Skip to main content
Log in

Antwoord Aan Prof. Dr. A. Heertje En Drs. D. Furth

Reply to A. Heertje and D. Furth

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The endogeneous duopoly solution as put forward in the author's paper “A Dynamic Duopoly Model” (De Economist, 1970, pp. 458–490) is not refuted by the objections raised in the preceding article. The contention that the analysis is based on a reaction pattern in the sense of Launhardt neglects the interdepedence between induced and autonomous price changes as formulated in the price reaction functions. The equilibrium prices in a Launhardt model differ from the endogeneously determined equilibrium prices derived in the author's paper. Since the price reaction coefficients are reconsidered in each period by the duopolists, the dynamic process generates these coefficients endogeneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Der Weel, H. Antwoord Aan Prof. Dr. A. Heertje En Drs. D. Furth. De Economist 119, 485–497 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01716772

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01716772

Keywords

Navigation