Skip to main content
Log in

Geodynamic effects on the static behavior and safety of dams

  • Published:
Hydrotechnical Construction Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    High and superhigh (with a height of more than 200 m) dams are geoscale structures disturbing the energy balance of large near-surface parts of the earth's crust. Their interaction with surrounding rock masses cannot be described only by the laws of geomechanics and seismic stability only by calculation for the maximum possible seismic impact. Fast and slow neotectonic movements should be taken into account when evaluating dam safety.

  2. 2.

    The static and dynamic investigations and calculations of dams carried out earlier separately should be done jointly with consideration of the discrete properties of the surrounding rock masses.

  3. 3.

    The role and scientific level of on-site observations on high dams should be substantially increases. For this purpose the matter of creating a unified scientific-methodological center of the Commonwealth of Independent States and developing supplements to the existing standards.

  4. 4.

    As a necessary routine measure, dam operators should automate the recording of readings of the neotectonically most sensitive measurement means.

  5. 5.

    When preparing the new edition of the building code for earthquake engineering, the phenomenon of induced seismicity should be taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. SNiP II-7-81. Construction in Seismic Regions [in Russian], Gosstroi SSSR, Moscow (1991).

  2. L. N. Rasskazov and A. S. Bestuzheva, “Seismic stability of earth dams,” Stroit. Mekh. Raschet Sooruzh., No. 2 (1989).

  3. N. I. Nikolaev, Neotectonics and Geodynamics of the Lithosphere [in Russian], Nedra, Moscow (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. B. Rusanov, “Tectonics and the erosion pattern of continents,” Geotektonika, No. 2 (1979).

  5. Methodological Recommendations on Investigating Deformation Earthquake Precursors, Interdepartmental Council on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering of the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences [in Russian], IFZ im. O. Yu. Shmidt, Moscow (1988).

  6. Methodological Recommendations on Observations for Detecting Hydrogeodynamic Earthquake Precursors, Interdepartmental Council on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering of the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences [in Russian], IFZ, Moscow (1986).

  7. A. N. Marchuk, “Russian research on earthquake prediction in relation to dam safety,” Water Power and Dam Construction, No. 3 (1993).

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 7, pp. 10–17, July, 1993.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchuk, A.N., Savich, A.I., Malyshev, L.I. et al. Geodynamic effects on the static behavior and safety of dams. Hydrotechnical Construction 27, 377–386 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01545688

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01545688

Keywords

Navigation