Резюме
Меmо¶rt;ом лuнеaрuзaцuu выве¶rt;ены aнaлumuческuе формулu ¶rt;ля рaсчеma рa¶rt;uусa — некmорa, в коmорыцх uсnользовaны коэффuцuенmы рaзложенuя внешне
о
рaвumaцuонно
о nоля Землu u naрaмеmры земно
о эллunсоu¶rt;a. Прu вuво¶rt;е формулы uсnолвзовaна блuзосmь коэффuцuенmов розложенuя nоmенцuaлa u коэффuцuенmов рaзложенuя рa¶rt;uусa — векmорa. Сре¶rt;неквa¶rt;рamuческaя ошuбкa, вызвaннaя лuнеaрuзaцuеŭ, nоря¶rt;кa 1 мм. Прuве¶rt;ены чuсленные рaсчеmы ¶rt;ля мо¶rt;елu
рaвumaцuонно
о nоля GEM-L2. Нaмu nолученнaя nоверхносmв оmклоняеmся оm чaсmо nрuменяемоŭ annроксuмaцuu
еоu¶rt;a, основaнноŭ нa mеореме Брунсa, в nре¶rt;елaх ± 90 см.
Summary
The problem of inverting the geopotential series with respect to the geoid radius has been solved. A linearization of the radius powers, making use of a reference surface, has been applied. The body given by the Bruns' formula has been chosen as the reference surface. Corrections to the Bruns' formula in an analytical explicit form have been derived. An internal linearization accuracy of the order of 1 mm has been achieved. The geoid radius coefficients for the GEM-L2 model have been evaluated numerically. The corrections have been found to range from −90 to 90 cm.
References
M. Burša: On the figure of the Earth's equipotential surface from satellite orbit dynamics. Studia geoph. et geod., 13 (1969), 1.
M. Burša: Potential of the geoidal surface, the scale factor for lengths and Earth's figure parameters from satellite observations. Studia geoph. et geod., 13 (1969), 337.
B. Eitschberger: Ein geodätisches Weltdatum aus Terrestrischen und Satellitdaten. DGK, H. Nr. 245, München 1978.
D. P. Hajela: Optimal estimation of high degree gravity field from a global set of 1° × 1° anomalies to degree and order 250. Rep. 358, Dep. Geod. Sci., Ohio Univ., Columbus 1984.
W. Heiskanen, H. Moritz: Physical geodesy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco 1976.
M. A. Khan: Some geophysical and geodetic contributions of satellite-determined gravity results. Geophys. Surveys, 2 (1976), 469.
J. Klokočník, J. Pospišilová: Intercomparison of the Earth's models by means of lumped coefficients. Planet. Space Sci., 29 (1981), 653.
K. Lambeck, R. Coleman: The Earth's shape and gravity field: a report of progress from 1958 to 1982. Geoph. J. R. astr. Soc., 74 (1983), 25.
F. J. Lerch, S. M. Klosko, G. B. Patel, C. A. Wagner: A gravity model for crustal dynamics (GEM-L2). J. Geoph. Res., 90 (1985), 9301.
F. J. Lerch, S. M. Klosko, C. A. Wagner, G. B. Patel: On the accuracy of recent Goddard gravity models. J. Geoph. Res., 90 (1985), 9312.
K. Pěč, Z. Martinec: Expansion of geoid heights into a spherical harmonic series. Studia geoph. et geod., 26 (1982), 115.
K. Pěč, Z. Martinec: Expansion of geoid heights over a triaxial Earth's ellipsoid into a spherical harmonic series. Studia geoph. et geod., 27 (1983), 217.
M. Pick, J. Pícha, V. Vyskočil: Úvod ke studiu tihového pole Země. Academia, Praha 1973.
R. H. Rapp: Methods for the computation of geoid undulations from potential coefficients. Bull. Geod., 101 (1971), 283.
R. H. Rapp: Geos 3 data processing for the recovery of geoid undulations and gravity anomalies. J. Geoph. Res., 84 (1979), 3784.
R. H. Rapp, R. Rummel: Methods for the commutation of detailed geoids and their accuracy. Rep. 233, Dep. Geod. Sci., Ohio State Univ., Columbus 1975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martinec, Z., Pěč, K. Global geoidal undulations as inferred from the Bruns formula and from inversion of the geopotential series. Stud Geophys Geod 31, 228–251 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01624755
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01624755