Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the relationship between broadband ultrasound attenuation and bone mineral density at the calcaneus using BUA imaging and DXA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purposes of this study was to determine the relationship between broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and bone mineral density (BMD) measured at different regions of the calcaneus with identical site-matched regions of interest (ROIs). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of the calcaneus and BUA imaging were performed in 30 women (15 premenopausal and 15 postmenopausal). Four square ROIs were located in the great tuberosity and one square ROI in the foramen calcaneus. A ROI adapted to the shape and size of the whole calcaneus was also considered. All ROIs were analyzed three times with both techniques to minimize intra-observer variability. The correlation coefficient between attenuation and frequency was used as an index of BUA measurement error. Before accepting a measurement of BUA in inhomogeneous material, it could be useful to map the spatial variations of the measurement error. In all ROIs we found the BUA and BMD were strongly related (r=0.78−0.91,p<0.001). The correlation between BUA and BMD was slightly higher in the inferior part of the posterior tuberosity than in the superior part and in the foramen calcaneus. The very high correlation between attenuation and frequency found in all ROIs (r=0.99) suggests that measurement errors of propagation were probably not significant. Ultrasound imaging yields the opportunity for studying the spatial acoustic properties in the calcaneus and their relation to bone mass or structural parameters provided by independent imaging techniques. BUA measured with current transmission techniques reflects mainly bone mass, and microarchitecture to a smaller extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Consensus development conference. Prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1991;90:107–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Langton CM, Palmer SB, Porter SW. The measurement of broadband ultrasound attenuation in cancellous bone. Eng Med 1984;13:89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Porter RW, Miller CG, Grainger D, et al. Prediction of hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective study. BMJ 1990;301:638–41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, et al. Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the Epidos prospective study. Lancet 1996;348:511–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McKelvie ML, Fordman J, Clifford C, et al. In vitro comparison of quantitative computer tomography and broadband ultrasonic attenuation of trabecular bone. Bone 1989;10:101–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tavakoli MB, Evans JA. The effect of bone structure on ultrasonic attenuation and velocity. Ultrasonics 1992;30:389–95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glüer CC, Wu CY, Genant HK. Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation: an in vitro study. Osteoporos Int 1993;3:185–91.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schott AM, Weill-Engerer S, Hans D, et al. Ultrasound discriminates patients with hip fracture equally as well as a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and independently of bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10, 2:243–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bauer DC, Glüer CC, Genant HK, et al. for the Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:353–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glüer CC, Vahlensieck M, Faulkner KG, et al. Site-matched calcaneal measurements of broadband ultrasound attenuation and single X-ray absorptiometry: do they measure different skeletal properties? J Bone Miner Res 1992;9:1071–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Waud CE, Lew R, Baran DT. The relationship between ultrasound and densitometric measurements of bone mass at the calcaneus in women. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;51:415–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roux C, Lemonnier E, Kolta S, et al. Broadband ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus and bone density measurements. Rev Rhum 1993;60:771–80.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Salamone LM, Krall EA, Harris S, et al. Comparison of broadband ultrasound attenuation to single X-ray absorptiometry measurements at the calcaneus in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 1994;54:87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brooke-Wavell K, Jones PEM, Pye DW. Ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry measurement of the calcaneus: influence of region of interest location. Calcif Tissue Int 1995;57:20–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ross P, Huang C, Davis J, et al. Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound. Bone 1995; 16:325–32.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Laugier P, Berger G, Giat P, et al. Ultrasound attenuation imaging in the os calcis: an improved method. Ultrasound Imaging 1994;16:65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Laugier P, Fournier B, Berger G. Ultrasound parametric imaging of the calcaneus: in vivo results with a new device. Calcif Tissue Int 1996;58:326–31.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evans WD, Jones ES, Owen GM. Factors affecting the in vivo precision of broadband ultrasonic attenuation. Phys Med Biol 1995;40:137–51.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chivers RC. Measurement of ultrasonic attenuation in inhomogeneous media. Acustica 1991;74:8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roux C, Fournier B, Laugier P, et al. Broadband ultrasound attenuation imaging: a new imaging method in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:1112–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aggarwall ND, Singh GD, Aggarwall R, et al. A survey of osteoporosis using the calcaneus as an index. Int Orthop 1986;10:147–53.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods, 6fh edn. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 19.

  23. McCloskey EV, Murray SA, Charlesworth D, et al. Assessment of broadband ultrasound attenuation in the os calcis in vitro. Clin Sci 1990;78:221–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zagzebski JA, Rossman PJ, Mesina C, et al. Ultrasound transmission measurements through the os calcis. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;4:107–11.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Glüer CC, Wu CY, Genant HK. Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation: an in vitro study. Osteoporos Int 1993;3:185–91.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nicholson PHF, Haddaway MJ, Davie MWJ. The dependence of ultrasonic properties on orientation in human vertebral bone. Phys Med Biol 1994;39:1013–24.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Njeh CF, Hodgskinson R, Currey JD, et al. Orthogonal relationships between ultrasonic velocity and material properties of bovine cancellous bone. Med Eng Phys 1996;18:373–81.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Langton CM, Njeh CF, Hodgskinson R, et al. Prediction of mechanical properties of the human calcaneus by broadband ultrasonic attenuation. Bone 1996;18:495–503.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Laugier P, Droin P, Laval-Jeantet AM, et al. In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and QCT. Bone (in press).

  30. Hans D, Arlot ME, Schott AM, et al. Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the microarchitecture of bone than the bone mass? A two dimensional histomorphometric study. Bone 1995;16:295–300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chappard, C., Laugier, P., Fournier, B. et al. Assessment of the relationship between broadband ultrasound attenuation and bone mineral density at the calcaneus using BUA imaging and DXA. Osteoporosis Int 7, 316–322 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623771

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623771

Keywords

Navigation