Summary
Micro-surgery of plant cells shows that the impression of fluidity which one gets from mere microscopic observation is illusory. The cytoplasm in fact is always more or less elastic, even when “streaming”. Moreover only a portion of its substance moves, so that there is no inherent difficulty in assuming a structural basis of organization.
The resting nucleus, also, is not devoid of structure, as is claimed to be the case in animal cells. Sometimes a gelatinous framework is conspicuous, and such a condition grades into cases where there appears to be only a flimsy structure permeating a liquid medium. There thus seems to be no reason, as far as plant cells are concerned, for denying the existence of a persistent framework which might account for the genetic continuity of the chromosomes.
In the architectural organization of the cell the most important element, apart from the immobile gelatinous matrix, is the active film- and fibril-forming differentiation whichStrasburger termed the “Kinoplasm”. Its behaviour and metamorphoses, as observed by the writer, support and amplifyStrasburger's conception and indicate that the analogy it presents with the myelin forms of lecithin may rest on chemical and structural similarity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baas-Becking L. G. H. andHenriette v d. Sande-Bakhuyzen. “The Physical State of Protoplasm.” Paper at meeting of A. A. A. S., Dec. 1926. — (forthcoming Number Journ. Gen. Physiol.)
Chambers, R. “The structure of the cells in tissues as revealed by microdissection.” Amer. Journ. Anal,35, 385–402, 1925.
Conklin, E. G. Effects of centrifugal force on the structure and development of eggs of Crepidula. Journ. Exp. Zool.,22, 311–373, 1917.
— -, “Cellular Differentiation” in “General Cytology”, Cowdry, 1924.
Freundlich, H. andW. Seifriz. „Über die Elastizität von Solen und Gelen.“ Zeitschr. f. phys. Chem.,104, 233–261, 1923.
Gatenby, J. B. “The oögenesis of Lumbricus.” Nature,118, 840–841, 1926.
Gorter, E, andF. Grendel. “On bimolecular layers of lipoids on the chromocytes of blood.” Journ. Exp. Med.,41, 439, 1925.
— —, “Muscular Contraction.” Nature,117, 552–553, 1926.
Guillermond, A. “Les constituents morphologiques du cytoplasm d'après les recherches récentes de cytologie végétale.” Bull. Biol. de la France et de la Belge,54, 1920, and later papers.
Guthrie, M. J. “Cytoplasmic inclusions in cross activated eggs of Teleosts.” Zeitschr. f. Zellforsch, u. mikr. Anat., 2, 1925.
Haberlandt, G. „Über fibrilläre Plasmastrukturen.“ Ber. d. deutsch. bot. Ges., 19, 1 Tab., 1901.
Harper, R. A. “Cell Division in Sporogonia and Asci.” Ann. Bot.,13, 467–524, 1899.
Heilbrunn, L. V. “The Physical Structure of the Protoplasm of Sea Urchin Eggs.” Am. Nat.,60, 143–156, 1926.
— —, “The absolute viscosity of protoplasm.” Journ. Exp. Zool.,44, 255–278, 1926.
Kite, G. L. “Studies on the physical structure of protoplasm.” Am. Journ. Physiol.,32, 146–164, 1913.
Klebs, G. „Über die Bildung der Fortpflanzungszellen beiHydrodictyon utriculatum.“ Bot. Zeit.,49, 789–862, 1891.
Küster, E. „Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Plasmolyse.” Protoplasma,1, 73–104, 1926.
Kuwada, Y. andSakamura, T. “A contribution to the colloidchemical and morphological study of chromosomes”. Protoplasma,1, 239–254, 1926.
Lloyd, F. E. “Maturation and conjugation inSpirogyra.” Trans. Roy. Can. Inst.,15, 151–193, 1926.
Lloyd, F. E. andScarth, G. W. “The origin of vacuoles.” Science, N. S.,63, 459–460, 1926.
Mayer, A., F.Rathery and G.Schaeffer. “Les granulations ou mitochondries de la cellule hépatique.” Journ. de Physiol. et de Pathol. gen.,16, 1914.
Nassonov, D. „Der Exkretionsapparat des Protozoen als Homologon des Golgischen Apparates der Metazoazellen.” Arch. f. mikr. Anat. u. Entwicklungsmech.,103, 437–482, 1924.
Nichols, S. P. “Methods of healing in some algal cells.” Am. Journ. Bot.,9, 18–27, 1922.
Overton, J. B. “The morphology of the Ascocarp and spore formation in the manyspored Asci ofThecotheus Pelletieri.” Bot. Gaz.,42, 450–492, 1906.
Parat, M. andJ. Painlévé. „Sur l'exacte concordance des caractères du vacuome et de l'appareil Golgi classique.“ Comptes Rendus des Séances de l'Acad. de Sc.,179, 543–544, 1924, and other papers.
Seifriz, W. “Elasticity and some structural features of soap solutions.” Colloid Symp. Monograph, p. 1–16, 1924.
— —, “Elasticity as an indication of protoplasmic structure.” Am.Nat.,60, 124–132, 1926.
— —, “Protoplasmic papillae of Echinarachnius oocytes.” Protoplasma, 1, 1–14, 1926.
Strasburger, Ed. „Die Zelle und Zelltheilung.“ 1875.
— —, „Über Cytoplasmastrukturen, Kern- und Zelltheilung.“ Jahr. f. wiss. Bot.,30, 375–405, 1897.
Swingle, Deane. “Formation of the spores in Sporangia ofRhizopus nigricans andPhycomyces nitens.” U. S. Dept. Agric., Bur. Plant Ind., Bull. No. 37, 1903.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scarth, G.W. The structural organization of plant protoplasm in the light of micrurgy. Protoplasma 2, 189–205 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01604720
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01604720