Skip to main content
Log in

Female self-report and autonomic responses to sexually pleasurable and sexually aversive readings

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate possible differential autonomic responses to sexually pleasurable and sexually aversive readings. Reading conditions were counterbalanced so that an equal number of subjects received both orders of the two readings. Female subjects' ratings, skin conductance (SC), finger pulse (FP), and heart rate (HR), in response to these readings were compared. The sexually pleasurable as compared to the sexually aversive passage was rated as more sexually stimulating, less anxiety and guilt provoking, and less disgusting, but as equally well portrayed and interesting (extent of boredom). While essentially equal SC increases were noted in response to both readings, HR deceleration and vasodilation were more characteristic of the response to the sexually pleasurable passage. These findings were compared within the context of preexperimental setting conditions and were interpreted in terms of Lacey's intake-rejection hypothesis. These findings are consistent with the idea that pleasurable sexual readings are associated with interest, attention, and heart rate deceleration, whereas aversive material may be related to rejection of the material and to heart rate acceleration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamson, J. D., Romano, K. R., Burdick, J. A., Corman, C. L., and Chebib (1972). Physiological responses to sexual and unpleasant film stimuli.J. Psychosom. Res. 16: 153–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. (1961). Scales and statistics: Parametric and nonparametric.Psychol. Bull. 58: 305–316.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Box, H. (1953). Non normality and tests on variance.Biometrika 40: 318–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. C. (1957). Response patterns.Tr. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 19: 731–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. C., and Buchwald, A. M. (1957). An exploration of somatic response patterns: Stimulus and sex differences.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 50: 44–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edelberg, R. (1972). Electrical activity of the skin: Its measurement and uses in psychophysiology. In Greenfield, N. S., and Sternback, R. A. (eds.),Handbook of Psychophysiology Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 367–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L. (1968).Experimental Design in Psychological Research Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 164–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, F. S., and Stern, J. A. (1970). Peripheral physiological variables and emotion: The James-Lange theory revisited.Psychol. Bull. 74: 411–424.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J. R. (1975). An exploration of human sexual arousal. Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., and Gebhart, P. H. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. I. (1959). Psychophysiological approaches to the evaluation of psychotherapeutic process and outcome. In Rubinstein, E., and Parloff, M. B. (eds.),Research in Psychotherapy American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. I. (1967). Somatic response patterning and stress: Some revisions of activation theory. In Appley, M. H. and Trumbull, R. C. (eds.),Psychological Stress Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., and Johnson, V. E. (1966).Human Sexual Response Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. (1965).Sexus Grove Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reifler, C. B., Howard, D. J., Lipton, M. A., Liptzin, M. B., and Widman, D. E. (1971). Pornography: An experimental study of effects.Am J. Psychiat., 575.

  • Robbins, J. (1974).A Sucker for Losers Tiburon Publishing House, Sausalito, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Higher nervous functions: The orienting reflex.Ann. Rev. Physiol. 25: 545–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, M. A., and Cullen, T. D. (1972). Studies of autonomic balance in children and adults. In Greenfield, N. S., and Sternback, R. A. (eds.),Handbook of Psychophysiology Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 535–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, M. A., Averill, J. R., and Smith, D. B. (1968). Autonomic activity during sexual arousal.Psychophysiology 4: 468–478.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1972). Physiological measures of sexual arousal in the human. InHandbook of Psychophysiology, Edem., pp. 709–742.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fehr, F.S., Schulman, M. Female self-report and autonomic responses to sexually pleasurable and sexually aversive readings. Arch Sex Behav 7, 443–453 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542489

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542489

Key words

Navigation