Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical experience with cefotaxime for the therapy of bacteremias due to gram-positive organisms

Klinische Erfahrung mit Cefotaxim in der Therapie grampositiver Bakteriämien

  • Originalia
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Fifty-five patients with gram-positive bacteremias were treated with cefotaxime after enrollment in comparative and non-comparative study protocols. Forty-nine of these 55 patients were evaluable and followed for their response to therapy and adverse effects. Most patients were white males 50 years of age or older (69%); 45% had two or more serious underlying diseases. Pneumonias caused 59% of these bacteremias, which were etiologically due toStreptococcus pneumoniae (22 episodes),Staphylococcus aureus (15), coagulase-negative staphylococci (3) and other streptococci (12). Overall, 90% of bacteremias were cured with cefotaxime therapy. Among five treatment failures were included three deaths, one due to cefotaxime-associated pseudomembranous colitis, one caused by a bacteremic superinfection due toPseudomonas aeruginosa and one due to a progressive pneumonia despite therapy. Adverse effects of therapy were infrequent and noteworthy for only one patient with questionable nephrotoxicity and a lack of cefotaxime-associated coagulopathy.

Zusammenfassung

55 Patienten mit grampositiven Bakteriämien wurden nach Zuordnung zu Studienprotokollen, die entweder für Vergleichsstudien konzipiert waren oder für nicht vergleichende Studien, mit Cefotaxim behandelt. Von diesen 55 Patienten standen 49 für eine Auswertung bezüglich Therapie-Erfolg und Nebenwirkungen zur Verfügung. Die meisten Patienten waren Kaukasier im Alter von 50 Jahren oder darüber (69%). 45% hatten zwei oder mehr ernsthafte Grundkrankheiten. 59% der Bakteriämien gingen von Pneumonien aus, die durchStreptococcus pneumoniae (22 Fälle),Staphylococcus aureus (15), koagulasenegative Staphylokokken (3) und andere Streptokokken (12) verursacht waren. Insgesamt wurden 90% der Bakteriämien unter Cefotaximtherapie geheilt. Unter den fünf Therapieversagern waren drei Todesfälle, von denen einer auf eine mit der Cefotaximbehandlung assoziierte pseudomembranöse Colitis zurückzuführen war, einer durchPseudomonas aeruginosa und einer durch die trotz Therapie fortschreitende Pneumonie bedingt war. Nebenwirkungen traten nur selten auf und sind nur bei einem Patienten mit fraglicher Nephrotoxizität erwähnenswert; eine Koagulopathie trat im Zusammenhang mit Cefotaximtherapie nicht auf.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Counts, G. W., Turck, M. Antibacterial activity of a new parenteral cephalosporin — HR 756: comparison with cefamandole and ceforanide. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 16 (1979) 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T., Brumfitt, W., Reynolds, A. V. Cefotaxime (HR 756), a new cephalosporin with exceptional broad-spectrum activityin vitro. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 4 (1978) 437–444.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Murray, P. R. Activity of cefotaxime-aminoglycoside combinations against aminoglycoside-resistantPseudomonas. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 17 (1980) 474–476.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neu, H. C., Aswapokee, N., Aswapokee, P., Fu, K. P. HR 756, a new cephalosporin active against gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 15 (1979) 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sosna, J. P., Murray P. R., Medoff, G. Comparison of thein vitro activities of HR 756 with cephalothin, cefoxitin, and cefamandole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 14 (1978) 876–879.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mouton, R. P., Bongaerts, G. P. A., van Gestel, M. Comparison of activity and beta-lactamase stability of cefotaxime with those of six other cephalosporins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 16 (1979) 757–760.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peters, G., Pulverer, G. Comparativein vitro activity of cefotaxime (HR 756). Chemotherapy 26 (1980) 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ramirez-Ronda, C. H., Nevarez, M., Saavedra, S., Bermudez, R. H. Comparativein vitro activity of moxalactam and cefotaxime againist isolates from blood culture. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 7 (1981) 629–635.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muytjens H. L., van der Ros-van de Repe, J. Comparative activities of 13 ß-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 21 (1982) 925–934.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neu, H. C. The new beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins. Ann. Intern. Med. 97 (1982) 408–419.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Landesman, S. H., Corrado, M. L., Cherubin, C. E., Sierra, M. F. Activity of moxalactam and cefotaxime alone and in combination with ampicillin or penicillin aganinst group B streptococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 19 (1981) 794–797.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cherubin, C. E., Corrado, M. L., Sierra, M. F., Gombert, M. E., Shulman, M. Susceptibility of gram-positive cocci to various antibiotics, including cefotaxime, moxalactam, andN-formimidoyl thienamycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 20 (1981) 553–555.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moellering, R. C., Jr. Enterococcal infections in patients treated with moxalactam. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4 Suppl. (1982) S708-S711.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, V. Enterococcal superinfection and colonization after therapy with moxalactam, a new broad spectrum antibiotic. Ann. Intern. Med. 94 (1981) 784–785.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thornsberry, C., Sahm, D. F. Effect of media and blood on the antimicrobial activity of cephalosporins on serogroup D streptococci: a review. Diag. Microbial. Infect. Dis. 2 (1984) 75S-84S.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Francke, E. L., Neu, H. C. Use of cefotaxime, aβ-lactamase stable cephalosporin, in the therapy of serious infections, including those due to multiresistant organisms. Am. J. Med. 71 (1981) 435–442.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schleupner, C. J., Engle, J. C. Clinical evaluation of cefotaxime for therapy of lower respiratory tract infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 21 (1982) 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mullaney, D. T., John, J. F. Cefotaxime therapy. Evaluation of its effect on bacterial meningitis, CSF drug levels, and bactericidal activity. Arch. Intern. Med. 143 (1983) 1705–1708.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meyers, B. R. Clinical experience with cefotaxime in the treatment of patients with bacteremia. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4 Suppl. (1982) S411-S415.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Madsen, P. O. Treatment of urinary tract infections with cefotaxime: noncomparative and prospective comparative trials. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4 Suppl. (1982) S416-S420.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Perkins, R. L. Clinical trials of cefotaxime for the treatment of bacterial infections of the lower respiratory tract. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4 Suppl. (1982) S421-S431.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kemmerich, B., Lode, H., Belmega, G., Jendroschek, T., Borner, K., Koeppe, P. Comparative pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 23 (1983) 429–434.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schrinner, E., Limbert, M., Seeger, K., Seibert, G., Novick, W. J., Jr. Thein vitro antimicrobial activity of desacetyl-cefotaxime compared to other relatedβ-lactams. Diag. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2 (1984) 13S-20S.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jones, R. N., Barry, A. L., Packer, R. R. The activity of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime alone and in combination against anaerobes and staphylococci. Diag. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2 (1984) 37S-46S.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bauer, A. W., Kirby, W. M. M., Sherris, J. C., Turck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 45 (1966) 493–496.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fuchs, P. C., Barry, A. L., Thornsberry, C., Jones, R. N., Gavan, T. L., Gerlach, E. H., Sommers, H. M. Cefotaxime:in vitro activity and tentative interpretive standards for disk susceptibility testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 18 (1980) 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ericsson, H. M., Sherris, J. C. Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. Sect. B Suppl. (1971) 2–90.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith, C. R. Cefotaxime and cephalosporins: adverse reactions in perspective. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4 Suppl. (1982) S481-S488.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thornsberry, C., Jones, R. N., Barry A. L., Fuchs, P. C. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests with cefotaxime and correlation with clinical bacteriologic response. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4 Suppl. (1982) S316-S324.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ings, R. M. J., Fillastre, J. P., Godin, M., Leroy, A., Humbert, G. The pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and its metabolites in subjects with normal and impaired renal function. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4 Suppl. (1982) S379-S391.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wise, R., Wills, P. J., Andrews, J. M., Bedford, K. A. Activity of the cefotaxime (HR 756) desacetyl metabolite compared with those of cefotaxime and other cephalosporins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 17 (1980) 84–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schleupner, C.J. Clinical experience with cefotaxime for the therapy of bacteremias due to gram-positive organisms. Infection 13 (Suppl 1), S28–S33 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01644214

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01644214

Keywords

Navigation