Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosis of herpetic keratoconjunctivitis by nested polymerase chain reaction in human tear film

  • Note
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was performed to evaluate nested PCR (nPCR) versus viral cultures as method and tear film versus corneal scrapings as specimen in the diagnosis of viral keratoconjunctivitis. Tear film specimens were taken from both eyes and corneal scrapings from the affected eye only in 17 patients with suspected viral keratoconjunctivitis. In 15 of the 17 patients the viral agent of the infection could be detected: 11 patients had herpes simplex virus type 1, two varicella-zoster virus, one both herpes simplex Virus type 1 and varicella-zoster virus, and one adenovirus. Overall there was no significant difference between the detection rate for corneal scrapings (85%) and tear film (75%). In both types of specimens nPCR showed a higher detection rate than viral cultures (corneal scrapings: 87.5% vs 31.25%; tear film: 75% vs 12.5%;P 0.05). For the diagnosis of keratoconjunctivitis nPCR is superior to viral culture and tear film is an adequate sample that is easier to collect, causing the patient less discomfort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaufman HE: Epithelial erosion syndrome: metaherpetic keratitis. American Journal of Ophthalmology (1964) 57:984–987

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pavan-Langston D: Viral diseases: herpetic infections. In: Smolin G, Thoft RA (eds) The cornea. Scientific Foundations and Clinical Practice, Little Brown, Boston, (1987) pp 178–195

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aurelius E, Johansson B, Skoldenberg B, Staland A, Forsgren M: Rapid diagnosis of herpes simplex encephalitis by nested polymerase chain reaction assay of cerebrospinal fluid. Lancet (1991) 337:189–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duglosch D, Eis-Hübinger AM, Klein JP, Kaiser R, Bierhoff E, Schneweis KE: Diagnosis of acute and latent varicella-zoster virus infections using the polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Medical Virology (1991) 35:136–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwok S, Higuchi R: Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature (1989) 339:237–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamoto S, Shimomura Y, Kinoshita S, Nishida K, Yamamoto R, Tano Y: Detection of herpes simplex virus DNA in human tear film by the polymerase chain reaction. American Journal of Ophthalmology (1994) 117:160–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Iuvara A, Dumas M, de Ancos E, Herbort CP: Evaluation de la méthode d'amplification de l'ADN (PCR, polymerase chain reaction) pour le diagnostic de l'herpes oculaire superficiel. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde (1992) 200:472–475

    Google Scholar 

  8. Regis P, Kowalski MS, Gordon YJ, Romanowski EG, Araullo-Cruz T, Kinchington PR: A comparison of enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction with the clinical examination for diagnosing ocular herpetic disease. Ophthalmology (1993) 100:530–533

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hidalgo, F., Melón, S., de Oña, M. et al. Diagnosis of herpetic keratoconjunctivitis by nested polymerase chain reaction in human tear film. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17, 120–123 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01682169

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01682169

Key words

Navigation