Skip to main content
Log in

Employment, schooling and productivity growth

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper presents an empirical analysis of labour demand and labour productivity growth in The Netherlands. Assuming an aggregate production function with as factors capital and 3 types of labour, distinguished by educational attainment, cost minimization leads to a set of 3 labour demand relations to be estimated on time series data. Using the estimates and the implied elasticities, aggregate labour productivity growth is decomposed into factor substitution, autonomous factors, labour time shortening, economies of scale, utilization rates and the increased educational level of the working population. The contributions of substitution, utilization rates and education appear to be substantial, notably in the seventies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a i :

Efficiency index of skill leveli

C :

production

h i :

working-time index for skill leveli

g i :

steady-state growth rate of skill leveli

K :

capital stock

L i :

employment volume of skill leveli

L * i :

desired level of labour skill leveli

p :

output price

p * :

desired output price

s * i :

long-run static labour shares in the production value

p k :

rental price of capital

P :

index of total factor productivity

P l :

index of labour productivity

u i :

utilization rate of skill leveli

u k :

utilization rate of capital

w i :

wage rate for skill leveli

y :

production volume

y yij :

Hicks partial elasticities of complementarity

θ i :

steady-state cost share of skill leveli

θ k Bk:

steady-state cost share of capital

λ f lf:

highest level price index in cost function nesting

λ g 4:

intermediate level price index in cost function nesting

λ h 4:

lowest level price index in cost function nesting

ν i :

steady-state relative wage share of skill leveli

σ ij :

Allen partial elasticities of substitution

d i l:

adjustment speed of skill leveli

d p :

price adjustment speed

M :

mark-up on marginal costs

ν :

scale elasticity of production

α i :

distribution parameter in cost function,i = 3, g

β i :

distribution parameter in cost function,i = k, h

γ i :

distribution parameter in cost function,i =1, 2

η i :

autonomous labour productivity growth for skill leveli

ζ i :

cost share of skill level in base year

ζ f :

production cost index in base year

ξ i :

hours elasticity in labour efficiency index

σ :

group elasticity of substitution betweenL 3 and (K, (L 1,L 2))

σ g Og:

group elasticity of substitution betweenK and (L 1,L 2)

σ h 6h:

group elasticity of substitution betweenL 1 andL 2

References

  • Berndt, E. and M. Fuss (1986), ‘Productivity Measurements with Adjustments for Variation in Capacity Utilization and other forms of Temporary Equilibrium,’Journal of Econometrics, 33, pp. 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broer, D.P. (1987),Neoclassical Theory and Empirical Models of Aggregate Firm Behaviour, Dordrecht.

  • Darby, M.R. (1984), ‘The U.S. Productivity Slowdown: A Case of Statistical Myopia,’American Economic Review, 74, pp. 301–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E.F. (1967),Why Growth Rates Differ, The Brookings Institution, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E.F. (1979),Accounting for Slower Economic Growth, The Brookings Institution, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E.F. (1984), ‘Accounting for Slower Economic Growth: An Update,’ in: J.W. Kendrick (ed.),International Comparisons of Productivity and Causes of the Slowdown, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Denison, E.F. (1985),Trends in American Economic Growth, 1929–1982, The Brookings Institution, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.B. (1986), ‘Demand for Education,’ in: O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.),Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume I, Amsterdam.

  • Gelauff, G.M.M., A.H.M. de Jong and A.R.M. Wennekers (1984), ‘Een putty-clay model met vijf productiefactoren en deels endogene technische ontwikkeling,’Occasional Paper no. 32, Central Planning Bureau, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollop, F.M. and D.W. Jorgenson (1980), ‘U.S. Productivity Growth by Industry, 1947–73,’ in: J.W. Kendrick and B.N. Vaccara (eds.),New Developments in Productivity Measurement, Chicago.

  • Grant, J.H. (1979),Labor Substitution in U.S. Manufacturing, Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.

  • Griliches, Z. (1969), ‘Capital Skill Complementarity,’Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, pp. 465–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenveld, K. and S.K. Kuipers (1978), ‘The Influence of Substitution and technical Progress on Income Differences between Graduate and Other Labour,’ in: W. Krelle and A.F. Shorrocks (eds.),Personal Income Distribution, Amsterdam.

  • Hamermesh, D.S. and J.H. Grant (1979), ‘Econometric Studies of Labor-Labor Substitution and their Implications for Policy,’Journal of Human Resources, 14, pp. 518–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D.F. (1979), ‘Simple Analytics of Single Dynamic Econometric Equations,’ unpublished paper.

  • Hickman, B.G. and R.M. Coen (1976),An Annual Growth Model of the U.S. Economy, Amsterdam.

  • Jorgenson, D.W. and Z. Griliches (1967), ‘The Explanation of Productivity Change,’Review of Economic Studies, 34, pp. 249–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, C.G., W.E. Griffiths, R.C. Hill and T.C. Lee (1980),The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, New York.

  • Keller, W.J. (1976), ‘A Nested CES-type Utility Function and its Demand and Price-Index Functions,’European Economic Review, 7, pp. 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, J.W. (1981), ‘International Comparisons of Recent Productivity Trends,’ in: W. Fellner (ed.),Essays in Contemporary Problems: Demand, Productivity and Population, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, J.W. and E.G. Grossmann (1980),Productivity in the United States, Baltimore.

  • McMahon, W.W. (1984), ‘The Relation of Education and R&D to Productivity Growth,’Economics of Education Review, 3, pp. 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S.J. (1986), ‘Dynamic Models of Labour Demand,’ in: O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.),Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume I, Amsterdam.

  • Norsworthy, J.R. (1984), ‘Growth Accounting and Productivity Measurement,’Review of Income and Wealth, 30, pp. 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G. (1984), ‘The Contribution of Education to Economic Growth: International Comparisons,’ in: J. W. Kendrick (ed.),International Comparisons of Productivity and Causes of the Slowdown, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Ritzen, J.M.M. (ed.) (1985), ‘Menselijk kapitaal en conjunctuur’ (Human Capital and Business Cycles), Erasmus University Rotterdam.

  • Ritzen, J.M.M. (1987), ‘Human Capital and Economic Cycles,’Economics of Education Review, 6, pp. 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, K. (1967), ‘A Two-Level Constant-Elasticity-of-Substitution Production Function,’Review of Economic Studies, 34, pp. 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, R. and T. Koizumi (1973), ‘On the Elasticities of Substitution and Complementarity,’Oxford Economic Papers, 25, pp. 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1975),Income Distribution, Analysis and Policies, Amsterdam.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to thank B. Downey, G.M.M. Gelauff, A. Nieuwenhuis, J.M.M. Ritzen, J.C. Siebrand and an unknown referee for helpful comments on earlier drafts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broer, D.P., Jansen, W.J. Employment, schooling and productivity growth. De Economist 137, 425–453 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705974

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705974

Keywords

Navigation