Abstract
Some 28 nuclear medicine departments out of a total of 40 participated in a nationwide Austrian interlaboratory comparison of the imaging quality of gamma cameras. The participation was voluntary, and confidentiality of the individual results was guaranteed. The survey was completed within 2 months, employing instructors to administrate the tests. An emission phantom simulating a flood field with non-uniformities was imaged by 43 cameras, and 54 images were evaluated. The test images were read by the participants using a graded rating scale to indicate the probability of the presence of a non-uniformity in the various parts of the image. The rating data were used to construct individual ROC curves for each image. The area under the ROC curve was used as the ranking parameter for image quality. The results show a spread of the ROC areas between 0.6 and 0.99, with a median of 0.81. A correlation was found between the year of installation and the ROC area obtained from the gamma camera, indicating improvements of performance in more recent cameras, which accounts for part of the variation of the ROC areas. The remaining variations are due to differences in the performance of the gamma cameras. Feedback was provided to the participants by describing individual performance with respect to the true structure of the phantom and by comparing this performance with that of the group. A questionnaire accompanying the test phantom yielded information about the practice of routine quality control and about details of the acquisition and analysis of images. The survey demonstrated the feasibility and usefulness of interlaboratory comparisons of this type even for a small number of participants. The feedback was found by the participants to be helpful and stimulated awareness of the importance of quality control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergmann H, Wegst AV, Ganatra R, Souchkevitch GN (1988) Inter-laboratory comparison study of nuclear medicine imaging devices — results of a joint IAEA/WHO quality control survey in 43 countries. In: Bergmann H (ed) Medical Physics '87, Proc Ann Soc Meeting, OeGMP-DGMP-EFOMP, Innsbruck 1987, pp 590–597
FDA (1984) Workshop on imaging instrumentation quality control—recommendations. In: Quality Assurance in Nuclear Medicine, Radiological Health Quality Assurance Series, HEW Publication (FDA) 84-8224, pp 160–166
Green DM, Swets JA (1974) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Krieger, Huntington
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36
Hermann GA, Herrera NE, Hauser W (1977) Rationale, techniques and results of a quality control program of imaging procedures. In: Medical Radionuclide Imaging, IAEA Vienna 1977, pp 55–65
Hermann GA, Herrera NE, Sugiura HT (1982) Comparison of inter-laboratory data in terms of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) indices. J Nucl Med 23:525–531
Herrera NE, Hermann GA, Hauser W, Paras P (1981) College of American Pathologists program series X survey program. In: Medical Radionuclide Imaging 1980, IAEA Vienna 1981, pp 177–181
IAEA (1984) Quality control of nuclear medicine instruments. IAEA-TECDOC-317, IAEA Vienna
Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8:283–289
Souchkevitch GN, Asikainen M, Baeuml A, Bergmann H, Busemann-Sokole E, Carlsson S, Delaloye B, Dermentzoglou F, Herrera NE, Jasinski W, Karanfilski B, Mester J, Oppelt A, Perry J, Skretting A, van Herk G, Volodin V, Wegst A, Mould RF (1988) The World Health Organization and International Atomic Energy Agency second inter-laboratory comparison study in 16 countries on quality performance of nuclear medicine imaging devices. Eur J Nucl Med 10:495–501
Swets JA, Pickett RM (1982) Evaluation of diagnostic systems. Academic, New York
Volodin V, Souchkevitch G, Racoveanu N, Bergmann H, Busemann-Sokole E, Delaloye B, Dermentzoglou F, Georgescu G, Herrera NE, Jasinski W, Kasatkin Y, Paras P, Mould R (1985) World Health Organisation inter-laboratory comparison study in 12 countries on quality performance of nuclear medicine imaging devices. Eur J Nucl Med 13:495–501
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bergmann, H., Hoebart, J. & Kugi, A. External quality control of gamma cameras —results of an inter-laboratory comparison study in Austria. Eur J Nucl Med 16, 23–28 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01566008
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01566008