Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of solid and liquid culture media with the polymerase chain reaction for detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples

  • Articles
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of different methods — two commercial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kits (a protocol of nested PCR and a protocol of amplification of the IS6110 insertion element), the radiometric Bactec system, the Septi-Chek AFB culture system, and culture in Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) solid medium — for the detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis. One hundred clinical samples from 51 patients with culture-positive tuberculosis (81 specimens) and 19 controls (19 specimens) were used. Eighty-nine percent of the samples were smear negative. In the 81 specimens obtained from patients with tuberculosis, the frequency of positivity was 66.6% for nested PCR, 63% for culture in liquid media, 38.3% for the IS6110 assay, and 28.4% for culture on LJ medium. In 18 samples obtained by invasive procedures in patients with tuberculosis, mycobacterial DNA was detected by nested PCR in 83.3% (including all samples positive by culture on liquid media), by culture in liquid media in 77.7%, by culture on LJ medium in 27.7%, and by the IS6110 assay in 11.1%. No false-positive results were obtained from the negative control specimens with any of the techniques tested. The sensitivity of the reamplification protocol appears to be superior to that of the IS6110 assay and similar to that of the Bactec system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pfaller MA: Application of new technology to the detection, identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of mycobacteria. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1994, 101: 329–337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drake TA, Hindler JA, Berlin OGW, Bruckner DA: Rapid identification ofMycobacterium avium complex in culture using DNA probes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1987, 25: 1442–1445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goto M, Oka S, Okuzumi K, Kimura S, Shimada K: Evaluation of acridinium-ester-labeled DNA probes for identification ofMycobacterium tuberculosis andMycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare complex in culture. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 2473–2476.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Wit D, Steyn L, Shoemaker S, Sogin M: Direct detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by DNA amplification. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 2437–2441.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenach KD, Crawford JT, Bates JH: Repetitive DNA sequences as probes forMycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988, 26: 2240–2245.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenach KD, Cave MD, Bates JH, Crawford JT: Polymerase chain reaction amplification of a repetitive DNA sequence specific forMycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1990, 161: 977–981.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hance AJ, Grandchamp B, Levy-Frebault V, Lecossier D, Rauzier D, Bocart D, Gicquel B: Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of mycobacterial DNA. Molecular Microbiology 1989, 3: 843–849.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hermans PWM, Schuitema ARJ, Van Soolingen D, Verstynen CPHJ, Bik EM, Thole JER, Kolk AHJ, van Embden JDA: Specific detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1204–1213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pao CC, Yen TSB, You J-B, Maa J-S, Fiss EH, Chang C-H: Detection and identification ofMycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA amplification. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1877–1880.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel RJ, Fries JWU, Piessens WF, Wirth DF: Sequence analysis and amplification by polymerase chain reaction of a cloned DNA fragment for identification ofMycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 513–518.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sjöbring U, Mecklenburg M, Andersen ÅB, Miörner H: Polymerase chain reaction for detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 2200–2204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thierry D, Brisson-Noël A, Vincent-Lévy-Frébault V, Nguyen S, Guesdon J-L, Gicquel B: Characterization of aMycobacterium tuberculosis insertion sequence, IS6110, and its application in diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 2668–2673.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pierre C, Lecossier D, Boussougant Y, Bocart D, Joly V, Yeni P, Hance AJ: Use of a reamplification protocol improves sensitivity of detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples by amplification of DNA. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 712–717.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nolte FS, Metchock B, McGowan JE Jr, Edwards A, Okwumabua O, Thurmond C, Mitchell PS, Plikaytis B, Shinnick T: Direct detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum by polymerase chain reaction and DNA hybridization. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 1777–1782.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson SM, McNerney R, Nye PM, Godfrey-Faussett PD, Stoker NG, Voller A: Progress toward a simplified polymerase chain reaction and its application to diagnosis of tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 776–782.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abe C, Hosojima S, Fukasawa Y, Kazumi Y, Takahashi M, Hirano K, Mori T: Comparison of MB-Check, BACTEC, and egg-based media for recovery of mycobacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 878–881.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Isenberg HD, D'Amato RF, Heifets L, Murray PR, Scardamaglia M, Jacobs MC, Alperstein P, Niles A: Collaborative feasibility study of a biphasic system (Roche Septi-Chek AFB) for rapid detection and isolation of mycobacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 1719–1722.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morgan MA, Horstmeier CD, De Young Roberts GD: Comparison of a radiometric method (BACTEC) and conventional culture media for recovery of mycobacteria from smear-negative specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 18: 384–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Telenti M, de Quirós JFB, Alvarez M, Santos Rionda MJ, Mendoza MC: The diagnostic usefulness of a DNA probe forMycobacterium tuberculosis complex (Gen-Probe) in the BACTEC culture versus other diagnostic methods. Infection 1994, 22: 18–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tenover FC, Crawford JT, Huebner RE, Geiter LJ, Horsburgh CR, Good RC: The resurgence of tuberculosis: is your laboratory ready? Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 767–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Woods GL, Witebsky FG: Current status of mycobacterial testing in clinical laboratories. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 1993, 117: 876–884.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Whittier PS, Westfall K, Setterquist S, Hopfer RL: Evaluation of the Septi-Chek AFB system in the recovery of mycobacteria. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1992, 11: 915–918.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Piersimoni C, Morbiducci V, De Sio G, Scalise G: Comparative evaluation of the MB-Check system for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1992, 11: 1174–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roberts GD: Mycobacteria and nocardia. In: Washington JA (ed): Laboratory procedures in clinical microbiology. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985, p. 379–318.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts GD, Koneman EW, Kim YK:Mycobacterium. In: Balows A, Hausler WJ Jr, Herrman KL, Isenberg HD, Shadomy HJ (ed): Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, 1991, p. 304–339.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Young KY: The detection of mycobacterial DNA using PCR. In: Ehrlich GD, Greenberg SJ (ed): PCR-based diagnostics in infectious disease. Blackwell Scientific, London, 1994, p. 537–558.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brisson-Noël A, Aznar C, Chureau C, Nguyen S, Pierre C, Bartoli M, Bonete R, Pialoux G, Gicquel B, Garrigue G: Diagnosis of tuberculosis by DNA amplification in clinical practice evaluation. Lancet 1991, 339: 364–366.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Plikaytis BB, Gelber RH, Shinnick TM: Rapid and sensitive detection ofMycobacterium leprae using a nested-primer gene amplification assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1913–1917.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miyazaki Y, Koga H, Kohno S, Kaku M: Nested polymerase chain reaction ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 2228–2232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Gel electrophoresis of DNA. In: Ford N, Nolan C, Ferguson M (ed): Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Volume I. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1989, p. 6.2–6.62.

  31. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Analysis and cloning of eukaryotic genomic DNA. In: Ford N, Nolan C, Ferguson M (ed): Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Volume II. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1989, p. 9.2–9.62.

  32. Noordhoek GT, Kolk AHJ, Bjune G, Catty D, Dale JW, Fine PEM, Godfrey-Fausset P, Cho S-N, Shinnick T, Svenson SB, Wilson S, van Embden JDA: Sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis: a blind comparison study among seven laboratories. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1994, 32: 277–284.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Persing DH: Polymerase chain reaction: trenches to benches. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 1281–1285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital San Agustín, Camino de Heros 4, E-33400, Avilés, Asturias, Spain

    J. J. Palacios, P. Prendes, J. Rodríguez & H. Villar

  2. Servicio de Neumología, Hospital San Agustín, Camino de Heros 4, E-33400, Avilés, Asturias, Spain

    J. M. García

  3. Servicio de Inmunología, Hospital General de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain

    J. Ferro & S. G. Roces

  4. Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital General de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain

    M. Telenti

  5. Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital General de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain

    A. I. Nicolás

  6. Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital General de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain

    J. F. B. de Quirós

Authors
  1. J. J. Palacios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Ferro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Telenti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. G. Roces
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Prendes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. M. García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. I. Nicolás
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. J. Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. H. Villar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. J. F. B. de Quirós
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palacios, J.J., Ferro, J., Telenti, M. et al. Comparison of solid and liquid culture media with the polymerase chain reaction for detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15, 478–483 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01691315

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01691315

Keywords

Search

Navigation