–69.

  • — (1980), ‘Some Notes on Pareto Optimality and Wicksellian Unanimity,’ in: E. Ming (ed.), Wandlungen in Wirtschaft and Gesellschaft. Festschrift für Walter Adolf Jöhr, Tübingen, pp. 400–410.

  • —— (1982), ‘Welfare Economics in an Impasse? Some Observations on Mishan's Vision,’De Economist, 130, pp. 457–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1984a), ‘Normative or Positive: Mishan's Half-way House,’De Economist, 132, pp. 86–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1984b), ‘The Nature of Welfare Economics: A Final Note,’De Economist, 132, p.238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. (1956),A Revision of Demand Theory, Oxford.

  • — (1981),Wealth and Welfare, Oxford.

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1976),Price Theory and Applications, London.

  • Holcombe, R.G. (1990), ‘Social Welfare,’ in: J. Creedy (ed.),Foundations of Economic Thought, Oxford, pp. 159—185.

  • Hutchison, T.W. (1964),‘Positive’ Economics and Policy Objectives, London.

  • Kaldor, N. (1960),Essays on Value and Distribution, London.

  • Klant, J.J. (1988), ‘The Natural Order,’ in: N. de Marchi (ed.),The Popperian Legacy in Economics, Cambridge, pp. 87–117.

  • Körner, S. (1955),Kant, Harmondsworth.

  • Laffont, J.J. (1987), ‘Externalities,’ in: Eatwellet al., vol. 2, pp. 263–265.

  • Leibenstein, H. (1976),Beyond Economic Man, Cambridge (Mass.).

  • — (1987), ‘X-efficiency Theory,’ in: Eatwellet al., vol. 4, pp. 934–935.

  • Little, I.M.D. (1957),A Critique of Welfare Economics, 2nd ed., Oxford.

  • Lockwood, B. (1987), ‘Pareto Efficiency,’ in: Eatwellet al., vol. 3, pp. 811–813.

  • Machlup, F. (1978),Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences, New York.

  • Marshall, A. (1920),Principles of Economics, 8th ed., London.

  • Meade, J.E. (1937),An Introduction to Economic Analysis and Policy, 2nd ed., London.

  • Melck, A.P. (1987), ‘Theoretical Welfare Economics after Thirty Years,’South African Journal of Economics, 55, pp. 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingat, A., P. Salmon and A. Wolfelsperger (1985),Méthodologie économique, Paris.

  • Mishan, E. J. (1981 a),Economic Efficiency and Social Welfare, London.

  • — (1981b),Introduction to Normative Economics, New York-Oxford.

  • —— (1984a), ‘The Implications of Alternative Foundations for Welfare Economics,’De Economist, 132, pp. 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1984b), ‘Welfare Criteria: Concluding Comments,’De Economist, 132, pp. 234–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, S.K. (1969),A Reappraisal of Welfare Economics, London.

  • — (1973),A Perspective of Welfare Economics, London-Basingstoke.

  • Ng, Y.-K. (1972), ‘Value Judgments and Economists’ Role in Policy Recommendation,’Economic Journal, 82, pp. 1014–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1979),Welfare Economics, London-Basingstoke.

  • — (1983),Welfare Economics, 2nd ed., London-Basingstoke.

  • O'Connell, J.F. (1982),Welfare Economic Theory, Boston.

  • Pareto, V. (1927),Manuel d'économie politique, 2nd ed., Paris.

  • Penz, G.P. (1986),Consumer Sovereignty and Human Interest, Cambridge.

  • Pigou, A.C. (1932),The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed., London.

  • Price, C.M. (1977),Welfare Economics in Theory and Practice, London-Basingstoke.

  • Reiter, S. (1987), ‘Efficient Allocation,’ in: Eatwellet al., vol. 2, pp. 106–120.

  • Robbins, L. (1935),An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd ed., London.

  • — (1976),Political Economy: Past and Present, London.

  • — (1981), ‘Economics and Political Economy,’Papers and Proceedings of the American Economic Association, pp. 1–10.

  • Robertson, D.H. (1952),Utility and All That, London.

  • Rothenberg, J. (1967), ‘Consumer Sovereignty,’ in: D.L. Sills (ed.),International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 326–335.

  • Rowley, C.K. and A.T. Peacock (1975),Welfare Economics. A Liberal Restatement, London.

  • Sen, A. (1982),Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Oxford.

  • — (1987),On Ethics and Economics. Oxford.

  • Shearmur, J. (1990), ‘From Hayek to Menger: Biology, Subjectivism, and Welfare,’ in: R.J. Caldwell (ed.),Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics, Durham, N.C.-London, pp. 189–212.

  • Silberberg, E. and D.A. Walker (1989), ‘A Modern Analysis of Giffen's Paradox,’International Economic Review, 25, pp. 687–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohmen, E. (1976),Allokationstheorie and Wirtschaftspolitik, Tübingen.

  • Stewart, I.M.T. (1979),Reasoning and Method in Economics, London.

  • Stigler, G. J. (1988),Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist, New York.

  • Sugden, R. (1981),The Political Economy of Public Choice. An Introduction to Welfare Economics, Oxford.

  • Tarascio, V.J. (1968),Pareto's Methodological Approach to Economics, Chapel Hill, N.C.

  • —— (1974), ‘Pareto on Political Economy,’History of Political Economy, 6, pp. 361–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1987), ‘Marginal and Average Cost Pricing,’ in: Eatwellet al., vol. 3, pp. 311–318.

  • Walker, D.A. (1984), ‘Is Walras's Theory of General Equilibrium a Normative Scheme?,’History of Political Economy, 16, pp. 445–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1987), ‘Giffen's Paradox,’ in: Eatwellet al., vol. 2, pp. 523–524.

  • Wilber, C.K. and R. Hoksbergen (1984), ‘Current Thinking on the Role of Value Judgments in Economic Science,’ in: W.J. Samuels (ed.),Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, vol. 2, pp. 179–194.

  • Wolfson, D.J. (1990), ‘Towards a Theory of Subsidisation,’De Economist, 138, pp. 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. (1987), ‘Positive Economics,’ in: Eatwellet al., vol. 3, pp. 920–921.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is deeply indebted to Elisabeth Eybers for linguistic and to Kitti Manning for technical assistance. He is grateful to ABN-AMRO for making publication of this article financially possible.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hennipman, P. The reasoning of a great methodologist: Mark Blaug on the nature of Paretian welfare economics. De Economist 140, 413–445 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01725238

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01725238

Keywords

Navigation