Summary
Most combinatorial libraries are ‘sparse’ in that only a tiny fraction of the relevant class of compounds is represented. This sparseness can be compensated in some measure by alternating rounds of selection with rounds of mutagenesis. Thus, clones are selected from the initial library by some criterion of ‘fitness’, such as affinity for a particular receptor. The selected clones are then mutagenized to generate a mutant library, which serves as input to the next round of selection, and so on. If the first round of selection is too stringent, rejecting all but the very fittest clone in the initial library (the ‘initial champion’), we might miss ‘dark horses’; clones in the initial library that are inferior to the initial champion, yet can be mutated to even higher fitness than can that champion. A more thoughtful strategy is to alternate nonstringent selection with simultaneous mutagenesis of many selected clones en masse.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Szostak, J.W.,In vitro genetics, Trends Biochem., 17 (1992) 89–93.
Kenan, D.J., Tsai, D.E. and Keene, J.D.,Exploring molecular diversity with combinatorial shape libraries, Trends Biochem., 19 (1994) 57–64.
Yu, J. and Smith, G.P.,Affinity maturation of phage-displayed peptide ligands, Methods Enzymol., 267 (1996) 3–27.
Smith, G.P., Schultz, D.A. and Ladbury, J.E.,A ribonuclease S-peptide antagonist discovered with a bacteriophage display library, Gene, 128 (1993) 37–42.
Schultz, D.A., Ladbury, J.E., Smith, G.P. and Fox, R.O., unpublished data, 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, G.P., Yu, J. In search of dark horses: Affinity maturation of phage-displayed ligands. Mol Divers 2, 2–4 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718693
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718693