Skip to main content
Log in

Über die Großgefieder-Mauser von Schleiereule und Waldkauz

  • Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaft
  • Published:
Journal für Ornithologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two Barnowls(Tyto alba), born in June 1957, were kept in a large aviary for several years. The process of wing and tail moult was closely followed and proved to be very complicated.

The first primary to drop in 1958 was the sixth (from within), which was followed after 46 days by the seventh. All the rest of the ten primaries were shed in 1959 and 1960. This was the sequence:

$$6\frac{{7 - 8 - 9 - 10}}{{5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1}}$$

The chronological rhythm of the proximal series (5 to 1) was independent from that of the distal series (7 to 10). In 1960 the third generation of primaries started to grow, beginning once more with the sixth and, in the same year, ending with the tenth; but the proximal series remained unaffected. At the end of 1960 the primaries were thus of different rank and age, some belonging to the third, others to the second generation. Some of the latter had grown in 1959, others in 1960.

The secondaries followed a sequence not essentially different from that of other owls(Strix, Athene); however, the moult of the first generation was very much protracted. It began in 1958 in ended in 1960. Some of the juvenile secondaries reached an age of three years.

The tail moult started in 1958 with the outer and innermost pair; the rest followed in 1959. No tail feathers were moulted in 1960.

With the Tawny Owl(Strix aluco) the moult is far simpler. Two birds taken from the same nest at the end of April 1959 moulted all ten primaries in 1960 following the descending mode, and practically all secondaries in the same sequence asAthene. The twelve tail feathers dropped within a few days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Heinroth, O. (1898). Über den Verlauf der Schwingen- und Schwanzmauser der Vögel; Sitz. Ber. Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin 1898, p. 96–118.

  • Mayr, E. u. M. (1954). The tail molt of small owls; The Auk 71: 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mebs, Th. (1960). Untersuchungen über den Rhythmus der Schwingen- und Schwanzmauser bei großen Falken; J. f. Orn. 101, p. 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piechocki, R. (1955). Über Verhalten, Mauser und Umfärbung einer gekäfigten Steppenweihe (Circus macrourus); J. f. Orn. 96, p. 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1956). Über die Mauser eines gekäfigten Turmfalken (Falco tinnunculus); J. f. Orn. 97, p. 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbacher, J. (1955). Über die Schwanzmauser der Eulen (Strigidae) und Nachtschwalben (Caprimulgidae); Senck. biol. 36, p. 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheyen, R. (1956). La mue de la queue chez les Hiboux et les Chouettes (Striges); Gerfaut, 46, p. 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piechocki, R. Über die Großgefieder-Mauser von Schleiereule und Waldkauz. J Ornithol 102, 220–225 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01671638

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01671638

Navigation