Skip to main content

Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 281 Accesses

Abstract

Traditional general equilibrium theory, as exemplified in Walras (1874–7) and Hicks (1939), was concerned only with perfect competition, though it was preceded by Cournot’s theory of oligopoly (1838), where perfect competition is only a limiting case of oligopoly. Walras (1874–7, p. 431) admitted that perfect competition is not the only possible system of economic organization and that we must consider the effects of other systems, such as those of monopolies, in order to make a choice between perfect competition and the other systems, as well as to satisfy our scientific curiosity. His theory of monopoly, however, remains a partial equilibrium analysis and no general equilibrium model is developed for an economy which contains monopolies. Hicks was more explicit in excluding monopolies from general equilibrium theory. He insisted that ‘a universal adoption of the assumption of monopoly, must have very destructive consequences for economic theory’ (1939, p. 83). The effect of an increase in demand on price is indeterminate, if the expansion of the firm is stopped not by rising costs, as in the case of competition, but by the limitation of the market, as in the case of monopoly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Arrow, K.J., and F. Hahn. 1971. General competitive analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. 1967. Trade liberalization among industrial countries. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, E.H. 1933. The theory of monopolistic competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cournot, A.A. 1838. Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses. Trans. N.T. Bacon. New York: Macmillan, 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A., and J. Stiglitz. 1977. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review 67(3): 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzroy, F. 1974. Monopolistic equilibrium, non-convexity and inverse demand. Journal of Economic Theory 7(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz, J.J., and J. Vial. 1972. Oligopoly ’à la Cournot’ in a general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Economic Theory 4(3): 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F.H. 1978. On non-Walrasian equilibria. Review of Economic Studies 45(1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O.D. 1982. A model of imperfect competition with Keynesian features. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97(1): 109–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O.D. 1984. Imperfect competition in general equilibrium: An overview of recent work. In Frontiers of economics, ed. K.J. Arrow and S. Honkapohja. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. 1939. Value and capital, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. 1983. Classics and moderns. Collected essays on economic theory, vol. III. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1966. Causes of the slow rate of economic growth in the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. 1979. Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics 9(4): 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuenne, R.E. 1967. Quality space, interproduct competition, and general equilibrium theory. In Monopolistic competition theory: Studies in impact, ed. R.E. Kuenne. New York: J. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.J., and G. Laroque. 1976. Existence d’un équilibre général de concurrence imparfaite: une introduction. Econometrica 44(2): 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, O. 1944. Price flexibility and employment, Cowles Commission Monograph, vol. 8. Bloomington: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, T., and R. Selten. 1974. General equilibrium with price-making firms, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 91. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negishi, T. 1961. Monopolistic competition and general equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies 28: 196–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negishi, T. 1979. Microeconomic foundations of Keynesian macroeconomics. Amsterdam: North- Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikaido, H. 1975. Monopolistic competition and effective demand. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J., and H. Sonnenschein. 1977. On the foundations of the theory of monopolistic competition. Econometrica 45(19): 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. 1933. The economics of imperfect competition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre, J. 1977. General monopolistic equilibrium under nonconvexities. International Economic Review 18(2): 425–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre, J. 1978. Increasing returns in general non-competitive analysis. Econometrica 46(2): 397–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1776. In An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. R.H. Campbell, A.S. Skinner, and W.B. Todd. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, P. 1926. The laws of returns under competitive conditions. Economic Journal 36: 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triffin, R. 1940. Monopolistic competition and general equilibrium theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walras, L. 1874–7. Éléments d’économie politique pure ou théorie de la richesse sociale. Definitive edn, Lausanne: Corbaz. Trans. W. Jaffé. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Negishi, T. (2018). Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1095

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics