Skip to main content
Log in

Biocide susceptibility and intracellular glutathione inEscherichia coli

  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology

Summary

Inhibition of growth and speed of kill by biocides with different mechanisms of action was examined with respect to intracellular glutathione levels. strain deficient in intracellular glutathione was hypersusceptible to electrophilic biocides, with the exception of an isothiazolone biocide. Growth inhibition by quaternary ammonium compounds and radical-generating biocides was unaffected by intracellular glutathione levels. Speed of kill experiments demonstrated a faster rate of killing by formaldehyde in both log and stationary phase cultures of the glutathione-deficient strain as compared to its wild-type parent. Glutathione levels had no effect on the speed of kill by hydrogen peroxide in log phase cultures, but resulted in an increased rate of killing in stationary phase cultures. Stationary phase cultures of the glutathione-deficient strain were killed by a quaternary ammonium biocide at a slower than the glutathione-replete strain. These studies provide information about both the mechanism of action of biocides as well as the role of glutathione in determining microbicide susceptibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ames, J.R., M.D. Ryan and P. Kovacic. 1987. Mechanism of antibacterial action: electron transfer and oxy radicals. J. Free Radicals Biol. Med. 2: 377–391.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Block, S.S. 1991. Preservatives for industrial products. In: Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation (Block, S.S. ed.), pp. 608–655, Lea and Farbiger, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, M.R.W. and P. Williams. 1985. Influence of substrate limitation and growth phase on sensitivity to antimicrobial agents. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 15: Suppl.A: 7–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collier, P.J., A. Ramsey, P. Austin and P. Gilbert. 1990. Growth inhibitory and biocidal activity of some isothiazolone biocides. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 69: 569–577.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuchs, J.A. and H.R. Warner. 1975. Isolation of anEscherichia coli mutant deficient in glutathione biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 124: 140–148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbert, P., P.J. Collier and M.W. Brown. 1990. Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy, and stringent response. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34: 1865–1868.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenberg, J.T. and B. Demple. 1986. Glutathione inEscherichia coli is dispensable for resistance to H2O2 and gamma radiation. J. Bacteriol. 168: 1026–1029.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffith, O.W. 1982. Mechanism of action, metabolism, and toxicity of buthionine sulfoximine and its higher homologs, potent inhibitors of glutathione synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 257: 13704–13712.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hassan, H.M. and I. Fridovich. 1979. Paraquat andEscherichia coli: mechanism of production of extracellular superoxide radical. J. Biol. Chem. 254: 10846–10852.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ku, R.H. and R.E. Billings. 1986. The role of mitochondrial glutathione and cellular protein sulfhydryls in formaldehyde toxicity in glutathione depleted rate hepatocytes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 247: 183–189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Law, A.B., J.N. Moss and E.S. Lashen. 1984. Kathon CG: a new single component, broad spectrum preservative system for cosmetics and toiletries. In: Cosmetic and Drug Preservation (Kabara, J.J., ed.), pp. 129–142, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meister, A. and M.E. Anderson. 1983. Glutathione. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 52: 711–760.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Owens, A.R. and P.E. Hartman. 1986. Export of glutathione by some widely usedSalmonella typhimurium andEscherichia coli strains. J. Bacteriol. 168: 109–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmitt, H.G. 1987. Action of antimicrobial substances. Parfumerie and Kosmetik 68: 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shepherd, R.J., R.D. Waigh and P. Gilbert. 1988. Antibacterial action of 2-bromo-2-nitropropan-1,3-diol (Bronopol). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32: 1693–1698.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, J. and A. Schrift. 1974. Phylogenetic distribution of glutathione peroxidase. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 63B: 3944–3958.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stretton, R.J. and T.W. Manson. 1973. Some aspects of the mode of action of the antibacterial compound Bronopol (2-bromo-2-nitropropan-1,3-diol). J. Appl. Bacteriol. 36: 61–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, J.S., Diehl, M.A. & Lyman, R.C. Biocide susceptibility and intracellular glutathione inEscherichia coli . Journal of Industrial Microbiology 12, 403–407 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569672

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569672

Key words

Navigation