Skip to main content
Log in

Genetics of histocompatibility in mice

II. Survey for interactions between minor (Non-H-2) antigens by skin grafting

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Immunogenetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty-five congenic mouse strains differing at distinguishable minor (non-H−2) histocompatibility loci were paired in 71 different combinations. F1 offspring were used as skin-graft donors for more than 4000 recipients to test whether immune responses to parental strain antigens were statistically independent. Thirty-four (48 percent) of the 71 combinations were predicted adequately by an independent response hypothesis. A simple additive model was consistent with 39 (55 percent) of the observed responses, although 18 of these were among those in agreement with the independent hypothesis. A synergistic response faster than that predicted by either the independent or additive response model was seen in 12 (17 percent) of the combinations. The remaining 5 percent were not well described by any of these models. No strain was represented with unusual frequency among those involved in synergistic interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, D. W.: Histoincompatibility associated with the X chromosome in mice.Transplantation 1: 70–74, 1963

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. W.: Cumulative effect or independent effect?Transplantation 11: 419–421, 1971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. W.: Genetics of histocompatibility in mice. I. New loci and congenic lines.Immunogenetics 2: 249–256, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. W. and Usama, B.: A rapid method of grafting skin on tails of mice.Transplant. Bull. 7: 424–425, 1960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnet, F. M.:The Clonal Selection Theory of Acquired Immunity. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1959

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, R. J., Silvers, W. K., Billingham, R. E., Hildemann, W. H., and Snell, G. D.: The cumulative effect of histocompatibility.Transplantation 4: 605–617, 1966

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKhann, C. F.: Regional lymph node response to skin grafts between strains of mice differing by strong and weak histocompatibility antigens.J. Surg. Res. 1: 294–298, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  • McKhann, C.F.: Additive effects of multiple weak incompatibilities in transplantation immunity.Nature 201: 937–938, 1964

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pross, H. F. and Eidinger, D.: Antigenic competition: A review of non-specific antigen induced suppression.Adv. Immunol. 18: 133–168, 1974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, W. and Horwitz, C.: Graft rejections in paternal to F1 hybrid and reciprocal hybrid grafts indicating a histocompatibility gene on the mouse X chromosome.Lab. Invest. 18: 298–303, 1968

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S.:Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. F.:Statistical Methods, p. 124, Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, M., Bleiberg, I., and Leibovici, J.: Histological criteria for immunological rejection of mouse skin homografts.J. Pathol. 122: 1–7, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, L.L., Bailey, D.W. & Mobraaten, L.E. Genetics of histocompatibility in mice. Immunogenetics 11, 363–372 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01567803

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01567803

Keywords

Navigation