Skip to main content
Log in

Lárbitraire de chine

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phonologists often look to “external” data to determine which analysis of some set of data is psychologically real for the users of the language. In this vein, Chao (1931, 1934) argued that secret language data support the analysis of Beijing palatals as allophones of the velars. However, several of the secret language rules described by Chao are not allophonic rules of Beijing phonology, and some do not even belong to the phonology at all. In particular, the process which relates palatals to velars is argued not to be allophonic and to be probably quite independent of the phonology (as suggested by data from a second secret language). Depending on how we analyze the latter, the palatals turn out to be phonemically distinct from velars, or else their phonemic status remains indeterminate. Thus, “external” data cannot always be used to settle the cases of indeterminacy (or, non-uniqueness).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Stephen R. (1973) “u-Umlaut and Skaldic Verse”, in R. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.),A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagemihl, Bruce (1989) “The Crossing Constraint and ‘Backwards Languages’”,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7, 481–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, Zhimin (1990) “Fanqie Languages and Reduplication,”Linguistic Inquiry 21, 317–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan (1917) Vvedenie v jazykovedenie. Petrograd, 5th ed; parts reprinted in his (1990)Dziela wybrane, vol. IV, PAN, Warsaw, pp. 482–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Yuen-ren (1931) “Fanqieyu Bazhong [Eight Varieties ofFanqie Languages]’,Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology (Academia Sinica) 2, 312–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Yuen-ren (1934) “The Non-uniqueness of Phonemic Solutions of Phonemic Systems”,Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology (Academia Sinica) 4, 363–397; reprinted (1957) in M. Joos (ed.),Readings in Linguistics, The Development of Descriptive Linguistics in America since 1925, American Council of Learned Societies, New York, pp. 38-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Yuen-ren (1968)A Grammar of Spoken Chinese, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Matthew Y. (1984) “Abstract Symmetry in Chinese,”Linguistic Inquiry 15, 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle (1968)Sound Pattern of English, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, Victoria (1971) “The Non-anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances,”Language 47, 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris (1959)The Sound Pattern of Russian, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockett, Charles F. (1947) “Peiping Phonology,”Journal of the American Oriental Society 6, 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenstowicz, Michael and Charles Kisseberth (1979)Topics in Phonological Theory, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manaster Ramer, Alexis (1981)How Abstruse is Phonology?, PhD dissertation, The University of Chicago.

  • Manaster Ramer, Alexis (1985) “The Ułaszyn-Halle Paradox and Modern Phonology,” in W. U. Dressler and L. Tonelli (eds.),Natural Phonology from Eisenstadt, Papers from the Fifth International Phonology Meeting, CLESP, Padua, pp. 89–100.

  • Manaster Ramer, Alexis (1987) “Chunk Youg in Memoriam”,Theoretical Linguistics 14, 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Samuel E. (1958) “Problems of Hierarchy and Indeterminacy in Mandarin Phonology,”Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology (Academia Sinica) 29, 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1988)Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. II (Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications), Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohala, John J. (1984)Consumer's Guide to Evidence in Phonology, Berkeley Cognitive Science Report 17.

  • Ohala, John J. (1986)The Validation of Phonological Theories, special issue ofPhonology Yearbook 3.

  • Ohala, John J. and J. J. Jaeger (1986)Experimental Phonology, Academic Press, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, Edward (1933) “La réalité psychologique des phonèmes,”Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique 30, 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherzer, Joel (1970) “Talking Backwards in Cuna: The Sociological Reality of Phonological Descriptions,”Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 26, 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shezer, Joel (1982) “Play Languages: With a Note on Ritual Languages,” in L. K. Obler and L. Menn (eds.)Exceptional Language and Linguistics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 175–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ułaszyn, Henryk (1931) “Laut, Phonema und Morphophonema,”Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 4, 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, Moira (1982) “Reduplication and C-V skeleta in Chinese Secret Languages,”Linguistic Inquiry 13, 637–661.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank several anonymous reviewers for their comments as well as San Duanmu for his comments and assistance with translating some passages from Chao (1931).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramer, A.M. Lárbitraire de chine. J East Asian Linguis 4, 59–69 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01720746

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01720746

Navigation