Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does balloon dilatation and anal sphincter training improve ileoanal-pouch function?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although patients' satisfaction may be high after restorative proctocolectomy the functional results are still far from perfect. Increased bowel frequency and imperfection in continence are common. Pouch volume and anal sphincter status are important determinants for the outcome. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if balloon dilatation of the pouch and sphincter biofeedback training might improve the results. Forty patients with an ileo-pouch anal anastomosis were randomized into a control and a treatment group. During the interval with a diverting ileostomy, patients in the latter group were subjected to balloon dilatation of the pouch and sphincter biofeedback training by using a manovolumetric technique. All patients were functionally assessed and anorectal manovolumetry performed preoperatively and at regular intervals postoperatively. Follow-up time was at least 12 months. Immediately before ileostomy take down patients in the treatment group showed a significant initial increase in pouch compliance compared with controls. However, a rapid and pronounced increase in pouch volume occurring after ileostomy closure in the control group equalized this initial difference. Anal resting tone and maximum squeezing capacity were at all intervals similar in the two groups. Bowel frequency per 24 h was similar and mucus soiling occurred to a similar extent in both groups, and the overall functional result as assessed according to a scoring system was equal at each interval. Balloon dilatation of the pouch and sphincter exercises appear not to be essential measures in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nicholls RJ, Pescatori M, Motson RW, Petzim ME (1984) Restorative proctocolectomy with a three loop reservoir. Ann Surg 199:383–388

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nicholls RJ, Lubowski DZ (1987) Restorative proctocolectomy — the four loop (W) reservoir. Br J Surg 74:564–566

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rothenberger DP, Wong WD, Buls JG, Goldberg SM, Christensson CE (1984) Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. Dig Surg 1:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  4. Becker JM, Raymond JL (1986) Ileal pouch anastomosis. A single surgeon's experience with 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 204:375–383

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hultén L (1986) Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir (symposium). Int J Colorect Dis 1:2–19

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dozois RR (1985) Alternatives to conventional ileostomy. Year Book Medical Publ. Inc., Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholls RJ, Pezim M (1985) Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 72:470–474

    Google Scholar 

  8. O'Connell PR, Pemberton JH, Brown ML, Kelly KA (1987) Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Am J Surg 153:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacIntyre I, Balfour T (1972) Results of the Lord non-operative treatment for haemorrhoids. Lancet 1:1094–1096

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keighley MRB (1987) Abdominal mucosectomy reduces the incidence of soiling and sphincter damage after restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 30:386–390

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cerulli MA, Nikoomanesh P, Schuster MM (1979) Progress in biofeedback conditioning for faecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 76:742–746

    Google Scholar 

  12. Telander RL, Perreault J, Hoffman AD (1981) Early development of the neorectum by balloon dilatation after ileoanal anastomoses. J Pediatr Surg 16:911–916

    Google Scholar 

  13. Åkervall S, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Öresland T, Hultén S (1988) Manovolumetry: a new method for investigation of anorectal function. Gut 29:614–623

    Google Scholar 

  14. Snooks S, Henry M, Swash M (1984) Faecal incontinence after anal dilatation. Br J Surg 71:617–618

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fonkalsrud EW (1980) Total colectomy and endorectal ileal pull-through with internal ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis. Surg Gyn Obstet 150:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martin LW, LeCoultre C, Schubert WK (1977) Total colectomy with preservation of continence in ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 186:477–480

    Google Scholar 

  17. Berglund B, Brevinge H, Kock NG, Lindholm E (1987) Expansion of various types of ileal reservoirs in situ. An experimental study in rats. Eur Surg Res 19:298–304

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Öresland, T., Fasth, S., Hultén, L. et al. Does balloon dilatation and anal sphincter training improve ileoanal-pouch function?. Int J Colorect Dis 3, 153–157 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01648358

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01648358

Keywords

Navigation