Computerized monitoring of the EMG and EEG during anesthesia

An evaluation of the anesthesia and brain activity monitor (ABM®)
  • Harvey L. EdmondsJr.
  • Markku Paloheimo
Article

Summary

An intraoperative evaluation was made of the electroencephalographic (EEG) and electromyographic (EMG) functions of the Anesthesia and Brain activity Monitor (ABM®). This device derives both these measures from a single electrode pair that is typically placed on the mid-forehead and mastoid process. The evaluation consisted of 1) quantifying the zero-crossing frequency (ZXF) of the EEG and mean integrated voltage of both measures (MIVEEG and MIVEMG) that occurred during induction and emergence from general anesthesia in 17 patients and 2) case reports sampled from an additional 41 patients.

Alone or combined, variations in these parameters did not consistently accompany changes in the depth or adequacy of anesthesia as determined by standard clinical signs (e.g. heart rate, blood pressure, movement). Interpatient variability in the EEG measures during recovery from anesthesia was so large that neither the absolute value of ZXF nor that of MIVEEG could discriminate between moderate (i.e., maintenance) and light (i.e., emergence) anesthesia. Although MIVEMG uniformly decreased in anesthetized, unparalyzed patients (compared to the pre-operative awake state), noticeable increases during recovery often did not occur until limb movement was observed. Additionally, the common use of neuromuscular blockers made interpretation of low MIVEMG values quite difficult during anesthesia maintenance.

However, selected individual case reports illustrated the potential benefit of routine intraoperative, microprocessor-based EEG/EMG monitoring. The single channel EEG/EMG display of the ABM seems sufficient to warn the anesthesiologist of pathologic decreases in cerebral electrical activity. Marked depression of cerebral function is associated with accidental anesthetic overdose, hypoxia or global ischemia. Additionally, the device should be useful for monitoring burst-suppression or isoelectric EEG patterns intentionally produced during barbiturate or isoflurane coma for cerebral protection.

Keywords

amplitude analysis electroencephalography (EEG) electromyography (EMG) frequency analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dubois M, Savege TM, O'Carroll TM, Frank M: General anaesthesia and changes on the cerebral function monitor. Anaesthesia 33: 157–164, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edmonds HL, Jr, Wauquier A: Modern approaches for monitoring of brain function during neurosurgery. In: QJ Gomez, LM Egay, MF de la Cruz-Odi (eds) Anaesthesia — safety for all. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1984, pp 219–224.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edmonds HL, Jr, Yoon YK, Sjogren SI, Maguire HT, McGraw CP: Computerized EMG and EEG correlates of consciousness. In: O Prakash (ed) Computing in anesthesia and intensive care. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, 1983, pp 258–267.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fink BR: Electromyography in general anesthesia. Br J Anaesth 33: 555–559, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harmel MH, Klein FF, Davis DA: The EEMG — a practical index of cortical activity and muscular relaxation. Acta Anaesth Scand 70 (Suppl): 97–102, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klein FF: A waveform analyzer applied to the human EEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 23: 246–252, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klein FF, Davis DA: The use of time domain analyzed EEG in conjunction with cardiovascular parameters for monitoring anesthetic levels. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 28: 36–40, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levy W, Shapiro HM, Maruchak G, Meathe E: Automated EEG processing for intraoperative monitoring. Anesthesiology 53: 223–236, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marshall BE, Wollman H: General anesthetics. In: AG Gilman, LS Goodman and A Gilman (eds) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 6th edn. Macmillan, N.Y., 1980, pp 276–299.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pronk RAF: EEG processing in cardiac surgery. Inst Med Physics TNO, Utrecht, 1982, pp 4–5 to 4–22.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rampil IJ, Holzer JA, Quest DO, Rosenbaum SH, Correll JW: Prognostic value of computerized EEG analysis during carotid endarterectomy. Anesth Analg 62: 186–192, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sotaniemi KA, Sulg IA, Hokkanen TE: Quantitative EEG as a measure of cerebral dysfunction before and after open-heart surgery. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 50: 81–95, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sulg IA, Sotaniemi KA, Tolonen U, Hokkanen E: Dependence between cerebral metabolism and blood flow as reflected in the quantitative EEG. Adv Biol Psychiat 6: 102–108, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sundt TM, Sharbrough FW, Plepgras DG, Kearns TP, Messick JM, Jr., O'Fallon WM: Correlation of cerebral blood flow and electroencephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomy. Mayo Clin Proc 56: 533–543, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tolonen U, Sulg IA: Comparison of quantitative EEG parameters from four different analysis techniques in evaluation of relationships between EEG and CBF in brain infarction. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 51: 177–185, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harvey L. EdmondsJr.
    • 1
  • Markku Paloheimo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiaSurgical HospitalHelsinki 13Finland

Personalised recommendations